22.07.2013 Views

I Chose Liberty - Ludwig von Mises Institute

I Chose Liberty - Ludwig von Mises Institute

I Chose Liberty - Ludwig von Mises Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

22 I <strong>Chose</strong> <strong>Liberty</strong>: Autobiographies of Contemporary Libertarians<br />

girls singing “A is A” but I did find out that Rand had done a New York play once. I was<br />

pleased it wasn’t being performed.<br />

New York, the home of American Leftism, did seem a wonderfully free place. I bought<br />

copies of the National Review (I didn’t know then how awful neoconservatism was) and regularly<br />

read the Wall Street Journal. I even took a tourist trip around the stock exchange. I was<br />

also invited to a July 4th party. I had to point out to the host that as a good conservative I<br />

didn’t normally commemorate armed uprising against lawfully established authority, but I<br />

would make an exception in America’s case. However, I never was a conservative and I reestablished<br />

my libertarian credentials with an eloquent defense of the Articles of Confederation.<br />

Closer to home, the other event of the 70s that had long term significance was Britain’s<br />

entry into Europe, the European Economic Community (EEC), as it was then called. I was<br />

never an admirer of European integration despite the EEC’s original free market credentials.<br />

I was very much impressed by <strong>Ludwig</strong> Erhard’s (the great post-war German free market<br />

leader) critique of its inexorable tendency toward centralization. Britain had entered the<br />

EEC under the Conservatives in 1973 but the 1974 Labour Government had a referendum<br />

in 1975 on whether we should stay in. Many of their supporters feared that the EEC was<br />

a capitalist plot. Although I knew about rational choice theory and the irrationality of voting,<br />

I played the democrat. The polling booth was on my way to work and voting would<br />

not involve too great a cost. I voted to stay in mainly because I was terrified of British<br />

socialism. It really did look as if we were headed for the Gulag. And the Europeans seemed<br />

so much freer—and richer. Now I am associated with the Euroskeptics and write long<br />

articles on the benefits of “competitive jurisdictions” and against Europe’s regulatory socialism<br />

and centralization. It is no surprise that the Labour Party and the other socialists are<br />

now all very pro-Europe. It took them a long time to realize it but the (now) European<br />

Union is not a capitalist plot but a socialist project and a rent-seeker’s paradise. I am not<br />

really a Euroskeptic but a firm believer in withdrawal—for Britain and every other freedomloving<br />

European country. Europe now is like we British were in the 1970s.<br />

But at last the 80s came along—the much-maligned “decade of greed.” It was good<br />

for me and the rest of the world. For a few months I really thought that capitalism and<br />

freedom were becoming popular. It was the best modern example of Bernard Mandeville’s<br />

famous paradox of “private vice and public virtue.” For everybody was for the first time<br />

concerned with getting rich and behaving selfishly. As Mandeville said, back in 1705: “Each<br />

part was full of vice/But the whole an earthly paradise.”<br />

I know libertarians have written at great length about the errors of Ronald Reagan and<br />

Margaret Thatcher but for me, having been raised on welfare and socialism, those two<br />

brought a new beginning. Mrs. Thatcher defeated the trade unions, privatized much of the<br />

economy and began an (unsuccessful) cutback on welfare. And she also once famously said:<br />

“There is no such thing as society.” Of course, nothing much changed in the US and the<br />

UK in many areas but psychologically the era was very significant.<br />

And it was good for me, too. I wrote a textbook on political theory which had a definite<br />

libertarian stance. There was no other text that had Rothbard in the index, though Nozick<br />

was creeping into some. There was an up and coming young political theorist from Oxford<br />

who gave it a terrible review in The Times Literary Supplement. He said it was just free

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!