13.06.2013 Views

Volume 19, 2007 - Brown University

Volume 19, 2007 - Brown University

Volume 19, 2007 - Brown University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The Inner World of the Pastoral 127<br />

and kids. These alterations, however, are only adaptations that change the surface<br />

of the poetry, not the substance. Again, Virgil uses the pastoral to investigate<br />

the nature of poetry and the genre, and Sannazaro uses the pastoral to<br />

investtigate that same, now ancient, poetry. As in the classical tradition, the first<br />

Piscatoria is programmatic, and an investigation of its themes and forms will<br />

reveal much about the whole cycle of poetry.<br />

Sannazaro’s first Ecloga is a dirge, a poem in which Lycidas—here a fisherman<br />

rather than a shepherd—mourns the loss of his beloved Phyllis, closely<br />

paralleling Virgil’s fifth Bucolica, in which Mopsus laments the death of Daphnis.<br />

Such lamentations were a central topos of the pastoral, so Sannazaro’s<br />

choice of mourning as a theme is firmly set in the pastoral tradition. Like<br />

Virgil’s Eclogue V, Sannazaro’s involves a dialogue between two poets; again,<br />

this is squarely within the Virgilian pastoral tradition—a dialogue provides a<br />

dialectic method to reach a consensus on the defining characteristics of pastoral<br />

verse, a question that particularly interested Sannazaro. Even though the first<br />

Piscatoria is closest in theme to Virgil’s fifth Ecloga, the first allusion to<br />

Virgilian poetry in the Piscatorial Eclogues is to Eclogue I (Mustard, <strong>19</strong>14).<br />

Mirabar, vicina, Mycon, per litora nuper / Dum vagor (Sannazaro 1.1-2)<br />

Mirabar quid maesta deos Amarylli vocares (Virgil 1.1.36)<br />

Sannazaro begins his poem with an address by Lycidas to a fellow fisherman: “I<br />

was wondering, Mycon. . .why the raven should be calling after me more than<br />

his wont, and why the dripping wildfowl. . .were filling the gloomy rocks with<br />

their mournful cries.” Lycidas is surveying his piscatorial world, noticing that all<br />

of nature is mourning the death of Phyllis. Similarly, in Virgil, Mopsus observes<br />

nature mourning the loss of the shepherd Tityrus. Phyllis has died, but Tityrus<br />

has been exiled; in both cases, the state of the pastoral landscape reflects the<br />

voice of the narrator. Sannazaro’s allusion invokes the tremendous sense of the<br />

loss of Tityrus and highlights the opposition between the pastoral and the nonpastoral<br />

world, setting up themes of opposition and nostalgia that are present in<br />

works by both Virgil and Sannazaro.<br />

In the same opening, Sannazaro also uses Virgil to legitimize his new<br />

marine setting. The litora of the first line is rarely mentioned in Virgil’s poetry,<br />

but his second eclogue provides one such instance: “nuper me in litore vidi, cum<br />

placidum ventis staret mare” (Virgil 2.25-26). In this passage, the shepherd<br />

Corydon describes his abundance and the perfection of his current idyllic<br />

setting, which includes the vision of a calm sea as he stands on the shore. Thus,<br />

even in Virgil’s world, the seashore could be complementary to the pastoral<br />

world. Sannazaro later expands on Corydon’s vision in the Piscatoriae.<br />

The remainder of Lycidas’ introduction (lines 1-11) serves two purposes:<br />

to introduce the reader to the new setting of the pastoral and to move from<br />

nature’s sorrow to Lycidas’ particular sorrow. Regarding the first goal,<br />

Sannazaro describes the seashore in detail: ravens and waterfowl provide the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!