- Page 1 and 2:
Gamma Rays and Carbon Ion-Beams Irr
- Page 3 and 4:
Table of contents Chapter 1 1.1. In
- Page 5 and 6:
4.2.1.1. Cultivars of banana……
- Page 7 and 8:
and ‘Valery’, which are exporte
- Page 9 and 10:
‘Cavendish Enano’, ‘Williams
- Page 11 and 12:
Although it is now found only in Au
- Page 13 and 14:
varieties bred at the Jamaican prog
- Page 15 and 16:
such as ‘Paka’ (AA) and ‘Pisa
- Page 17 and 18:
Resistance (PR). In connection with
- Page 19 and 20:
large number of improved mutant cro
- Page 21 and 22:
which migrated faster (Rf = 0.44) t
- Page 23 and 24:
is juglone (5 hydroxy-1,4-napthoqui
- Page 25 and 26:
experiments involving various biolo
- Page 27 and 28:
Tanaka (1999) reported novel genes
- Page 29 and 30:
2. 1. Materials and Methods Chapter
- Page 31 and 32:
2. 1. 1. 4. FHIA-01 ‘FHIA-01’(M
- Page 33 and 34:
(Gamma room)” and “Carbon ion-b
- Page 35 and 36:
esulting from “Gamma Room” expe
- Page 37 and 38:
traits as female sterility and part
- Page 39 and 40:
3. 2. 1. 3. Chronic irradiation ( 1
- Page 41 and 42:
Gy. ‘Williams’ and ‘Orito’
- Page 43 and 44:
a diploid clone (genomic constituti
- Page 45 and 46:
‘Williams’ (93%), the necrotic
- Page 47 and 48:
etween the irradiation doses and th
- Page 49 and 50:
moment they are at the development
- Page 51 and 52:
A B C D Fig. 2. Cultivars of banana
- Page 53 and 54:
Weight of plantlets (g) Height of p
- Page 55 and 56:
Control 50 Gy 100 Gy 150 Gy Fig. 6.
- Page 57 and 58:
Control 50 Gy 100 Gy 150 Gy 200 Gy
- Page 59 and 60: Survival rate (%) for LD50 Survival
- Page 61 and 62: A B C D E F Fig. 12. A plant from
- Page 63 and 64: B D AA E Fig 14. Banana meristems a
- Page 65 and 66: A B C Orito Orito Orito Cavendish E
- Page 67 and 68: No. plants No. plants No. plants No
- Page 69 and 70: Circunference (cm) Plant height (cm
- Page 71 and 72: Table 1. Differences of the plantle
- Page 73 and 74: Table 3. Differences of the surviva
- Page 75 and 76: Table 5. Selected materials reporti
- Page 77 and 78: Table 8. Factor of effectiveness an
- Page 79 and 80: deletion rather than point mutation
- Page 81 and 82: were recorded. From the results, th
- Page 83 and 84: 4. 2. 2. Assessment of banana plant
- Page 85 and 86: placement among the plants (Fig. 30
- Page 87 and 88: hours, photographs of the leaf-disc
- Page 89 and 90: ‘Williams’ (B) was obtained by
- Page 91 and 92: class limits values are clearly sep
- Page 93 and 94: values in ‘Cavendish Enano’ ran
- Page 95 and 96: Only a partial resistance was obser
- Page 97 and 98: Sigatoka but also fruit quality, po
- Page 99 and 100: A C Fig. 23. Banana plantlets packa
- Page 101 and 102: A C Fig. 25. Acclimatization of the
- Page 103 and 104: A C Fig. 27. Survival plantlets for
- Page 105 and 106: A C Fig. 29. Mycosphaerella fijiens
- Page 107 and 108: A C Fig. 31. Labor during transplan
- Page 109: B A Fig. 33. Establishment of the j
- Page 113 and 114: Survival rate (%) for LD50 Survival
- Page 115 and 116: 0 0.5 1 2 4 Fig 39. Banana plantlet
- Page 117 and 118: A B C Fig. 41. Regenerated explants
- Page 119 and 120: Range of optimum doses (Gy) 16 15 1
- Page 121 and 122: Percent of plants Percent of plants
- Page 123 and 124: LDNA-% LDNA-% DDP-days 100 80 60 40
- Page 125 and 126: Fig. 49. Hexaploid cells in ‘Cave
- Page 127 and 128: Table 10. Infection index (II-%), d
- Page 129 and 130: Table 12. DDP-days, II-% and LDNA-%
- Page 131 and 132: Chapter 5 General Discussion Gamma
- Page 133 and 134: FHIA-01 were not able to compare du
- Page 135 and 136: ‘W 1 II 31’. In the case of ‘
- Page 137 and 138: Summary Both Gamma rays and Carbon
- Page 139 and 140: A ‘Cavendish Enano’ plant with
- Page 141 and 142: I extend my gratitude also to Dr. K
- Page 143 and 144: Cohan, J, P., C. Abadie, K. Tomekp
- Page 145 and 146: Hase, Y., M. Yamaguchi and A. Tanak
- Page 147 and 148: Molina, G. C. and J. P. Krausz (198
- Page 149 and 150: Roux, N. S. (2001). Mutation induct