13.07.2013 Views

an epidemiological study of listeriosis in dairy cattle

an epidemiological study of listeriosis in dairy cattle

an epidemiological study of listeriosis in dairy cattle

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Bacterial culture is widely used for the diagnosis <strong>of</strong> Listeriosis along with other<br />

tests. Several selective <strong>an</strong>d non-selective culture media have been developed for<br />

detect<strong>in</strong>g L. monocytogenes <strong>in</strong> food (Curtis <strong>an</strong>d others 1995) <strong>an</strong>d these have been used<br />

for isolat<strong>in</strong>g L. monocytogenes from cl<strong>in</strong>ical specimens (Gray <strong>an</strong>d others 1948, Gray<br />

<strong>an</strong>d Kill<strong>in</strong>ger 1966, Eld <strong>an</strong>d others 1993). However, the value <strong>of</strong> bacteriological culture<br />

is disputable, because isolation <strong>of</strong> L. monocytogenes from cl<strong>in</strong>ical specimens does not<br />

necessarily reflect disease due to the fact that successful isolation from bra<strong>in</strong> <strong>an</strong>d faeces<br />

<strong>of</strong> healthy <strong>an</strong>imals have been reported (Gronstol 1980b, Husu 1990).<br />

Histopathologic exam<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> org<strong>an</strong>s, especially bra<strong>in</strong>s, <strong>of</strong> Listeria <strong>in</strong>fected<br />

cases is currently the most reliable method for diagnosis <strong>of</strong> listeric encephalitis.<br />

Immunocytochemical techniques (peroxidase-<strong>an</strong>tiperoxidase) us<strong>in</strong>g polyclonal<br />

sera (Dom<strong>in</strong>go <strong>an</strong>d others 1986, Marco <strong>an</strong>d others 1988, Johnson <strong>an</strong>d others 1995) have<br />

been used <strong>an</strong>d compared with bacterial culture methods <strong>in</strong> the veter<strong>in</strong>ary field. Johnson<br />

<strong>an</strong>d others (1995) have reported the superiority <strong>of</strong> this technique over bacterial culture<br />

but the use <strong>of</strong> polyclonal <strong>an</strong>ti-sera must be regarded with caution because <strong>of</strong> cross-<br />

reaction with other Gram positive org<strong>an</strong>isms (Low <strong>an</strong>d Donachie 1997). McLauchl<strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>an</strong>d colleagues (1989) have used this technique us<strong>in</strong>g monoclonal sera <strong>in</strong> diagnosis <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>listeriosis</strong> <strong>in</strong> people, but this is not used <strong>in</strong> the veter<strong>in</strong>ary field. An immun<strong>of</strong>luoroscent<br />

test us<strong>in</strong>g polyclonal <strong>an</strong>ti-sera has also been used for diagnosis (Evel<strong>an</strong>d 1963) but this<br />

test faces the same problems associated with polyclonal <strong>an</strong>ti - sera.<br />

Serological tests are the only tools that c<strong>an</strong> be used to detect L. monocytogenes<br />

<strong>in</strong>fection or traces <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>fection <strong>in</strong> live <strong>an</strong>imals. Complement fixation, agglut<strong>in</strong>ation,<br />

haemagglut<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>an</strong>d precipitation tests (Gray <strong>an</strong>d Kill<strong>in</strong>ger 1966) have been used but<br />

lack the predictive value needed for diagnostic use. These tests employ either crude<br />

cells or somatic (O) <strong>an</strong>d flagellar (H) <strong>an</strong>tigen. These <strong>an</strong>tigens have been proved to cross<br />

react with other Gram positive bacteria such as streptococci, staphylococci <strong>an</strong>d<br />

32

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!