19.06.2013 Views

Gamma Rays and CarbonIon-Beams Irradiation for Mutation ...

Gamma Rays and CarbonIon-Beams Irradiation for Mutation ...

Gamma Rays and CarbonIon-Beams Irradiation for Mutation ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

LDNA-%<br />

LDNA-%<br />

DDP-days<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

60<br />

55<br />

50<br />

45<br />

40<br />

35<br />

A<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

y = - 0 .18 0 3 x + 54 .3 17<br />

R 2 = 0 .13 6 2<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4 5<br />

6<br />

5<br />

4<br />

6<br />

Williams<br />

y = 1.3 19 5x + 1.6 6 4 4<br />

R 2 = 0 .2 4 55<br />

25 30 35 40 45 50 55<br />

B<br />

y = - 1.9 70 6 x + 14 7.6 9<br />

R 2 = 0 .12 9 3<br />

25 30 35 40 45 50 55<br />

Fig. 47. LDNA-% regression versus II-% (A), LDNA-% regression<br />

versus DDP-days (B) <strong>and</strong> DDP-days regression versus II-% (C)<br />

in ‘Williams’. Values in bold triangles with the code number ‘W<br />

16 II 74’ (1), ‘W 128 I 67’(2), ‘W 1 II 148’(3), ‘W 8 II 13’(4),<br />

‘W 1 II 19’(5) <strong>and</strong> ‘W 1 II 31’(6) clearly shows relationships<br />

within the three combinations of the variables.<br />

118<br />

II-%<br />

II-%<br />

5<br />

6 4 2<br />

3<br />

38 41 44 47 50 53 56<br />

C<br />

DDP-days<br />

1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!