Mechanisms of Olfaction in Insects - ResearchSpace@Auckland ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Identification of putative odorant receptors from Epiphyas postvittana 94 4.2.13 qRT-PCR primer test Each set of primers were used with the cDNA samples from the three different tissues in a gradient cycler to optimise the PCR conditions and obtain the optimal annealing temperature for each. The standard PCR reaction components were as follows: 1x PCR buffer including 1.5 mM magnesium, 0.2 mM of each dNTP, 2 units of Taq DNA polymerase, 0.5 µM of each primer, 30 ng cDNA template and water added to a reaction volume of 20 µL. The PCR cycling conditions were as follows: 95 o C for 2 minutes, followed by 40 cycles at 94 o C for 15 seconds, gradient from 50 to 60 o C for 20 seconds, 72 o C for 30 seconds and a final elongation at 72 o C for 10 minutes. The gradient tested was from 50 o C in column 1 through to 60 o C in column 12. PCR products were visualised on 1% agarose gel with 1x SYBR safe DNA gel stain (Invitrogen) and visualised on the ImageQuant 300 system (GE Healthcare Life Sciences). 4.2.14 Quantitative Real-Time PCR Quantitative real-time PCR were performed in 384 well plates on either Applied Biosystems 7900HT Fast Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems) or on the Roche LightCycler 480 instrument (Roche, Germany), with SYBR green as the fluorescent reporter. Each primer template combination was set up in triplicate and a no template water control was included for each primer pair, (two pools of each template giving a total of six different templates). The housekeeping genes Ef1α and α-tubulin (Turner et al., 2006) were used due to their consistent expression in different E. postvittana tissues. For qRT-PCR performed on Applied Biosystems 7900HT Fast Real-Time PCR System, the plate and instrument set up were designed using the SDS 2.1 software (Applied Biosystems). The assay type performed was absolute quantification followed by a dissociation curve analysis at the end of the run to check for single PCR products. The reaction conditions were same as that for primer tests except for the addition of 0.2 µL of 1/1000 SYBR green dye (Molecular Probes). The PCR cycling conditions were 95 o C for 2 minutes, followed by 40 cycles at 94 o C for 15 seconds, 55 o C for 20 seconds, 72 o C for 30 seconds followed by the generation of a dissociation
Identification of putative odorant receptors from Epiphyas postvittana 95 curve with the following thermal profile; 95°C for 15 seconds, 60°C for 15 seconds, 95°C for 15 seconds, with a ramp rate of 2%. The result files obtained from the run were loaded into the SDS 2.1 software and the amplification and dissociation curves were checked for consistency between the triplicates. Wells that had more than one peak in the dissociation curve, hence more than one PCR product were omitted from further analysis. Primer PCR efficiencies were calculated using the LinRegPCR (Ramakers et al., 2003) program and the Cycle Threshold (Ct) values for all the samples were converted to quantity of product formed in each sample by the following equation: Quantity = (PCR efficiency) (minimum quantity for a particular treatment – current Ct value) The mean quantities of the housekeeping genes for each tissue type were used with the software geNorm (Vandesompele et al., 2002) for calculating the normalisation factor for the individual tissue types. These normalisation factors were then used for calculating the relative expression of the samples. For qRT-PCR performed on a Roche LightCycler 480 instrument, the reaction mixture consisted of 5 µL 2x FastStart SYBR Green Master (Roche, Germany), 0.5 µM of each primer and 30 ng of cDNA template, in a total reaction volume of 10 µL made up with nuclease-free water. The thermal profile of the run was as follows: 95 o C for 5 minutes at ramp rate ( o C/s) of 4.8, then 40 cycles at 95 o C for 15 seconds at ramp rate of 4.8, 55 o C for 30 seconds at ramp rate of 2.5 and 72 o C for 20 seconds at ramp rate of 4.8. A melt curve was then generated at the end of the amplification to verify single products with the following profile: 95 o C for 5 seconds at a ramp rate of 4.8, 65 o C for 1 minute at ramp rate of 2.5 followed by continuous acquisition at 97 o C at a ramp rate of 0.11. Analysis of the raw data was carried out with the LightCycler 480 software version 1.5 (Roche). PCR efficiencies of the primers were calculated using the exported amplification data at every cycle using the program LinRegPCR (Ramakers et al., 2003). The relative quantification of the test genes was calculated based on relative expression of target versus housekeeping genes, as stated in Pfaffl (2001).
Page 1 and 2:
http://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz
Page 3 and 4:
Abstract Abstract Olfaction or the
Page 5 and 6:
Acknowledgements Acknowledgements I
Page 7 and 8:
Contents v Contents Abstract……
Page 9 and 10:
Contents 4.2.5 Degenerate PCR .....
Page 11 and 12:
List of Figures List of Figures Fig
Page 13 and 14:
List of Tables List of Tables Table
Page 15 and 16:
List of Abbreviations gDNA Genomic
Page 17 and 18:
1.1 General overview 1 General Intr
Page 19 and 20:
General Introduction 3 moth in loca
Page 21 and 22:
General Introduction 5 Figure 1.1:
Page 23 and 24:
General Introduction 7 1.5 Componen
Page 25 and 26:
General Introduction 9 OBPs have al
Page 27 and 28:
General Introduction 11 A model has
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
General Introduction 15 Tanaka et a
Page 33 and 34:
General Introduction 17 Table 1.1:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
General Introduction 21 et al., 200
Page 39 and 40:
General Introduction 23 the attract
Page 41 and 42:
General Introduction 25 leaves and
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
General Introduction 29 Expression
Page 47 and 48:
General Introduction 31 BmOr2 HvOr2
Page 49 and 50:
General Introduction 33 for lepidop
Page 51 and 52:
Functional characterisation of Epip
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60: Functional characterisation of Epip
Page 73 and 74: 3.1 Introduction 3 The roles of Epi
Page 75 and 76: The roles of Epiphyas postvittana G
Page 95 and 96: 4.1 Introduction 4 Identification o
Page 97 and 98: Identification of putative odorant
Page 109: Microarray OR 454 Transcriptome OR
Page 141 and 142: 5.1 Introduction 5 Concluding Discu
Page 143 and 144: Concluding Discussion 127 VOBA sett
Page 145 and 146: Concluding Discussion 129 redundant
Page 147 and 148: Concluding Discussion 131 against t
Page 149 and 150: Concluding Discussion 133 sequencin
Page 151 and 152: Appendix B 135 Buffered TB (Sambroo
Page 153 and 154: Appendix C 137 C. Appendix C - Clus
Page 155 and 156: Appendix D 139 D. Appendix D - Solu
Page 157 and 158: Appendix E 141 I II
Page 159 and 160: Appendix E 143 V
Page 161 and 162:
Appendix E 145 VII continued Figure
Page 163 and 164:
References 147 Ansebo, L., Ignell,
Page 165 and 166:
References 149 Butenandt, A., Beckm
Page 167 and 168:
References 151 Fedurco, M., Romieu,
Page 169 and 170:
References 153 Große-Wilde, E., St
Page 171 and 172:
References 155 Hrdy, I., F. Kuldova
Page 173 and 174:
References 157 Kaissling, K. E. (19
Page 175 and 176:
References 159 Krieger, J., Große-
Page 177 and 178:
References 161 Lopez-Gomez, R. and
Page 179 and 180:
References 163 Miura, N., Nakagawa,
Page 181 and 182:
References 165 Pell, J. K., Macaula
Page 183 and 184:
References 167 Røstelien, T., Stra
Page 185 and 186:
References 169 Stowers, L. and Loga
Page 187 and 188:
References 171 Turner, C. T., Davy,
Page 189 and 190:
References 173 Vogt, R. G., Riddifo
Page 191 and 192:
References 175 Widmayer, P., Heifet
show all

Mechanisms of Olfaction in Insects - ResearchSpace@Auckland ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?