Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
From Monster to Mother: The Tragic<br />
Death of Clytaemnestra<br />
Laura <strong>Brown</strong>-Lavoie<br />
Throughout much of the first two plays of Aeschylus’ tragic trilogy the<br />
Oresteia, the vengeful queen Clytaemnestra is characterized as a monster. She is<br />
repeatedly portrayed like a beast of prey or demon incarnate, with little effort on<br />
the part of the playwright to justify her demeanor. It is not as if her fury is<br />
unwarranted; her husband sacrifices her child, fights for ten years in a war caused<br />
by her sister, and returns with a conquered mistress. She kills him to avenge her<br />
daughter, and is, in return, murdered by her son. Clearly it would not be hard,<br />
as an author, to temper her evil characterization with some pity, yet Aeschylus<br />
chooses not to do so until moments before her death. The effect is breathtakingly<br />
tragic. For nearly two full plays, the audience is lulled into believing the representation<br />
of Clytaemnestra as an inhuman savage. When they are reminded by<br />
her final interactions with her son that she is actually a mother—one who has<br />
suffered immensely, and lost all that was dear to her—her death becomes emotionally<br />
complicated. With this reversal of characterization, Aeschylus brings<br />
incredible tragic thrust to the climax of his trilogy, and lends credence to Robert<br />
Fagles’ assertion in the introduction of his translation: “The play is named for<br />
Agamemnon, but the tragic hero is the queen” (Fagles, <strong>19</strong>66: 46).<br />
From her initial entrance at the beginning of Agamemnon, Clytaemnestra is<br />
established as inappropriate according to gender norms. She is assertive, powerful,<br />
persuasive, and manipulative, none of which are characteristics traditionally<br />
befitting a queen. At first, many of the references to her are based on this distasteful<br />
rejection of gender roles. After her triumphant speech about Greece’s<br />
victory in Troy, the leader of the chorus concisely lays out this paradox, remarking:<br />
“Spoken like a man, my lady . . . ” (Ag. 355). But it is not until the arrival of<br />
Agamemnon and his war prize, the prophetic Cassandra, that the dehumanization<br />
of Clytaemnestra truly begins.<br />
Cassandra is the ideal voice for characterizing the queen. She is established<br />
as a vessel of truth—Apollo’s curse has made her a prophet. The events she<br />
depicts will come to pass, so the audience is unlikely to doubt whether her<br />
description of people is accurate. Through Cassandra, Aeschylus is brutal. In the<br />
throes of prophecy, she bemoans Agamemnon’s fate, saying that he is “lost to<br />
that detestable hellhound who pricks her ears and fawns and her tongue draws<br />
out her glittering words of welcome” (Ag. 1237-39). She continues a few lines<br />
later:<br />
9