22.07.2013 Views

I Chose Liberty - Ludwig von Mises Institute

I Chose Liberty - Ludwig von Mises Institute

I Chose Liberty - Ludwig von Mises Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

James V. Schall 315<br />

including visits to his home, meetings with him in his office at Brooklyn Polytechnic<br />

<strong>Institute</strong>, and arranging for him to address the graduate economics faculty and students at<br />

Rutgers. Rothbard also encouraged me to write a review essay on David Friedman’s book,<br />

The Machinery of Freedom, for The Libertarian Forum, and this became my first publication.<br />

Thus when I disembarked from Don Lavoie’s car in South Royalton, Vermont in June 1974<br />

to attend the first Austrian economics conference to be convened in the United States, I,<br />

like Don and most of the other attendees, had arrived by way of Murray Rothbard. <br />

Joseph T. Salerno is professor of economics at Pace University, editor of the Quarterly Journal of<br />

Austrian Economics, and academic vice president at the <strong>Mises</strong> <strong>Institute</strong>.<br />

65<br />

JAMES V. SCHALL<br />

CONFESSIONS OF A PRACTICING “SOCIALIST”<br />

Socialists are collectivist in their proposals. But they are Communist in<br />

their idealism. Now there is a real pleasure in sharing. We have all felt it<br />

in the case of nuts off a tree or the National Gallery, or such things. But<br />

it is not the only pleasure nor the only altruistic pleasure, nor (I think) the<br />

highest or most human of altruistic pleasures. I greatly prefer the pleasure<br />

of giving and receiving. Giving is not the same as sharing: giving is even<br />

the opposite of sharing. Sharing is based on the idea that there is no property,<br />

or at least no personal property. But giving a thing to another man<br />

is as much based on personal property as keeping it to yourself.<br />

~ G.K. Chesterton, ”Why I Am Not a Socialist” (1908)<br />

When I am asked, “how does capitalism work?”, I like to recount something I read in<br />

Andrew Beyer, the turf commentator for The Washington Post (June 20, 2003). Beyer had<br />

noted the sudden increase in interest in thoroughbred racing after the surprising run of<br />

Funny Cide in the first two legs of the Triple Crown (2003). Some 101,864 fans showed<br />

up on a terribly rainy and chilly day for the Belmont Stakes, the third event of the series,<br />

the chance for the first winner of the three races—the Kentucky Derby, the Preakness, the<br />

Belmont—in over a quarter century. Track owners naturally have been seeking to capitalize<br />

on this increased interest in racing. They see it as a way both to help the business and to<br />

make a profit. They are legitimate capitalists using their minds to expand their business.<br />

But how to make it work is also a legitimate and essential capitalist question.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!