13.07.2013 Views

an epidemiological study of listeriosis in dairy cattle

an epidemiological study of listeriosis in dairy cattle

an epidemiological study of listeriosis in dairy cattle

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The number <strong>of</strong> new cases each month <strong>an</strong>d the monthly <strong>in</strong>cidence rate (i.e. the<br />

number <strong>of</strong> new cases per 100 <strong>an</strong>imal-months at risk) were calculated separately for each<br />

farm (Table 6. 16 <strong>an</strong>d Figure 6. 7).<br />

On Farm A there was a gradual <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>cidence rate until all <strong>an</strong>imals had<br />

become <strong>in</strong>fected. The maximum number <strong>of</strong> cases <strong>in</strong> <strong>an</strong>y month occurred <strong>in</strong> J<strong>an</strong>uary.<br />

On Farm B there were two peaks; for the <strong>in</strong>cidence rate these occurred <strong>in</strong><br />

November <strong>an</strong>d February <strong>an</strong>d for the number <strong>of</strong> new cases November <strong>an</strong>d J<strong>an</strong>uary.<br />

December.<br />

On Farm E there was a peak <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>cidence rate <strong>an</strong>d number <strong>of</strong> new cases <strong>in</strong><br />

On Farm C the <strong>in</strong>cidence rate showed a small peak <strong>in</strong> March. The number <strong>of</strong><br />

new cases was small with a slight <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> September <strong>an</strong>d highest <strong>in</strong> March.<br />

On Farm D the <strong>in</strong>cidence rate showed peaks <strong>in</strong> October <strong>an</strong>d March <strong>an</strong>d the<br />

number <strong>of</strong> new cases follows a similar pattern.<br />

When compared with m<strong>an</strong>agement variables the data provide further support for<br />

the association between maize silage feed<strong>in</strong>g <strong>an</strong>d faecal shedd<strong>in</strong>g seen us<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

prevalence data. The <strong>in</strong>troduction <strong>of</strong> maize silage <strong>in</strong> October on Farms B <strong>an</strong>d E is<br />

associated with rapid rise <strong>in</strong> the number <strong>of</strong> faecal shedders <strong>an</strong>d <strong>in</strong>cidence rate. On farm<br />

A where maize silage was <strong>in</strong>troduced <strong>in</strong> J<strong>an</strong>uary the epidemic curve is less steep<br />

between hous<strong>in</strong>g <strong>an</strong>d the <strong>in</strong>troduction <strong>of</strong> maize silage<br />

Table 6. 16. Incidence rate <strong>of</strong> L. monocytogenes <strong>in</strong>fection by month.<br />

Visit Farm A (%) Farm B (%) Farm C (%) Farm D (%) Farm E (%)<br />

191

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!