13.06.2013 Views

Volume 19, 2007 - Brown University

Volume 19, 2007 - Brown University

Volume 19, 2007 - Brown University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

From Monster to Mother: The Tragic<br />

Death of Clytaemnestra<br />

Laura <strong>Brown</strong>-Lavoie<br />

Throughout much of the first two plays of Aeschylus’ tragic trilogy the<br />

Oresteia, the vengeful queen Clytaemnestra is characterized as a monster. She is<br />

repeatedly portrayed like a beast of prey or demon incarnate, with little effort on<br />

the part of the playwright to justify her demeanor. It is not as if her fury is<br />

unwarranted; her husband sacrifices her child, fights for ten years in a war caused<br />

by her sister, and returns with a conquered mistress. She kills him to avenge her<br />

daughter, and is, in return, murdered by her son. Clearly it would not be hard,<br />

as an author, to temper her evil characterization with some pity, yet Aeschylus<br />

chooses not to do so until moments before her death. The effect is breathtakingly<br />

tragic. For nearly two full plays, the audience is lulled into believing the representation<br />

of Clytaemnestra as an inhuman savage. When they are reminded by<br />

her final interactions with her son that she is actually a mother—one who has<br />

suffered immensely, and lost all that was dear to her—her death becomes emotionally<br />

complicated. With this reversal of characterization, Aeschylus brings<br />

incredible tragic thrust to the climax of his trilogy, and lends credence to Robert<br />

Fagles’ assertion in the introduction of his translation: “The play is named for<br />

Agamemnon, but the tragic hero is the queen” (Fagles, <strong>19</strong>66: 46).<br />

From her initial entrance at the beginning of Agamemnon, Clytaemnestra is<br />

established as inappropriate according to gender norms. She is assertive, powerful,<br />

persuasive, and manipulative, none of which are characteristics traditionally<br />

befitting a queen. At first, many of the references to her are based on this distasteful<br />

rejection of gender roles. After her triumphant speech about Greece’s<br />

victory in Troy, the leader of the chorus concisely lays out this paradox, remarking:<br />

“Spoken like a man, my lady . . . ” (Ag. 355). But it is not until the arrival of<br />

Agamemnon and his war prize, the prophetic Cassandra, that the dehumanization<br />

of Clytaemnestra truly begins.<br />

Cassandra is the ideal voice for characterizing the queen. She is established<br />

as a vessel of truth—Apollo’s curse has made her a prophet. The events she<br />

depicts will come to pass, so the audience is unlikely to doubt whether her<br />

description of people is accurate. Through Cassandra, Aeschylus is brutal. In the<br />

throes of prophecy, she bemoans Agamemnon’s fate, saying that he is “lost to<br />

that detestable hellhound who pricks her ears and fawns and her tongue draws<br />

out her glittering words of welcome” (Ag. 1237-39). She continues a few lines<br />

later:<br />

9

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!