Gamma Rays and CarbonIon-Beams Irradiation for Mutation ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

A B Fig. 50. A ‘Cavendish Enano’ plant from carbon ion-beams irradiation (4 Gy) showing a fast growth (center) compared with the all plants in the group. 121
Table 10. Infection index (II-%), disease development period (DDP-days) Cultivar/code No. Black Sigatoka-infection index (%)/evaluation DDP/inoculated leaf No. per inoculated leaf <strong>and</strong> leaf-discs necrotic area (LDNA-%) in ion-beams irradiated ‘Cavendish Enano’ plantlets. 122 Leaf- Cavendish Enano 16-Jun-06 27-Jun-06 10-Jul-06 24-Jul-06 1 2 3 CE 0 I 28 18.5 33.3 37.5 64.3 57.6 52.6 38.0 58.09 CE 0.5 I 9 27.8 20.8 33.3 54.2 61.4 55.4 39 59.32 CE 0.5 I 1 20.4 31.5 41.7 87.5 53.2 51 35.2 88.84 CE 0.5 II 14 8.3 21.4 52.4 73.3 47.8 - - 73.22 CE 0.5 II 59 24.1 33.3 27.8 56.7 67 55 41.2 52.72 CE 0.5 I 24 24.1 35.0 33.3 68.8 63 60.2 49.2 55.15 CE 1 I 26 31.5 25.0 43.8 59.5 61.4 51 41.2 43.18 CE 1 II 61 18.5 31.8 37.0 29.2 53.2 46.8 48 49.02 CE 1 II 98 20.4 25.0 47.9 47.2 51.2 48.2 46.4 33.07 CE 1 II 28 24.1 25.0 41.7 83.3 59 48.2 52.0 84.93 CE 1 I 14 27.8 18.3 53.7 72.2 54 51 - 43.75 CE 4 I 66 25.9 31.3 41.7 61.1 49 44 31.0 58.54 CE 4 II 30 20.8 25.9 33.3 43.8 60.6 54.2 46.0 40.69 CE 4 II 88 27.1 20.8 52.1 43.3 51.2 46.8 42.0 40 CE 4 II 126 19.0 38.9 38.9 66.7 60 49.6 38.0 78.4 CE 8 II 11 20.8 33.3 52.4 58.3 56.2 49.6 38.0 86.23 CE 16 II 17 11.1 20.8 42.6 52.8 54.8 51 38 88.57 CE 16 II 28 14.8 37.5 58.3 76.7 50.4 49.6 35.2 88.62 CE 16 II 10 24.1 35.0 55.6 58.3 51.2 40 27.0 51.33 CE 16 II 25 25.0 22.2 29.2 25.0 60.6 51 - 64.29 CE 32 I 69 31.5 31.3 47.6 40.5 50 44 44.4 78.05 CE 32 I 86 20.8 36.7 54.8 76.7 45.8 51 38.0 51.03 CE 32 I 86 11.1 30.0 45.8 59.5 60 51 39.6 54.83 CE 32 II 115 14.6 37.5 47.9 80.0 59.8 51 38.0 86.55 CE 32 I 74 22.9 14.6 42.9 76.7 57.6 51 42.0 41.44 CE 32 I 63 16.7 20.4 37.5 61.1 62.2 53.4 42.0 65.28 CE 64 II 39 22.2 37.0 41.7 70.0 55.4 45.4 42 70.43 CE 64 II 112 16.7 31.5 44.4 80.0 59 51 44 63.01 CE 64 I 122 22.2 20.4 35.8 70.8 59.8 54.2 38 55.73 CE 64 I 15 14.8 16.7 45.8 59.3 57.6 51 52 45.67 CE 64 I 117 20.8 12.5 37.5 48.3 59 51 48.0 82.73 CE 64 I 13 20.4 18.5 44.4 51.9 57.6 51 46.0 38.1 CE 64 I 5 14.8 28.3 35.7 42.9 65 49.6 38.0 46.68 CE 64 II 109 24.1 30.0 45.8 41.7 51.2 51 42.0 41.13 CE 128 I 84 11.1 35.2 35.7 75.0 57.8 49.6 41.2 85.29 CE 128 I 7 18.5 28.8 40.5 48.1 54.4 51 43.2 46.61 CE 128 I 95 9.5 18.8 31.3 43.9 63 63 52.0 55.14 CE 128 II 72 20.8 22.2 35.0 40.0 63 54.2 41.2 59.38 CE 128 I 119 24.1 33.3 55.6 33.3 57.6 45.4 39.6 39.69 CE 128 I 87 22.9 25.9 37.5 66.7 63 53.4 52.0 61.25 CE 128 II 74 33.3 22.9 35.4 57.4 56.2 51 42.0 44.21 CE 128 II 71 24.1 27.1 41.7 59.5 56.5 51 39.6 54.49
Page 1 and 2:
Gamma Rays and Carbon Ion-Beams Irr
Page 3 and 4:
Table of contents Chapter 1 1.1. In
Page 5 and 6:
4.2.1.1. Cultivars of banana……
Page 7 and 8:
and ‘Valery’, which are exporte
Page 9 and 10:
‘Cavendish Enano’, ‘Williams
Page 11 and 12:
Although it is now found only in Au
Page 13 and 14:
varieties bred at the Jamaican prog
Page 15 and 16:
such as ‘Paka’ (AA) and ‘Pisa
Page 17 and 18:
Resistance (PR). In connection with
Page 19 and 20:
large number of improved mutant cro
Page 21 and 22:
which migrated faster (Rf = 0.44) t
Page 23 and 24:
is juglone (5 hydroxy-1,4-napthoqui
Page 25 and 26:
experiments involving various biolo
Page 27 and 28:
Tanaka (1999) reported novel genes
Page 29 and 30:
2. 1. Materials and Methods Chapter
Page 31 and 32:
2. 1. 1. 4. FHIA-01 ‘FHIA-01’(M
Page 33 and 34:
(Gamma room)” and “Carbon ion-b
Page 35 and 36:
esulting from “Gamma Room” expe
Page 37 and 38:
traits as female sterility and part
Page 39 and 40:
3. 2. 1. 3. Chronic irradiation ( 1
Page 41 and 42:
Gy. ‘Williams’ and ‘Orito’
Page 43 and 44:
a diploid clone (genomic constituti
Page 45 and 46:
‘Williams’ (93%), the necrotic
Page 47 and 48:
etween the irradiation doses and th
Page 49 and 50:
moment they are at the development
Page 51 and 52:
A B C D Fig. 2. Cultivars of banana
Page 53 and 54:
Weight of plantlets (g) Height of p
Page 55 and 56:
Control 50 Gy 100 Gy 150 Gy Fig. 6.
Page 57 and 58:
Control 50 Gy 100 Gy 150 Gy 200 Gy
Page 59 and 60:
Survival rate (%) for LD50 Survival
Page 61 and 62:
A B C D E F Fig. 12. A plant from
Page 63 and 64:
B D AA E Fig 14. Banana meristems a
Page 65 and 66:
A B C Orito Orito Orito Cavendish E
Page 67 and 68:
No. plants No. plants No. plants No
Page 69 and 70:
Circunference (cm) Plant height (cm
Page 71 and 72:
Table 1. Differences of the plantle
Page 73 and 74:
Table 3. Differences of the surviva
Page 75 and 76: Table 5. Selected materials reporti
Page 77 and 78: Table 8. Factor of effectiveness an
Page 79 and 80: deletion rather than point mutation
Page 81 and 82: were recorded. From the results, th
Page 83 and 84: 4. 2. 2. Assessment of banana plant
Page 85 and 86: placement among the plants (Fig. 30
Page 87 and 88: hours, photographs of the leaf-disc
Page 89 and 90: ‘Williams’ (B) was obtained by
Page 91 and 92: class limits values are clearly sep
Page 93 and 94: values in ‘Cavendish Enano’ ran
Page 95 and 96: Only a partial resistance was obser
Page 97 and 98: Sigatoka but also fruit quality, po
Page 99 and 100: A C Fig. 23. Banana plantlets packa
Page 101 and 102: A C Fig. 25. Acclimatization of the
Page 103 and 104: A C Fig. 27. Survival plantlets for
Page 105 and 106: A C Fig. 29. Mycosphaerella fijiens
Page 107 and 108: A C Fig. 31. Labor during transplan
Page 109 and 110: B A Fig. 33. Establishment of the j
Page 111 and 112: A B Fig. 35. Regenerated plantlets
Page 113 and 114: Survival rate (%) for LD50 Survival
Page 115 and 116: 0 0.5 1 2 4 Fig 39. Banana plantlet
Page 117 and 118: A B C Fig. 41. Regenerated explants
Page 119 and 120: Range of optimum doses (Gy) 16 15 1
Page 121 and 122: Percent of plants Percent of plants
Page 123 and 124: LDNA-% LDNA-% DDP-days 100 80 60 40
Page 125: Fig. 49. Hexaploid cells in ‘Cave
Page 129 and 130: Table 12. DDP-days, II-% and LDNA-%
Page 131 and 132: Chapter 5 General Discussion Gamma
Page 133 and 134: FHIA-01 were not able to compare du
Page 135 and 136: ‘W 1 II 31’. In the case of ‘
Page 137 and 138: Summary Both Gamma rays and Carbon
Page 139 and 140: A ‘Cavendish Enano’ plant with
Page 141 and 142: I extend my gratitude also to Dr. K
Page 143 and 144: Cohan, J, P., C. Abadie, K. Tomekp
Page 145 and 146: Hase, Y., M. Yamaguchi and A. Tanak
Page 147 and 148: Molina, G. C. and J. P. Krausz (198
Page 149 and 150: Roux, N. S. (2001). Mutation induct
show all

Gamma Rays and CarbonIon-Beams Irradiation for Mutation ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?