24.07.2013 Views

Planning - Summary of all comments - Amazon Web Services

Planning - Summary of all comments - Amazon Web Services

Planning - Summary of all comments - Amazon Web Services

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

078 David & Jeanne<br />

079 Mrs S Clark<br />

081 T S Papworth<br />

083 Mr F T Russell<br />

084 Miss M Andrews<br />

085 C G Tabar<br />

086 Mr M Gorman<br />

087 Mr I Walker<br />

Following the large development <strong>of</strong> "Etheldores" when after many years will Plumberow Avenue be repaired and re surfaced<br />

following the heavy lorries that did <strong>all</strong> the damage. I take it that they <strong>all</strong> pay the Council Tax and that has gone in the ?<br />

How about putting something back into the community?<br />

I don't want airport expansion. Cycle routes should be extended. Definitely not an incinerator, but exansion <strong>of</strong> libraries<br />

would be very welcome. I would welcome a green burial site. We need a new secondary school. I don't believe we should<br />

have to make way for so much new housing in this congested area. It is most undesirable. Green belt land is our heritage<br />

and must be protected at <strong>all</strong> cost, as must our woodland.<br />

Rochford road infrastructure could surely not cope with even more traffic. I would have to move out <strong>of</strong> the area or sell up if<br />

it gets worse than it is already. The traffic was awful in 1994 and since moveing back here it has been ridiculous. Please<br />

consider Rawreth instead! Travel to work is disrupted daily by congestion. Living on them busy routes becomes a health<br />

and safety issue.<br />

Our children will not know what a field is. We re<strong>all</strong>y do not need any more housing within the Rayleigh, Rochford, Hockley<br />

and Ashingdon area. Every time a building is demolised in Rochford or Rayleigh flats appear under the banner <strong>of</strong><br />

"affordable housing". It seems that anything will get built under this pretence <strong>of</strong> being cheap, affordable or retirement<br />

homes. Anything is cheap and affordable if you have the money. A substantial amount <strong>of</strong> new flats are being built in the<br />

heart <strong>of</strong> Rochford, coupled with a supermarket and new library. The supermarket we need, possibly the library, but not the<br />

100-odd flats that go with the deal. I believe the thinking was that the people who buy these would either not have a car <strong>of</strong><br />

go to work on public transport. Brilliant idea in a perfect world, but we know this doesn't happen. Presumably they are<br />

<strong>all</strong>ocated one parking space each, but if they have two cars to a househuld, where does the overflow go? In the local<br />

roads? The boundaries at Rayleigh are being pushed to their limits. I remember when you could stand at the top <strong>of</strong> London<br />

Could some funding be made to improve existing schools as well as improve new schools if required. To improve facilities<br />

for primary and secondary education.<br />

The Rochford area will be under pressure from Soutnend for development. It will be difficult to resist - Each project must be<br />

decided on its merits. If such development is confined around existing towns or settlements, hopefuly the majority <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Countryside will remain.<br />

Will my views be listened to. Will local government just move to follow the path the government takes for the future <strong>of</strong><br />

planning, housing etc. Is this just an exercise that has to be seen to be done. So we are now going to live in a town in the<br />

county. I suppose you will carry on regardless <strong>of</strong> what the community think.<br />

A common sense co-ordinated approach to national regional and local planning is welcome and long overdue. Other public<br />

services must be included in development framework with a degree <strong>of</strong> local control. A pro-active approach is needed to<br />

transport/infrastructure before housing or other development.<br />

088 Miss S Thackeray<br />

Having lived in Rayleigh for over 20 years I feel I am in a position to comment on this area. I don't feel I can make<br />

<strong>comments</strong> on other areas as I do not have the knowledge living somewhere gives you. Local development frameworks -<br />

developers should be told they can only build luxury big houses if they are building the equivalent affordable housing for our<br />

young and old or we will be living with our parents and our children in these big houses althogether for ever - not a prospect<br />

I would look forward to and nor would they!<br />

089 J Weddell Try and clear drains<br />

In our area a transfer waste station has been operating for some years without a problem. Since August new equipment has<br />

been inst<strong>all</strong>ed the noise from this is causing the quality <strong>of</strong> life for the residents to be unbearable. Windows cannot be<br />

090 Mr B Everett<br />

opened because <strong>of</strong> the noise. I hope the planning department can look into this.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!