13.07.2013 Views

an epidemiological study of listeriosis in dairy cattle

an epidemiological study of listeriosis in dairy cattle

an epidemiological study of listeriosis in dairy cattle

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

suppression <strong>of</strong> the growth <strong>of</strong> Listeria org<strong>an</strong>isms is lifted, result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> rapid<br />

multiplication <strong>of</strong> L. monocytogenes to the level <strong>of</strong> the <strong>in</strong>fectious dose (Gronstol 1979a,<br />

Anon 1983, Fenlon 1988, Husu <strong>an</strong>d others 1990a, Sargison 1993). It has been<br />

demonstrated that the multiplication <strong>of</strong> L. monocytogenes is related to pH. As pH rises<br />

the number <strong>an</strong>d frequency <strong>of</strong> isolation <strong>of</strong> L. monocytogenes also <strong>in</strong>creases (Irv<strong>in</strong> 1968,<br />

Gronstol 1979b, Fenlon 1988). As import<strong>an</strong>t as silage quality is the method or methods<br />

<strong>of</strong> feed<strong>in</strong>g silage. Some cl<strong>in</strong>ical forms <strong>of</strong> Listeriosis (encephalitis, iritis) have been<br />

attributed to physical <strong>in</strong>juries <strong>of</strong> mucosal membr<strong>an</strong>es such as buccal or conjunctival<br />

membr<strong>an</strong>es caused by rough forages (Asahi 1957, Dennis 1993). These facts prompted<br />

us to further evaluate the role <strong>of</strong> silage by gather<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>formation on preparation, the<br />

method <strong>an</strong>d time <strong>of</strong> feed<strong>in</strong>g <strong>an</strong>d quality. This was done for both grass silage <strong>an</strong>d maize<br />

silage.<br />

The stage <strong>of</strong> growth or time <strong>of</strong> cutt<strong>in</strong>g grass for silage is known to be import<strong>an</strong>t.<br />

(Anon 1983, Wilesmith <strong>an</strong>d Gitter 1986, Gitter 1989). To ensure perfect fermentation<br />

grass must be harvested at the right stage when it conta<strong>in</strong>s a sufficient level <strong>of</strong><br />

carbohydrates <strong>an</strong>d has a Digestibility (D) value around 70%. This covers the period<br />

between May, June <strong>an</strong>d July (Anon 1983). In our <strong>study</strong> there was no association<br />

between the month <strong>of</strong> mak<strong>in</strong>g silage <strong>an</strong>d disease. This may be expla<strong>in</strong>ed by the fact that<br />

most <strong>of</strong> the farms (90%) made silage with<strong>in</strong> the recommended period (May <strong>an</strong>d June for<br />

grass silage or October for maize silage). However the number <strong>of</strong> times the grass was<br />

cut to make grass silage was associated with <strong>an</strong> <strong>in</strong>creased risk <strong>of</strong> Listeriosis <strong>in</strong> milk<strong>in</strong>g<br />

cows. It is known that first cut grass silage achieves better fermentation (Fenlon 1988)<br />

but second or later cuts grass may lack the necessary components (high sugar, correct<br />

dry matter level, 25-30%) to achieve optimal fermentation (Anon 1983, Fenlon 1988).<br />

Another import<strong>an</strong>t factor at cutt<strong>in</strong>g which helps determ<strong>in</strong>e silage quality is soil<br />

contam<strong>in</strong>ation. Soil causes butyric acid fermentation which results <strong>in</strong> higher pH values<br />

99

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!