Planning - Summary of all comments - Amazon Web Services

More documents

Recommendations

Info

129 Mr A Clarke 134 Ms Innes 135 Mr C Blundell 136 Mrs G E Chase 137 Mr & Mrs Acres 138 The Occupier 141 Mr & Mrs Sarchet 142 D Tilley/R Bhandari 143 J E Burfield Transport provision with up to 9000 additional vehicles the B1013 would most likely suffer acute traffic chaos at certain times during every 24 hours unless measures are introduced to restrict car use. How acceptable would such necessary action be received. Whilst increased bus facilities - additional stops and routes - would be a very sensible approach, unfortunately would be poorly supported and therefore not cost effective. Similarly additional rail services - stations and lines - would not be viable due to costs and operational problems as shown: Increased journey times. No available slots on joining the mainline at Shenfield. Lack of track availability due to the bottleneck between Bethnal Green and Liverpool Street. Much more costly rolling stock would be required which would be idle outisde the morning and evening peaks in consequence would not be earning much needed revenue. As fpr airport expansion....as far as I am concerned that is a fefinate NO NO. In conclusion who is going to pay for this inflationary developemtn....certainly not the rich and powerful Keep a very tight control of so called travellers who park, without permission, on any ground and who, when eventually moved on leave the land in a disgusting state. More patrol police officers. Tighter traffic parking controls. The welfare of the community - ie increasing nos of population using the facilities of doctors/schools/A.E. Hospital facilities. These facilities were established many years ago again as applied to our roads. We do not see any adjustment to these facilities, allowing for the increase in no.s of residents etc. Found "Rochford District Matters" very interesting. Please remember every time more housing is built, schools, doctors and travelling facilities are needed. Why keep building retirement homes, just trying to bundle us oldies into square boxes into what look like "leper colonies" just isn't on. Build places for the youngsters, their need is greater. I think you made a mistake in making Websters Way 2-way traffic. Traffic was far less congested when we had 1-way traffic. Now we have traffic queing all the way along Websters Way. It must be very annoying, especially for the bus drivers. We would also like to have a swimming pool in Rayleigh. Not everyone has a car to get to Clements Hall. Perhaps you could arrange transport? Public transport should be robust enough to cope with needs to get young people into work. This village is served by 1 bus an hour after 8pm but trains are arriving every 20 minutes at Rayleigh Station. Why not revert to the smaller buses for evenings? We would like to see vast improvements in the recycling initivatives - for example - the collection of all cardboard and recyclable plastics. We have grave concerns that the whole of the area will become over-developed. New housing and facilities obviously draws in more people leading to a cycle of perpetual growth and urban sprawl. The airport should be supported as a transport facility and area of high tech industry. We do not want to see this valuble resource turn into a shopping estate/housing development, adding to the strain on the infrastructure locally. Housing - If my memory serves me right, there was such a plan to built a whole estate, covering all the land between the A129 and Rawreth Lane. Would you upgrade wither of these roads. They should be upgraded now before more houses are built. But that would be out of character.
144 Mr C Bambury 145 Mr A Lysons 146 A C Barton As you will be aware, the Agency's interest relates to the motorway and all purpose trunk road network that it manages on the Secretary of State's behalf. In the case of Rochford there are no trunk roads within the District although there are two strategic corridors namely the A13 and A127/A1159 which connect into the M25 motorway network at Junctions 30 and 29 respectively. Sections of these roads in the Thurrock and Brentwood borough areas are currently heavily congested, particularly during peak periods, and operate under considerable levels of network stress. Therefore it is important to the Agency that the impact of major development proposals in the Rochford area is considered in the context of future impact on the M25 and the A13 Trunk Road. In spatial planning and development control terms the HA has a duty to safeguard the operation of the motorway and trunk road network as laid down in the DTLR circular 04/2001 (Control of Development Affecting Trunk Road and Agreements with Developers under Section 278 of the Highways Act 1980). I realise that you have provided a questionnaire that invites responses to the above document. However, I am sure you will appreciate that it There is no shortage of houses in the UK, it just London sponges up all the wealth. STOP EXPANDING LONDON!! Spread jobs and housing around the country instead of cramming everyone down here, it's stupid. STOP BLOCKING ROADS WITH BOLLARDS AND SPEED HUMP!! You block the roads, then wonder why there is conjestion - cretins! When you build a road make it have twice the capacity you need now. Hurry up and bulldoze 'Camp Bling' - twice for good measure. Don't leave anywhere/provide anywhere for gypsies if you don't pay you don't get. Why build flats? who wants to live in a flat? If you have a full time job why should you move to live in a part time house? Houses, need car parking and garages, need to be big enough to get a car in and get out of said car. Houses need space for atleast 2 cars on the drive. The roads are much better with your litter collections, congrats to the cleaners. Provision of more seating although Rayleigh is generous. Has the bench where the top of London Hill been put back? Penalties for graffiti, cameras as evidence. Greater cooperation on siting of signs and lighting. Encourage cooperation for rooms in the roof or adjacent properties for better visual effect and no flat roof above the original roof apex. Cameras used to monitor blue badge parking conformance. Help motorists, paint ends of Websters Way kerbs. Install mirror at rail bridge to enable London Hill traffic to turn right, given London Road traffic able to see and give way. 147 Mr I Randall I have serious concerns regarding any increase housing within our district. I use our roads regularly throughout the day and am appalled by the conjection that has increased over the years. I am not an expert on these matters and have no positive solutions but more houses, more cars, more conjestion! Are you really going to listen to the views of your residents or have decisions already been taken? I think the latter!! Please, please oppose government requirements with gusto! Who are the brilliant minds in the planning department who decided to sell the playing fields to McCarthy & Stone to erect 62 flats? Depriving the school opposite of their last remaining green area, and why, with all the conjection and pollution to which these children are subjected, has not servious consideration been given to moving the school to Rocheway, an excellent area, tailor made. I appreciate that the Rocheway site is near the airport, but come now Rochford Council, these children stand more chance of suffering from the effects of pollution than the chance of an aircraft accident and the possibility of Southend Airport being developed into anything more than its present form is still as remote as it was when I 148 L F Wallace first moved into the area 37 years ago. 149 Cunningham I think speed ramp should be sited in and around side roads in Ashingdon
Page 1 and 2: ROCHFORD DISTRICT LOCAL DEVELOPMENT
Page 3 and 4: Rep No Contact Name General comment
Page 5 and 6: 024 Mr P Williams 025 Mrs P Clifton
Page 7 and 8: 050 Mrs J Samuels 051 Mrs D Langdon
Page 9 and 10: 069 Mrs B Buckland 070 P Robertson
Page 11 and 12: 091 Ms P Bailey 092 Mrs M Hills 095
Page 13: 121 Mrs S J Attfield 122 F E Wells
Page 17 and 18: 159 Mr & Mrs J Collins I do not hav
Page 19 and 20: 177 Mr J East 178 Mr D Livermore 17
Page 21 and 22: 198 Mr J Clamp 200 Mr T O'Shea 201
Page 23 and 24: 222 R Luck 225 Mr P Court 227 Mr &
Page 25 and 26: 246 Miss M Saward 248 Mr A Presslee
Page 27 and 28: 259 Mr M B Rogers 260 Mr & Mrs Will
Page 29 and 30: 272 Mr A Patton 273 Mr J Wilson 274
Page 31 and 32: 300 Mrs Upson I have answered this
Page 33 and 34: 322 Ms J Hitchcock 323 Mr T Beebee
Page 35 and 36: 338 Mr & Mrs Saunders We have been
Page 37 and 38: 357 Ms V O'Malley Perhaps the gover
Page 39 and 40: 1. HOUSING Where should land be rel
Page 41 and 42: 014 D Hanrahan I do not agree furth
Page 43 and 44: 040 Mr D Huskisson The Ashingdon Ro
Page 45 and 46: 070 P Robertson Rayleigh and the su
Page 47 and 48: 102 Mr T Newton Firstly why are you
Page 49 and 50: 130 Mrs S Martin 131 Mel Bennett 13
Page 51 and 52: 160 Ms S Barnes No green belt shoul
Page 53 and 54: 189 Mr G Gooding 190 Mr G J Tinsey
Page 55 and 56: 215 Mr T R Thompson 216 Mr & Mrs D
Page 57 and 58: 237 Mr Sanders We should not be rel
Page 59 and 60: 263 Mr P Kneen 264 Mr K Coleman 265
Page 61 and 62: 286 Mr L F Knight No more housing w
Page 63 and 64: 319 Mr M Lang Not down in this corn
Page 65 and 66:
355 Mr K Vingoe 356 Mr & Mrs D Dobb
Page 67 and 68:
2. AFFORDABLE HOUSING Have we got t
Page 69 and 70:
Mr R Huckett & Ms C Mobbs Affordabl
Page 71 and 72:
065 Mr T Bennett Affordable (truly
Page 73 and 74:
104 B Aspinall In my opinion the cu
Page 75 and 76:
145 Mr A Lysons There is no wy I ca
Page 77 and 78:
180 Mr R Swain Local jobs are usual
Page 79 and 80:
213 Mr M Wheeler 215 Mr T R Thompso
Page 81 and 82:
251 Mr B Guyett - Chairman We agree
Page 83 and 84:
287 Mr R Forster Cannot comment as
Page 85 and 86:
327 Mrs C Taylor 329 Mrs M J Snowdo
Page 87 and 88:
3. JOBS Where can we find land for
Page 89 and 90:
021 Mr P Jermyn There is enough spa
Page 91 and 92:
063 Mr B A Stammers Broardband mean
Page 93 and 94:
113 Mr & Mrs Rowland Apprentaships
Page 95 and 96:
158 Mr & Mrs White 159 Mr & Mrs J C
Page 97 and 98:
193 Ms S Swift Should be on sites v
Page 99 and 100:
236 Mr & Mrs Beattie Transport link
Page 101 and 102:
274 Mr S Mckinnon Employment where
Page 103 and 104:
321 R J Feather How will the jobs b
Page 105 and 106:
4. PROTECTION Are there any other a
Page 107 and 108:
026 Mr A Lantaff As stated earlier
Page 109 and 110:
073 Mr S Learmouth I believe strong
Page 111 and 112:
136 Mrs G E Chase Protect our areas
Page 113 and 114:
178 Mr D Livermore Protect all of t
Page 115 and 116:
228 Ms A Henderson I think the coun
Page 117 and 118:
261 S A Skinner 262 Ms L Parish I w
Page 119 and 120:
301 Ms K Kelly 4.3 Protection and e
Page 121 and 122:
354 Mrs Smith This side of the rive
Page 123 and 124:
Rep No Contact Name Character Comme
Page 125 and 126:
052 Mr & Mrs D Lench Too many expen
Page 127 and 128:
106 Ms P Melito Rochford should alw
Page 129 and 130:
166 G W Fleming All aeras must be m
Page 131 and 132:
204 Mr R Gould As before 205 Mrs Wh
Page 133 and 134:
251 Mr B Guyett - Chairman No, you
Page 135 and 136:
301 Ms K Kelly 4.9 Good design and
Page 137 and 138:
359 Mr New The district is short of
Page 139 and 140:
Rep No Contact Name Energy & Water
Page 141 and 142:
046 Mr & Mrs J Cripps See 1.0 - why
Page 143 and 144:
093 Mrs M J Owoo I think you are do
Page 145 and 146:
140 Mrs J Davies If you are referin
Page 147 and 148:
181 Mrs M R Hutchings What do you m
Page 149 and 150:
224 Mr K S Gee Water - there are se
Page 151 and 152:
263 Mr P Kneen Whilst Swan Hill ack
Page 153 and 154:
307 Mr J Snow Extra development mea
Page 155 and 156:
7. LEISURE, TOURISM & COMMUNITY FAC
Page 157 and 158:
027 Mr B Fuller Leisure facilities
Page 159 and 160:
069 Mrs B Buckland 070 P Robertson
Page 161 and 162:
112 A J Smythe Green Burial sites -
Page 163 and 164:
156 J W Collins Rochford does not n
Page 165 and 166:
190 Mr G J Tinsey New facilities sh
Page 167 and 168:
235 L W Lewis There are not enough
Page 169 and 170:
268 Mr S Crussell We don't really h
Page 171 and 172:
317 Mr D Harris Having attended a '
Page 173 and 174:
359 Mr New I do not see this as a t
Page 175 and 176:
Rep No Contact Name CPO and Plannin
Page 177 and 178:
057 Mrs J Williams Developers shoul
Page 179 and 180:
102 Mr T Newton Compulsory purchase
Page 181 and 182:
158 Mr & Mrs White Some compulsory
Page 183 and 184:
196 Mr A E Hodges The voluntary app
Page 185 and 186:
246 Miss M Saward No this is not fa
Page 187 and 188:
306 Mr E C Cook See comments under
Page 189 and 190:
362 Ms M Power Circular 1/97 provid
show all

Planning - Summary of all comments - Amazon Web Services

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?