Mechanisms of Olfaction in Insects - ResearchSpace@Auckland ...
Mechanisms of Olfaction in Insects - ResearchSpace@Auckland ...
Mechanisms of Olfaction in Insects - ResearchSpace@Auckland ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Functional characterisation <strong>of</strong> Epiphyas postvittana odorant receptor 1 35<br />
species us<strong>in</strong>g degenerate PCR, transcriptome sequenc<strong>in</strong>g and whole genome<br />
sequenc<strong>in</strong>g techniques; E. postvittana (Jordan et al., 2009), A. polyphemus (Forstner<br />
et al., 2009), B. mori (Sakurai et al., 2004; Krieger et al., 2005; Nakagawa et al.,<br />
2005; Wanner et al., 2007; Tanaka et al., 2009), P. xylostella, M. separata, D. <strong>in</strong>dica<br />
(Mitsuno et al., 2008), H. virescens (Krieger et al., 2002; Krieger et al., 2004),<br />
Spodoptera exigua (Xiu et al., 2004) A. pernyi (Krieger et al., 2003), M. sexta (Patch<br />
et al., 2009; Große-Wilde et al., 2010) and eight different Ostr<strong>in</strong>ia species (Miura et<br />
al., 2009; Wanner et al., 2010). The majority <strong>of</strong> ORs from moths have been identified<br />
<strong>in</strong> B. mori and H. virescens.<br />
Typically <strong>in</strong> studies, the usual approach to characterise novel OR genes are to group<br />
them <strong>in</strong>to clades based on their phylogenetic relationships. The expression levels <strong>of</strong><br />
the ORs can be then tested <strong>in</strong> different tissues <strong>in</strong> male and female moths, those that<br />
show sex biased expression patterns are classified as putative pheromone receptors.<br />
De-orphan<strong>in</strong>g the receptors us<strong>in</strong>g available assay systems is carried out to confirm<br />
they are pheromone receptors and identify which components <strong>of</strong> sex pheromone<br />
blends they b<strong>in</strong>d. Pheromone receptors have so far been identified and functionally<br />
characterised for a number <strong>of</strong> moth species <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g B. mori, H. virescens, P.<br />
xylostella, M. separata, D. <strong>in</strong>dica, A. polyphemus, O. scapulalis, O. latipennis, and O.<br />
nubulalis, see section 1.5.2.1 (Nakagawa et al., 2005; Mitsuno et al., 2008; Forstner et<br />
al., 2009; Miura et al., 2009; Wang et al., 2010).<br />
Attempts to decode the olfactory systems <strong>of</strong> moths have seen the use <strong>of</strong> EAG to show<br />
the recognition <strong>of</strong> a vast range <strong>of</strong> important plant semiochemicals <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g esters,<br />
terpenes, alcohols, aliphatics and aldehydes by different species <strong>of</strong> moths. These may<br />
aid the <strong>in</strong>sects <strong>in</strong> locat<strong>in</strong>g oviposition sites and food sources (Suckl<strong>in</strong>g et al., 1996;<br />
Suckl<strong>in</strong>g et al., 1996; Fraser et al., 2003; Das et al., 2007). This method gives a broad<br />
picture <strong>of</strong> the wide range <strong>of</strong> volatiles recognised by the moth, however, <strong>in</strong>formation<br />
on the receptive range <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividual ORs, which is at the forefront <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>vestigat<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>in</strong>to the molecular mechanisms <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>sect olfaction is lack<strong>in</strong>g. Several characterisation<br />
assay systems have been successfully developed and used to confer functionality to<br />
<strong>in</strong>dividual ORs over the years. These <strong>in</strong>clude either the <strong>in</strong> vivo empty-neuron system<br />
developed <strong>in</strong> Drosophila (Stortkuhl and Kettler, 2001; Dobritsa et al., 2003) or <strong>in</strong><br />
vitro assays <strong>in</strong> heterologous cell-based expression systems (Wetzel et al., 2001;