13.07.2013 Views

an epidemiological study of listeriosis in dairy cattle

an epidemiological study of listeriosis in dairy cattle

an epidemiological study of listeriosis in dairy cattle

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1988, Husu 1990) <strong>an</strong>d from zero to all <strong>an</strong>imals on different farms (Skovgaar <strong>an</strong>d<br />

Morgen 1988, Husu 1990). The use <strong>of</strong> different culture techniques <strong>an</strong>d media has been<br />

suggested as a reason for these different frequencies (Husu 1990) <strong>an</strong>d the difference<br />

between the farms has been attributed to different feed<strong>in</strong>g practices (Skovgaar <strong>an</strong>d<br />

Morgen 1988, Husu 1990).<br />

In this <strong>study</strong> too, there were differences between the farms <strong>in</strong> the proportion <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>an</strong>imals positive for Listeria spp. <strong>an</strong>d L. monocytogenes. It varied from 48% <strong>of</strong> cows on<br />

farm D to 89.1% on farm E for Listeria spp. <strong>an</strong>d from 28.2% <strong>of</strong> cows on farm D to<br />

79.3% on farm B for L. monocytogenes. Similarly differences <strong>in</strong> the monthly frequency<br />

<strong>of</strong> excretion were also observed between the farms <strong>in</strong> this <strong>study</strong>. The monthly frequency<br />

<strong>of</strong> excretion reported here showed a seasonal pattern but there were two dist<strong>in</strong>ct patterns<br />

<strong>of</strong> excretion. The first pattern seen on farms A, B <strong>an</strong>d E was characterised by the high<br />

frequency <strong>of</strong> excretion between October <strong>an</strong>d May. This was similar to the pattern<br />

observed <strong>in</strong> our pilot <strong>study</strong> (Chapter 5). This seasonality is also similar to that reported<br />

for cl<strong>in</strong>ical <strong>listeriosis</strong> (Chapter 2). A similar seasonality <strong>of</strong> excretion <strong>of</strong> Listeria spp. <strong>an</strong>d<br />

L. monocytogenes <strong>in</strong> faeces was also reported by Husu (1990). However the frequency<br />

<strong>of</strong> excretion reported <strong>in</strong> our <strong>study</strong> was much higher th<strong>an</strong> those observed by Husu<br />

(1990), where the excretion rates for L. monocytogenes were 0.9 % (3.5% for Listeria<br />

spp.) <strong>in</strong> September <strong>an</strong>d 16.1% <strong>in</strong> December (19.4% for Listeria spp.).<br />

In contrast to the first group <strong>of</strong> the farms, the excretion rates on farms C <strong>an</strong>d D<br />

were lower especially between October <strong>an</strong>d April. The use <strong>of</strong> different culture<br />

techniques would not expla<strong>in</strong> the differences seen between the farms <strong>in</strong> this <strong>study</strong><br />

because the same culture technique was used throughout the <strong>study</strong>. There are a number<br />

<strong>of</strong> possible expl<strong>an</strong>ations for these differences between farms. They may be related to the<br />

stra<strong>in</strong>s <strong>of</strong> org<strong>an</strong>ism, the systems <strong>of</strong> husb<strong>an</strong>dry or the proportion <strong>of</strong> susceptible <strong>an</strong>imals.<br />

The difference <strong>in</strong> frequency <strong>of</strong> excretion may also be expla<strong>in</strong>ed by the absence <strong>of</strong> some<br />

207

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!