13.07.2013 Views

an epidemiological study of listeriosis in dairy cattle

an epidemiological study of listeriosis in dairy cattle

an epidemiological study of listeriosis in dairy cattle

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Investigat<strong>in</strong>g Non-specific B<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs : Some non-specific b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g was still detectable<br />

when BSA, Marvel or Pig Album<strong>in</strong> were used whereas this was not detectable when<br />

FCS was used. FCS was used <strong>in</strong> the block<strong>in</strong>g step <strong>in</strong> all subsequent tests.<br />

Investigat<strong>in</strong>g Specificity <strong>of</strong> ELISA: Absorption <strong>of</strong> hyper-immune serum to L.<br />

monocytogenes with CP-LLO <strong>an</strong>d culture supernat<strong>an</strong>t abolished the <strong>an</strong>tibody activity.<br />

Table 5. 10. <strong>in</strong>dicates that <strong>an</strong>tigen-<strong>an</strong>tibody b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g was specific.<br />

Table 5. 10. Plate pl<strong>an</strong> <strong>an</strong>d Optical densities<br />

SD B Sample serum St<strong>an</strong>dard Goat hyper-immune serum B<br />

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12<br />

2 0.055 0.059 0.078 0.063 0.505 0.800 0.833 0.056 0.289 0.057 0.465 0.048<br />

4 0.055 0.058 0.068 0.060 0.554 0.696 0.736 0.058 0.236 0.055 0.406 0.049<br />

8 0.055 0.058 0.061 0.057 0.214 0.568 0.630 0.057 0.173 0.057 0.306 0.051<br />

16 0.055 0.058 0.061 0.058 0.163 0.523 0.493 0.057 0.115 0.057 0.271 0.052<br />

32 0.055 0.057 0.059 0.058 0.121 0.361 0.344 0.057 0.094 0.057 0.211 0.052<br />

64 0.055 0.058 0.058 0.058 0.090 0.268 0.239 0.055 0.075 0.055 0.150 0.052<br />

128 0.052 0.055 0.055 0.056 0.071 0.055 0.054 0.054 0.065 0.054 0.114 0.052<br />

256 0.054 0.055 0.055 0.054 0.062 0.054 0.054 0.054 0.061 0.056 0.86 0.050<br />

SD Serum dilution, B Bl<strong>an</strong>k, Columns 2 <strong>an</strong>d 8 treated with LLO, Columns 3 <strong>an</strong>d 9 treated with culture<br />

supernat<strong>an</strong>t, Columns 4 <strong>an</strong>d 10 heat killed Listeria org<strong>an</strong>isms, Columns 5 <strong>an</strong>d 11 untreated serum<br />

(control).<br />

Immune Status <strong>of</strong> the <strong>an</strong>imals (a field trial <strong>of</strong> the ELISA) : Blood samples were taken<br />

only once from 77 <strong>an</strong>imals. The OD values obta<strong>in</strong>ed were converted to Log values <strong>an</strong>d<br />

then the relationship between age, bacteriological results <strong>an</strong>d <strong>an</strong>tibody level was<br />

<strong>in</strong>vestigated. When <strong>an</strong>imals were grouped by the frequency <strong>of</strong> be<strong>in</strong>g positive for<br />

Listeria there was a negative correlation between the frequency <strong>of</strong> detection <strong>of</strong><br />

Listeria <strong>an</strong>d the concentration <strong>of</strong> the <strong>an</strong>tibody to Listeria. This was statistically<br />

signific<strong>an</strong>t (Pearson’s correlation coefficient = -0.35, 95% CL -0.54-0.13, P=0.03).<br />

Animals that became positive for Listeria on 6 <strong>an</strong>d 7 occasions were excluded because<br />

there were very small numbers <strong>in</strong> these groups (Table 5. 11).<br />

151

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!