18.06.2013 Views

Mechanisms of Olfaction in Insects - ResearchSpace@Auckland ...

Mechanisms of Olfaction in Insects - ResearchSpace@Auckland ...

Mechanisms of Olfaction in Insects - ResearchSpace@Auckland ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The roles <strong>of</strong> Epiphyas postvittana GOBP2 <strong>in</strong> odour detection 60<br />

antennae hence postulated to have a female oriented role, perhaps <strong>in</strong> the b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong><br />

some as yet unknown male specific pheromone. The fourth PBP, called PBP3 showed<br />

higher expression <strong>in</strong> male than female antennae, and has been postulated to be<br />

<strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> the pheromone component(s) <strong>of</strong> E. postvittana.<br />

The two GOBPs are members <strong>of</strong> the GOBP1 and GOBP2 family <strong>of</strong> GOBPs <strong>in</strong> moths<br />

and GOBP2 has a similar level <strong>of</strong> expression <strong>in</strong> male and female antennae (Newcomb<br />

et al., 2002). No data on sensillum localisation <strong>of</strong> EpGOBPs is available yet, however,<br />

the expression <strong>of</strong> A. polyphemus, B. mori and H. armigera GOBPs have been shown<br />

to be restricted to sensilla basiconica, hence a role <strong>of</strong> GOBPs <strong>in</strong> b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g plant volatiles<br />

<strong>of</strong> importance to moths is assumed (Ste<strong>in</strong>brecht et al., 1995; Wang et al., 2003). Very<br />

limited functional data is as yet available for any moth GOBP, with the only study<br />

reveal<strong>in</strong>g that M. sexta GOBP2 b<strong>in</strong>ds the plant volatiles (Z)-3-hexen-1-ol, geraniol,<br />

geranyl acetate and limonene (Feng and Prestwich, 1997) and a recent study revealed<br />

B. mori GOBP2 b<strong>in</strong>ds bombykol and is able to discrim<strong>in</strong>ate it from the antagonist,<br />

bombykal (Zhou et al., 2009). Both M. sexta and B. mori GOBP1 have so far failed to<br />

b<strong>in</strong>d any <strong>of</strong> the ligands they have been tested with (Vogt et al., 2002; Zhou et al.,<br />

2009) lead<strong>in</strong>g to the conclusion that the prote<strong>in</strong>s tested might be <strong>in</strong>active allelic<br />

variants.<br />

3.1.1 Aim<br />

The aim <strong>of</strong> this research chapter is to test hypotheses <strong>of</strong> possible roles for GOBPs.<br />

GOBPs could be non-specific solubilis<strong>in</strong>g agents for a range <strong>of</strong> plant volatiles, or they<br />

could be ligand specific, like that observed for moth PBPs. GOBPs could form a<br />

complex with the ligand, and <strong>in</strong>teraction <strong>of</strong> this complex confers <strong>in</strong>creased sensitivity<br />

and selectivity onto the OR, as shown for H. virescens and B. mori PBPs <strong>in</strong><br />

heterologous cell assay systems. With this knowledge <strong>of</strong> roles <strong>of</strong> PBPs <strong>in</strong><br />

heterologous systems, a similar approach <strong>of</strong> us<strong>in</strong>g a reconstituted heterologous assay<br />

system can be used to test the hypothesised roles <strong>of</strong> GOBPs with E. postvittana<br />

GOBP2 (EpGOBP2) as a model: can EpGOBP2 act as a solubilis<strong>in</strong>g agent for plant<br />

volatiles? GOBP2 homologues <strong>in</strong> M. sexta and B. mori have been shown to b<strong>in</strong>d plant<br />

volatiles and sex pheromone components hence we assume EpGOBP2 to have a<br />

similar ligand b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g range. As part <strong>of</strong> this PhD research, E. postvittana OR1 was

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!