22.07.2013 Views

I Chose Liberty - Ludwig von Mises Institute

I Chose Liberty - Ludwig von Mises Institute

I Chose Liberty - Ludwig von Mises Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

156 I <strong>Chose</strong> <strong>Liberty</strong>: Autobiographies of Contemporary Libertarians<br />

might emerge with the market, and then assume that an omniscient and benevolent government<br />

would do what was required to solve those problems, the public choice approach<br />

looks at the information available to those in government and analyzes the incentives they<br />

face to determine how they will act. I found this approach to the economics of government<br />

very revealing.<br />

One of the books we used in my special topics class was The Calculus of Consent by<br />

James Buchanan and Gordon Tullock. Buchanan and Tullock had recently established a<br />

Center for the Study of Public Choice at Virginia Tech, and I went to graduate school at<br />

Virginia Tech specifically because I wanted to study under them. I was not alone. A number<br />

of my classmates went to Virginia Tech to study under Buchanan and Tullock, and as a<br />

graduate student I was introduced to the ideas of Austrian economics and libertarian politics<br />

by my fellow graduate students.<br />

The two classmates who had the biggest influence on me were John Metcalf (who is<br />

now an attorney in Jacksonville, Florida) and Jack High, who subsequently earned a Ph.D.<br />

in economics from UCLA and has been a leading figure in the resurgence of the Austrian<br />

school. Jack had the largest influence on me because he took a lot of time to introduce me<br />

to ideas, suggest reading material to me, and he was willing to endlessly discuss those ideas<br />

with me. On the recommendation of Jack and other classmates, I read <strong>Mises</strong>, Hayek,<br />

Rothbard, Rand, and others, and my eyes were opened.<br />

The ideas of each of those writers had substantial appeal, but the whole was more than<br />

the sum of its parts. Thanks to Jack and John and a few other classmates, I discovered that<br />

there was a substantial and long-standing intellectual foundation underlying free-market<br />

economics and libertarian politics. I had thought my anti-socialist views to be anti-intellectual<br />

because I was completely unaware of the substantial intellectual output of libertarian writers<br />

and the Austrian school. I was never introduced to it as an undergraduate, and it was certainly<br />

not a part of the graduate curriculum. But my classmates in graduate school were<br />

very interested in the Austrian school, and I did a lot of outside reading. More than once<br />

I recall annoying my professors by arguing the ideas of the Austrian business cycle in<br />

macroeconomics, or arguing the merits of privatizing government activities in public finance<br />

class. And I remember as if it was yesterday Gordon Tullock telling me that I would never<br />

be able to find a job because of my extreme libertarian views. (I can smile about this now,<br />

because I am a tenured professor.) I had entered graduate school as an economist, wanting<br />

to learn more, but thanks to the education I got from my classmates, I left as a libertarian<br />

with a good Austrian background.<br />

Jack High, John Metcalf, and I attended the now-legendary Austrian economics conference<br />

in South Royalton, Vermont, in 1974. The faculty at that conference was composed<br />

of Murray Rothbard, Israel Kirzner, and <strong>Ludwig</strong> Lachmann. I had read Rothbard’s and<br />

Kirzner’s work before, and meeting them was wonderful. Meeting Murray was especially<br />

memorable. From reading his work, I pictured him as a serious and bitter man, but in person<br />

he was as jolly as Santa Claus! He loved to stay up late telling wonderful stories, and anybody<br />

who knew him will tell you he was very a funny man. Listening to Murray was always a<br />

delight. Israel was more the serious scholar, but very warm and generous. Over the years I<br />

sent him some of my work hoping for comments, and he was always kind and helpful.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!