24.07.2013 Views

Planning - Summary of all comments - Amazon Web Services

Planning - Summary of all comments - Amazon Web Services

Planning - Summary of all comments - Amazon Web Services

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

324 Mrs Doward<br />

In the corner <strong>of</strong> Hawkwell where I live, we have a wonderful little haven for wildlife, which not many people know exists. In<br />

Rectory Road, it starts at Thorpe Road, where I live - a muddy unmade lane ?? Scub land, reaching the to the bottom end -<br />

nothing to ? this scrub land reaches across to the Main Road on the left hand side and on the right across as far as the<br />

Christmas Tree Farm and the road to Clements H<strong>all</strong>, and backs on to Spencers Park the whole area, containing fields, scrub<br />

and woodland ? important to the local wildlife as it is a barrier from the busy roads and gives them a safe place to hide in<br />

during the day. We have visits in our gardens from badgers and foxes, and squirrels galore and even ? ? deer ? the area.<br />

The badgers and foxes criss cross the lane using both sides <strong>of</strong> the scrubland in complete safety. Horse riders use the road<br />

to get away from the main roads and to gain access to the bridle way in Spencers Park, dog walkers, cyclists and children<br />

<strong>all</strong> use the road safely to reach either Spencers or Clements H<strong>all</strong> and can continue down the footpath to Windsor Gardens<br />

325 Mr D Elwell All non developed areas should be retained and <strong>comments</strong> in 4 agreed.<br />

Council should be seeking to protect <strong>all</strong> areas! Preservation <strong>of</strong> lower/upper roach v<strong>all</strong>ey vital - supports much wildlife.<br />

Increasing recreational opportunities can be good but depends on the nature <strong>of</strong> the opportunities (car parking? Disturbance<br />

326 Owner/Occupier to wildlife?).<br />

We need to protect more <strong>of</strong> our old oak trees etc, whether in woodland or not. They are more pleasing to the eye and<br />

provide habitat for our birds and wildlife - the same for hedgerows. Yes, the Upper Roach V<strong>all</strong>ey is a good area for<br />

recreational opportunities. I would like to see a better network <strong>of</strong> public bridleways across the Rochford District. Cycle<br />

lanes would also be a good outdoor pursuit keeping fit etc. Encourage the councils to provide more open spaces for <strong>all</strong><br />

327 Mrs C Taylor<br />

users. Cycle ramps and skate board parks provide outdoor facilities for our youth, to get them outdoors too!<br />

Every attempt should be made to protect our green spaces. This area is rapidly becoming a concrete jungle. Certainly no-<br />

329 Mrs M J Snowdon one should even consider ? Any more ancient woodland.<br />

Steps could be taken to prevent the spread <strong>of</strong> the mixture <strong>of</strong> rural/urban landscape where farms etc are taken over and<br />

used to store <strong>all</strong> sorts <strong>of</strong> redundant equipment, containers etc. Rural businesses such as garden centres should not be<br />

330 P Mansbridge<br />

<strong>all</strong>owed to over-develop.<br />

331 Mr A C Cooper Should protect the riverside areas <strong>of</strong> Crouch.<br />

An area used for recreational purposes is not an ideal wildlife 'flora and fauna' habitat so areas <strong>of</strong> seclusion from the general<br />

332 Mr & Mrs Jones public are necessary.<br />

Yes, increase recreational opportunities but not in a way that presents 'a blot on the landscape' eg a large complex <strong>of</strong><br />

buildings. Most important to retain gaps between settlements otherwise we will have just one large sprawling community<br />

333 Mr & Mrs Hopkins that loses its identity.<br />

I thought green belt was protected, obviously from No. 1 about housing is it re<strong>all</strong>y protected? You have done a marvellous<br />

job <strong>of</strong> creating new parks in the last few years and you are to be congratulated. As residents <strong>of</strong> this area we are natur<strong>all</strong>y<br />

334 Mrs Amey<br />

against big developments and the balance appears about right.<br />

I feel RDC has a good approach to protection and need to keep its focus on extending areas eg Crouch V<strong>all</strong>ey. Recreation<br />

347 Mr C Rooke<br />

opportunities must be considered with ? Area - no marine growth ? Gold courses - expand country park type ?<br />

If we let the gaps between settlements and the green belt go we'll never get it back. We have to think <strong>of</strong> future generations.<br />

Already Rawreth is in danger <strong>of</strong> being sw<strong>all</strong>owed by Wickford from one side and Rayleigh from the other, and Rayleigh is<br />

349 Ms C Paine<br />

merging into Southend.<br />

350 Mr A James I believe on the whole the council is moving in the right direction on this subject.<br />

Would agree that we need to protect the green belt between settlements. Not sure that the Upper Roach V<strong>all</strong>ey is suitable<br />

352 Cllr Joyce Smith for increased recreation as most <strong>of</strong> it is farmland, poor public transport, lack <strong>of</strong> facilities that would be needed.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!