Gamma Rays and CarbonIon-Beams Irradiation for Mutation ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Orjeda G. (1998). Evaluación de la resistencia de los bananos a las enfermedades de Sigatoka y marchitamiento por Fusarium. Guías técnicas INIBAP 3. Instituto internacional de los recursos filogenéticos, Roma, Italia, Red internacional para el mejoramiento del banano y el plátano, Montpellier, Francia. 63 pp. Ostry, M., R. McRoberts, K. Ward, and R. Resendez (1988). Screening hybrid Polars in vitro for resistance to leaf spot caused by Septoria musiva. Plant Disease 72: 497-499. Ottolenghi A., F. Ballarini, M. Merzagora (1999). Modelling radiationinduced biological lesions: from initial energy depositions to chromosome aberrations. Radiat. Environ. Biophys., 38: 1–13. Proyect CORPEI-CBI (2003). Organic Baby Banana Products’ Profile, “Exportable Supply Expansion of Ecuador”. http://www.sica.gov.ec/agronegocios/productos%20para%20invertir/ CORPEI/orito_org%C3%A1nico.pdf Ramirez T. L., de la C. González, M. Ventura, S. Rodríguez and J. R. Gálvez (2005). Production of banana and plantain hybrids in Cuba. Infomusa 14:11-13 Reyes-Borja, W. O., K. Degi, S. Nagatomi, Y. Sekozawa, S. Sugaya, and H. Gemma (2005). Identification od banana mutant resistant to juglone, a toxin produced in black Sigatoka disease, using gamma rays coupled with in vitro techniques. Jpn. J. Trop. Agr. 49: 38-44. Reyes-Borja. W. O. (1995). Comportamiento agronómico y grado de resistencia y/o susceptibilidad al ataque de Sigatoka negra (Mycosphaerella fijiensis Morelet) en cultivares introducidos de banano y plátano. Babahoyo, Ecuador. Tesis de grado, Ingeniero Agrónomo, Universidad Técnica de Babahoyo, Facultad de Ciencias Agrícolas, Escuela de Ingeniería Agronómica. 129 p. Rivenshield, A. (2003). Allelopathy, Cornell university. Department of Soil Science. http://csip.cornell.edu/Projects/CEIRP/AR/Allelopathy.pdf. Romero, R., and T. Sutton (1997). Reaction of four Musa genotypes at three temperatures to isolates of Mycosphaerella fijiensis from different geographical regions. Plant Dis. 81:1139- 1142. 143
Roux, N. S. (2001). Mutation induction in Musa, Review. In Proceedings: Banana improvement: cellular, molecular biology, and induced mutations, September 24-28, 2001, Leuven, Belgium / S. Mohan Jain, Rony Swennen editors. 647 pp. Rowe, P. (1984). Breeding banana and plantain. In: Plant Breeding Review. (Janick, J. ed.), Westport, p.135-155. Sackston, W. and B. Vimard (1988) Leaf disk immersion (LDI) inoculation of sunflower with Plasmopara halstedii for in vitro determination of host-pathogen relationships. Plant Disease, 72: 227-229. Sarah, J. L., J. Pinochet and J. Stanton (1996). The borrowing nematode of Bananas, Radopholus similis COBB, 1913. INIBAP, Musa Pest Fact Sheet No. 1. Severn-Ellis, A. A., M. Daneel, K. de Jager and D. De Waele (2003). Develop of an aeroponic system to study the response of banana roots to infection with fusarium oxysporum f. sp. Cubense and Radopholus similes. Infomusa 12:22-24. Shikazono, N. Y. Yokota, S. Kitamura, C. Suzuki, H. Watanabe, S. Tano and A. Tanaka (2003). Mutation rate and novel tt mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana induced by carbon ions. Genetics, 163:1449- 1455. Speijer, P. R. and D. De Waele (1997). Screening of Musa Germplasm for Resistance and Tolerance to Nematodes. INIBAP, Technical Guidelines. International Network for the Improvement of Banana and Plantain, Montpellier, France. Stierle, A. A., R. Upadhyay, J. Hershenhorn, G. A.Strobel, and G. Molina (1991). The phytotoxins of Mycosphaerella fijiensis, the causative agent of black Sigatoka disease of banana and plantains. Phytotoxins and their involvement in plant diseases. Birkhauser Verlag. Experientia 47:853-859. Stover, R. H. and N. W. Simmons (1987). Bananas. Wiley and Sons, New York, p. 397-438. Stover, R. H. (1986) Banana and plantain breeding strategies, Eds G. J. Persley and E.A. Delanghe. ACIAR, Canberra, Australia, p. 114-118. 144
Page 1 and 2:
Gamma Rays and Carbon Ion-Beams Irr
Page 3 and 4:
Table of contents Chapter 1 1.1. In
Page 5 and 6:
4.2.1.1. Cultivars of banana……
Page 7 and 8:
and ‘Valery’, which are exporte
Page 9 and 10:
‘Cavendish Enano’, ‘Williams
Page 11 and 12:
Although it is now found only in Au
Page 13 and 14:
varieties bred at the Jamaican prog
Page 15 and 16:
such as ‘Paka’ (AA) and ‘Pisa
Page 17 and 18:
Resistance (PR). In connection with
Page 19 and 20:
large number of improved mutant cro
Page 21 and 22:
which migrated faster (Rf = 0.44) t
Page 23 and 24:
is juglone (5 hydroxy-1,4-napthoqui
Page 25 and 26:
experiments involving various biolo
Page 27 and 28:
Tanaka (1999) reported novel genes
Page 29 and 30:
2. 1. Materials and Methods Chapter
Page 31 and 32:
2. 1. 1. 4. FHIA-01 ‘FHIA-01’(M
Page 33 and 34:
(Gamma room)” and “Carbon ion-b
Page 35 and 36:
esulting from “Gamma Room” expe
Page 37 and 38:
traits as female sterility and part
Page 39 and 40:
3. 2. 1. 3. Chronic irradiation ( 1
Page 41 and 42:
Gy. ‘Williams’ and ‘Orito’
Page 43 and 44:
a diploid clone (genomic constituti
Page 45 and 46:
‘Williams’ (93%), the necrotic
Page 47 and 48:
etween the irradiation doses and th
Page 49 and 50:
moment they are at the development
Page 51 and 52:
A B C D Fig. 2. Cultivars of banana
Page 53 and 54:
Weight of plantlets (g) Height of p
Page 55 and 56:
Control 50 Gy 100 Gy 150 Gy Fig. 6.
Page 57 and 58:
Control 50 Gy 100 Gy 150 Gy 200 Gy
Page 59 and 60:
Survival rate (%) for LD50 Survival
Page 61 and 62:
A B C D E F Fig. 12. A plant from
Page 63 and 64:
B D AA E Fig 14. Banana meristems a
Page 65 and 66:
A B C Orito Orito Orito Cavendish E
Page 67 and 68:
No. plants No. plants No. plants No
Page 69 and 70:
Circunference (cm) Plant height (cm
Page 71 and 72:
Table 1. Differences of the plantle
Page 73 and 74:
Table 3. Differences of the surviva
Page 75 and 76:
Table 5. Selected materials reporti
Page 77 and 78:
Table 8. Factor of effectiveness an
Page 79 and 80:
deletion rather than point mutation
Page 81 and 82:
were recorded. From the results, th
Page 83 and 84:
4. 2. 2. Assessment of banana plant
Page 85 and 86:
placement among the plants (Fig. 30
Page 87 and 88:
hours, photographs of the leaf-disc
Page 89 and 90:
‘Williams’ (B) was obtained by
Page 91 and 92:
class limits values are clearly sep
Page 93 and 94:
values in ‘Cavendish Enano’ ran
Page 95 and 96:
Only a partial resistance was obser
Page 97 and 98: Sigatoka but also fruit quality, po
Page 99 and 100: A C Fig. 23. Banana plantlets packa
Page 101 and 102: A C Fig. 25. Acclimatization of the
Page 103 and 104: A C Fig. 27. Survival plantlets for
Page 105 and 106: A C Fig. 29. Mycosphaerella fijiens
Page 107 and 108: A C Fig. 31. Labor during transplan
Page 109 and 110: B A Fig. 33. Establishment of the j
Page 111 and 112: A B Fig. 35. Regenerated plantlets
Page 113 and 114: Survival rate (%) for LD50 Survival
Page 115 and 116: 0 0.5 1 2 4 Fig 39. Banana plantlet
Page 117 and 118: A B C Fig. 41. Regenerated explants
Page 119 and 120: Range of optimum doses (Gy) 16 15 1
Page 121 and 122: Percent of plants Percent of plants
Page 123 and 124: LDNA-% LDNA-% DDP-days 100 80 60 40
Page 125 and 126: Fig. 49. Hexaploid cells in ‘Cave
Page 127 and 128: Table 10. Infection index (II-%), d
Page 129 and 130: Table 12. DDP-days, II-% and LDNA-%
Page 131 and 132: Chapter 5 General Discussion Gamma
Page 133 and 134: FHIA-01 were not able to compare du
Page 135 and 136: ‘W 1 II 31’. In the case of ‘
Page 137 and 138: Summary Both Gamma rays and Carbon
Page 139 and 140: A ‘Cavendish Enano’ plant with
Page 141 and 142: I extend my gratitude also to Dr. K
Page 143 and 144: Cohan, J, P., C. Abadie, K. Tomekp
Page 145 and 146: Hase, Y., M. Yamaguchi and A. Tanak
Page 147: Molina, G. C. and J. P. Krausz (198
show all

Gamma Rays and CarbonIon-Beams Irradiation for Mutation ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?