01.07.2013 Views

THE FUTURE OF MONEY Bernard A. Lietaer - library.uniteddiversity ...

THE FUTURE OF MONEY Bernard A. Lietaer - library.uniteddiversity ...

THE FUTURE OF MONEY Bernard A. Lietaer - library.uniteddiversity ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

mysteries of the universe they live in. During their evenings<br />

mesmerised in front of the TV, children today find the equivalent of<br />

myths, story telling and elders' chants in initiation caverns. 'One<br />

could say that the chant has been replaced by the TV show, but at the<br />

core of each show, driving the action, and determining whether or<br />

not the show will survive the season, is the advertisement. What is<br />

the effect on our children? Before a child enters first grade class, and<br />

before entering in any real way into our religious ceremonies, a child<br />

will have soaked up 30 thousand advertisements. None of us feels<br />

very good about this, but for the most part we ignore it. It's<br />

background noise. We learned to accept it so long ago that we hardly<br />

think about it any more. But at the deeper level, what we need to<br />

confront is the power of` the advertiser to promulgate a world-view,<br />

a mini-cosmology based on dissatisfaction and craving. One of the<br />

clichés for how to construct an ad captures the point succinctly: 'an<br />

ad's job is to make them unhappy with what they have. In short,<br />

values are not inborn but a cultural creation, and our culture has<br />

become saturated by the corporate advertiser's agenda (see sidebar<br />

on advertising everywhere). The net result is that materialism and<br />

consumerism has become the real religion and world-view that gets<br />

inculcated in contemporary children.<br />

Notice that here again we do not even need a dark conspiracy for<br />

any of this to happen. During the heydays of the 1950s and 1960s,<br />

broadcast technology did not enable broadcasters to charge<br />

consumers directly. So they charged advertisers for time used to<br />

expose viewers to ads interwoven with programmes. ‘This created a<br />

bias towards lowest-common- denominator programming. Consider<br />

two programmes, one which will fascinate 500,000 people, and the<br />

other which 30 million people will watch as slightly preferable to<br />

watching their ceiling.' If the advertisers pay for the programme, they<br />

will prefer the mass audience because its degree of interest in the<br />

programme has little relationship to the effectiveness of the ad. If the<br />

viewers were to pay, they might very well get the niche programme.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!