22.07.2013 Views

I Chose Liberty - Ludwig von Mises Institute

I Chose Liberty - Ludwig von Mises Institute

I Chose Liberty - Ludwig von Mises Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

268 I <strong>Chose</strong> <strong>Liberty</strong>: Autobiographies of Contemporary Libertarians<br />

Michael and I hit it off debating gun control, socialism, taxation, the proper role of<br />

government, etc. He patiently and lucidly dismantled every objection I offered to libertarian<br />

thinking, especially the non-aggression principle. To my further dismay, he showed how<br />

libertarian approaches were generally better solutions to practical problems as well, such as<br />

supplying medical options to people of very restricted means.<br />

After I shook off my somnambulistic adherence to the ideology I inherited from my<br />

“education,” he introduced me to Walter Block and Murray Rothbard. The first book I<br />

read on libertarian philosophy was Walter’s Defending the Undefendable, a giddy joyride in<br />

logic and principle. These erudite thinkers took an interest in a pinko with lots of questions,<br />

and encouraged me to pursue my studies for a Ph.D. in psychology.<br />

After reading and rethinking many premises I held about society, morality, and<br />

plain old justice, such as the right of a third party to forcibly intervene between consenting<br />

adults, the discussions with Murray, Michael, and Walter caused me to be somewhat<br />

of an anomaly among psychologists and colleagues (a mostly socialist lot). For this, I<br />

thank them.<br />

As with Albert Ellis, a psychology mentor, Rothbard, Block, and Edelstein have challenged<br />

my dogmas forthrightly, and I consider them mentors too. OK, mentors from Hell,<br />

but still.<br />

For Murray’s 60th birthday party presented by the <strong>Mises</strong> <strong>Institute</strong> at the Waldorf, I<br />

played the part of the young Murray in his play, “Mozart was a Red.” This was Murray’s<br />

satirical take on Ayn Rand’s Objectivists, a group he once attended. I played him as a genial<br />

Everyman surrounded by rigid dogmatists who lambasted him for asking innocent, but<br />

penetrating questions. It got great laughs, and Murray took this surprise rendition of his<br />

dormant play with great humor.<br />

I later did a stand-up routine that roasted him with my imitation, recounting some<br />

of the experiences I had with him, such as the ancient fakir incident. He took all this<br />

attention graciously, and shook my hand as I passed him by. Years later, I attended a<br />

lecture given by Bill Bradford, editor of <strong>Liberty</strong>, and in the middle of it, he paused,<br />

pointed me out and shouted, “You’re Murray Rothbard! You’re great!” The audience was<br />

left to wonder.<br />

So how did Murray handle the unengaged students? At a Chinese restaurant on the<br />

Upper West Side with Murray and a few of his acolytes, I asked him how he stayed so<br />

cheerful and humorous despite the minimal classroom response. He laughed and said,<br />

“I lay it out as I see it and I figure that if they get it, great. If they don’t? Ha! The heck<br />

with ’em!” <br />

Nando Pelusi, Ph.D., is a psychologist in private practice in New York City.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!