Planning - Summary of all comments - Amazon Web Services
Planning - Summary of all comments - Amazon Web Services
Planning - Summary of all comments - Amazon Web Services
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
324 Mrs Doward<br />
In the corner <strong>of</strong> Hawkwell where I live, we have a wonderful little haven for wildlife, which not many people know exists. In<br />
Rectory Road, it starts at Thorpe Road, where I live - a muddy unmade lane ?? Scub land, reaching the to the bottom end -<br />
nothing to ? this scrub land reaches across to the Main Road on the left hand side and on the right across as far as the<br />
Christmas Tree Farm and the road to Clements H<strong>all</strong>, and backs on to Spencers Park the whole area, containing fields, scrub<br />
and woodland ? important to the local wildlife as it is a barrier from the busy roads and gives them a safe place to hide in<br />
during the day. We have visits in our gardens from badgers and foxes, and squirrels galore and even ? ? deer ? the area.<br />
The badgers and foxes criss cross the lane using both sides <strong>of</strong> the scrubland in complete safety. Horse riders use the road<br />
to get away from the main roads and to gain access to the bridle way in Spencers Park, dog walkers, cyclists and children<br />
<strong>all</strong> use the road safely to reach either Spencers or Clements H<strong>all</strong> and can continue down the footpath to Windsor Gardens<br />
325 Mr D Elwell All non developed areas should be retained and <strong>comments</strong> in 4 agreed.<br />
Council should be seeking to protect <strong>all</strong> areas! Preservation <strong>of</strong> lower/upper roach v<strong>all</strong>ey vital - supports much wildlife.<br />
Increasing recreational opportunities can be good but depends on the nature <strong>of</strong> the opportunities (car parking? Disturbance<br />
326 Owner/Occupier to wildlife?).<br />
We need to protect more <strong>of</strong> our old oak trees etc, whether in woodland or not. They are more pleasing to the eye and<br />
provide habitat for our birds and wildlife - the same for hedgerows. Yes, the Upper Roach V<strong>all</strong>ey is a good area for<br />
recreational opportunities. I would like to see a better network <strong>of</strong> public bridleways across the Rochford District. Cycle<br />
lanes would also be a good outdoor pursuit keeping fit etc. Encourage the councils to provide more open spaces for <strong>all</strong><br />
327 Mrs C Taylor<br />
users. Cycle ramps and skate board parks provide outdoor facilities for our youth, to get them outdoors too!<br />
Every attempt should be made to protect our green spaces. This area is rapidly becoming a concrete jungle. Certainly no-<br />
329 Mrs M J Snowdon one should even consider ? Any more ancient woodland.<br />
Steps could be taken to prevent the spread <strong>of</strong> the mixture <strong>of</strong> rural/urban landscape where farms etc are taken over and<br />
used to store <strong>all</strong> sorts <strong>of</strong> redundant equipment, containers etc. Rural businesses such as garden centres should not be<br />
330 P Mansbridge<br />
<strong>all</strong>owed to over-develop.<br />
331 Mr A C Cooper Should protect the riverside areas <strong>of</strong> Crouch.<br />
An area used for recreational purposes is not an ideal wildlife 'flora and fauna' habitat so areas <strong>of</strong> seclusion from the general<br />
332 Mr & Mrs Jones public are necessary.<br />
Yes, increase recreational opportunities but not in a way that presents 'a blot on the landscape' eg a large complex <strong>of</strong><br />
buildings. Most important to retain gaps between settlements otherwise we will have just one large sprawling community<br />
333 Mr & Mrs Hopkins that loses its identity.<br />
I thought green belt was protected, obviously from No. 1 about housing is it re<strong>all</strong>y protected? You have done a marvellous<br />
job <strong>of</strong> creating new parks in the last few years and you are to be congratulated. As residents <strong>of</strong> this area we are natur<strong>all</strong>y<br />
334 Mrs Amey<br />
against big developments and the balance appears about right.<br />
I feel RDC has a good approach to protection and need to keep its focus on extending areas eg Crouch V<strong>all</strong>ey. Recreation<br />
347 Mr C Rooke<br />
opportunities must be considered with ? Area - no marine growth ? Gold courses - expand country park type ?<br />
If we let the gaps between settlements and the green belt go we'll never get it back. We have to think <strong>of</strong> future generations.<br />
Already Rawreth is in danger <strong>of</strong> being sw<strong>all</strong>owed by Wickford from one side and Rayleigh from the other, and Rayleigh is<br />
349 Ms C Paine<br />
merging into Southend.<br />
350 Mr A James I believe on the whole the council is moving in the right direction on this subject.<br />
Would agree that we need to protect the green belt between settlements. Not sure that the Upper Roach V<strong>all</strong>ey is suitable<br />
352 Cllr Joyce Smith for increased recreation as most <strong>of</strong> it is farmland, poor public transport, lack <strong>of</strong> facilities that would be needed.