13.07.2013 Views

an epidemiological study of listeriosis in dairy cattle

an epidemiological study of listeriosis in dairy cattle

an epidemiological study of listeriosis in dairy cattle

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Table 6. 11. Isolation <strong>of</strong> Listeria spp. from the environment on Farm A.<br />

Months<br />

Samples A S O N D J F M A M<br />

Soil 0 0 0 0 Li 0 Li 0 0 0<br />

Grass 0 0 Lm Lm Li 0 Lm 0 Lm Lm<br />

Water 0 0 Lm Li Lm Lm Lm Lm Lm 0<br />

Milk 0 0 0 0 0 Li Li Lm Lm ND<br />

G. Silage NF NF Li 0 Li Li Lm Lm Lm NF<br />

M. Silage NF NF NF NF NF Lm Lm Ls Lm NF<br />

Bedd<strong>in</strong>g NH NH NH Lm Lm Li Lm Lm Lm NH<br />

Lm L. monocytogenes, Li L. <strong>in</strong>nocua, Ls L. seeligeri, ND not done, NF not fed, NH not housed.<br />

Farm B:<br />

a) Faecal samples:<br />

A total <strong>of</strong> 111 <strong>an</strong>imals were exam<strong>in</strong>ed throughout the <strong>study</strong> period. 79.3%<br />

(88/111) <strong>of</strong> the <strong>an</strong>imals excreted L. monocytogenes, 7.2% (8/111) other Listeria spp.<br />

<strong>an</strong>d the rest did not shed Listeria (14.4%, 15/111) dur<strong>in</strong>g their participation <strong>in</strong> the <strong>study</strong>.<br />

Only 54.1% (60/111) <strong>of</strong> the milk<strong>in</strong>g cows were exam<strong>in</strong>ed at all visits. When only these<br />

<strong>an</strong>imals were taken <strong>in</strong>to account, the proportion <strong>of</strong> <strong>an</strong>imals shedd<strong>in</strong>g L. monocytogenes<br />

was 98.3% (59/60). The rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>an</strong>imal shed <strong>an</strong>other species <strong>of</strong> Listeria.<br />

The monthly proportion <strong>of</strong> <strong>an</strong>imals shedd<strong>in</strong>g Listeria spp. varied from 11.4 % <strong>in</strong><br />

September to 96.3% <strong>in</strong> J<strong>an</strong>uary. A higher proportion <strong>of</strong> <strong>an</strong>imals were shedd<strong>in</strong>g Listeria<br />

org<strong>an</strong>isms <strong>in</strong> their faeces between October <strong>an</strong>d May with a peak <strong>of</strong> 96.3% <strong>in</strong> J<strong>an</strong>uary<br />

<strong>an</strong>d February. For L. monocytogenes <strong>an</strong>d L. <strong>in</strong>nocua there was a fluctuat<strong>in</strong>g rise. The<br />

highest proportion <strong>of</strong> <strong>an</strong>imals excret<strong>in</strong>g L. monocytogenes <strong>an</strong>d L. <strong>in</strong>nocua was <strong>in</strong><br />

February (81.8%) <strong>an</strong>d March (62.5%) respectively. The proportion decreased thereafter<br />

(Figure 6. 3). There was statistically a signific<strong>an</strong>t difference between the monthly<br />

178

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!