Planning - Summary of all comments - Amazon Web Services

More documents

Recommendations

Info

160 Ms S Barnes There should be more protected areas. All woodlands and rural open areas are what makes this area a pleasant place to live. 161 Mr S J Benee Yes What sort of recreational opportunities? I think the balance is about right at present but what development opportunities are 162 Mr & Mrs Livens we talking about. 163 Mr S T Cardwell Any green belt and areas of special importance have to be protected at all costs. 164 Mr I King Yes. No, you have not got it right. Why constant concern re recreation? Why not leave some land for wild-life, just leave some 165 Mr G Searles land alone, why can't you? 166 G W Fleming Any rec areas are good providing they are planned to blend into surrounding area grounds are maintained Recreational opportunities should be increase, especially for the youth of the area, who need easily accessible cheap recreation. With regard to the right balance between protection and development opportunities, due to the over 168 Ms L Young development of the area already, any further development would have to be the development of protection. 169 Mr & Mrs Garlick 170 Mr & Mrs Gibson 171 Ms K Meiklejohn 173 Mr & Mrs Cripps 174 Mr P Clark Green belt is very important but so is the ability for people to move around within the District and into other Districts. This is very important for workers and businesses. A bypass for the District from Southend to Chelmsford/London is badly needed if it could be done without any (or very little) accompanying building along th route. Some connections to this road would be necessary. Perhaps recreational areas - golf, lakes, tennis courts, ice-rink etc could be established along the route. ? Plans for the development of the Thames Gateway Rochford should remain the "green space/lungs" for Southend and South East Essex. This means pressuring the Country park and coastal recreational areas. This would allow expansion of the area for activity breaks - walking, horse riding, golf, water sports (including fishing) to complement the nightlife of Southend. The green belt should be protected where ever possible. Any unused land can be utilised for allotments - especially allocate these to schools. The coastline is one asset which is to be valued see 7. Depends what is ment by recreational opportunities. Large recreational stadium would be wrong in the Roach Valley. Country pursuits such as equestrian events, treking etc, boating on the Roach, moorings at Stambridge could be encouraged. Tranquility in a balance however, to much country tourism and it is soon destroyed. The Roach Valley must be protected. Areas such as Hockley Woods, Cherry Orchard and Magnolia Nature reserves should be protected and expanded. Magnolia reserve could be expanded northwards and off road cycle tracks could link this area through Magnolia Road, Clements Hall, Cherry Orchard and Hockley Woods. This would create a brilliant recreational facility. Coastline should be protected and nature reserves established in coordination with Essex Wildlife Trust and RSPB. 175 Mr H J Rowland If you concentrate recreational opportunities in one area, you either have traffic and parking problems or the facilities are under used because they are too far from potential customers. We need lots of areas spread around the district. 176 Mr R Abbott The council should protect all our green belt, especially between viallages. Upper Roach Valley, on the map, look a good place to develop for recreation. Rayleigh has no large open public space. The area between the A127 and the railway from Great Wheatley Road to the old A130 seems a possibility. The 177 Mr J East development around Kingsley Wood has been, in my view encroached upon without public knowledge.
178 Mr D Livermore Protect all of the existing open spaces. Make more areas available for parks and jost open areas for kids and families to breath in. Development opportunities is just management speak for concreting the south east. The balance is not right you have already gone too far. Stop now and consider how to repair the damage caused by years of building programmes. The Roach Valley ok for recreation - but we do not need more houses on protected land (neither the roads, hospitals or 179 Mrs F M Wilson schools can cope with more people! The council should be looking to protect as much green space as possible - and if possible adding to it, ie adding new woods etc. It can only do this if it increases the density of living accommodation and occupation of space by industry and 180 Mr R Swain commerce and that must mean building up and banning the one-storey shed. 181 Mrs M R Hutchings I've no idea! The council is trying hard, the history of the mentioned areas needs to be exploited to the locals. Not many children know 182 Mrs V Wisbey how ancient Ashingdon is. 183 Tomassi More protection required. Do not create areas that draw in a lot of people from outside the area. This would only add to congestion and pollution. 184 Mr T L Ellis Better to have a situation where local people can enjoy the peace and tranquility of quiet areas and passtimes. The whole of the Roach Valley should be protected at all costs! I believe recreational opportunities are satisfactory, but 185 Mr J K Mills further provision could be made in Rayleigh West (London Road/Rawreth Lane area). Our current areas such as Cherry Orchard Jubilee Park should be protected and extended. Areas should be developed which would encourage birds to nest, migrate to/from etc. Ancient woodlands must not be encroached upon, thus protecting 187 Mrs K Jesty wildlife and plants. Yes, the council, as the resident's elected voice should be seeking to protect all the greenery they can because, mark my words if you keep developing our area will become a ghetto of industry and housing, with the odd acre or two of rather nice 188 Mr A Mackay country park that we may be able to visit probably subject to an entry fee. 189 Mr G Gooding The council should seek to improve its existing areas. 190 Mr G J Tinsey Would be on a case by case basis. Protect all woodland areas, especially Hockley, an ancient historical site and new jubilee park, keep some green areas in all 191 Janice & Alex Brining areas. 192 Ms B Mean I am not informed enough to answer. We could do with another swimming pool for Rayleigh. Some people find it difficult to travel to Hawkwell. The Leisure Centre was a greatly missed opportunity to provide this facility, especially for children living so close to the sea, it is 193 Ms S Swift important that they learn to swim at an early age. 194 Mr C Hutchinson No further green belt encroachment should be made. 195 Mr B M Gilbert What do you actually mean by development? Development of recreational sites or housing/commercial development? Protect all existing woodland areas. The open spaces between Hockley/Eastwood and Hawkwell/Rochford need to be 196 Mr A E Hodges protected to avoid blanket development. Sorry, haven't lived here long enough to know this. I did read an article in one of the free papers that Grade II listed's have 197 P McAllister gone and flats have been planned that’s only good for developers not for protected buildings. Keeping greenbelt open. Between the areas mention in your intro and indeed no further encroachment between 198 Mr J Clamp Wickford/Rayleigh Hullbridge/Battlesbridge/Wickford.
Page 1 and 2:
ROCHFORD DISTRICT LOCAL DEVELOPMENT
Page 3 and 4:
Rep No Contact Name General comment
Page 5 and 6:
024 Mr P Williams 025 Mrs P Clifton
Page 7 and 8:
050 Mrs J Samuels 051 Mrs D Langdon
Page 9 and 10:
069 Mrs B Buckland 070 P Robertson
Page 11 and 12:
091 Ms P Bailey 092 Mrs M Hills 095
Page 13 and 14:
121 Mrs S J Attfield 122 F E Wells
Page 15 and 16:
144 Mr C Bambury 145 Mr A Lysons 14
Page 17 and 18:
159 Mr & Mrs J Collins I do not hav
Page 19 and 20:
177 Mr J East 178 Mr D Livermore 17
Page 21 and 22:
198 Mr J Clamp 200 Mr T O'Shea 201
Page 23 and 24:
222 R Luck 225 Mr P Court 227 Mr &
Page 25 and 26:
246 Miss M Saward 248 Mr A Presslee
Page 27 and 28:
259 Mr M B Rogers 260 Mr & Mrs Will
Page 29 and 30:
272 Mr A Patton 273 Mr J Wilson 274
Page 31 and 32:
300 Mrs Upson I have answered this
Page 33 and 34:
322 Ms J Hitchcock 323 Mr T Beebee
Page 35 and 36:
338 Mr & Mrs Saunders We have been
Page 37 and 38:
357 Ms V O'Malley Perhaps the gover
Page 39 and 40:
1. HOUSING Where should land be rel
Page 41 and 42:
014 D Hanrahan I do not agree furth
Page 43 and 44:
040 Mr D Huskisson The Ashingdon Ro
Page 45 and 46:
070 P Robertson Rayleigh and the su
Page 47 and 48:
102 Mr T Newton Firstly why are you
Page 49 and 50:
130 Mrs S Martin 131 Mel Bennett 13
Page 51 and 52:
160 Ms S Barnes No green belt shoul
Page 53 and 54:
189 Mr G Gooding 190 Mr G J Tinsey
Page 55 and 56:
215 Mr T R Thompson 216 Mr & Mrs D
Page 57 and 58:
237 Mr Sanders We should not be rel
Page 59 and 60:
263 Mr P Kneen 264 Mr K Coleman 265
Page 61 and 62: 286 Mr L F Knight No more housing w
Page 63 and 64: 319 Mr M Lang Not down in this corn
Page 65 and 66: 355 Mr K Vingoe 356 Mr & Mrs D Dobb
Page 67 and 68: 2. AFFORDABLE HOUSING Have we got t
Page 69 and 70: Mr R Huckett & Ms C Mobbs Affordabl
Page 71 and 72: 065 Mr T Bennett Affordable (truly
Page 73 and 74: 104 B Aspinall In my opinion the cu
Page 75 and 76: 145 Mr A Lysons There is no wy I ca
Page 77 and 78: 180 Mr R Swain Local jobs are usual
Page 79 and 80: 213 Mr M Wheeler 215 Mr T R Thompso
Page 81 and 82: 251 Mr B Guyett - Chairman We agree
Page 83 and 84: 287 Mr R Forster Cannot comment as
Page 85 and 86: 327 Mrs C Taylor 329 Mrs M J Snowdo
Page 87 and 88: 3. JOBS Where can we find land for
Page 89 and 90: 021 Mr P Jermyn There is enough spa
Page 91 and 92: 063 Mr B A Stammers Broardband mean
Page 93 and 94: 113 Mr & Mrs Rowland Apprentaships
Page 95 and 96: 158 Mr & Mrs White 159 Mr & Mrs J C
Page 97 and 98: 193 Ms S Swift Should be on sites v
Page 99 and 100: 236 Mr & Mrs Beattie Transport link
Page 101 and 102: 274 Mr S Mckinnon Employment where
Page 103 and 104: 321 R J Feather How will the jobs b
Page 105 and 106: 4. PROTECTION Are there any other a
Page 107 and 108: 026 Mr A Lantaff As stated earlier
Page 109 and 110: 073 Mr S Learmouth I believe strong
Page 111: 136 Mrs G E Chase Protect our areas
Page 115 and 116: 228 Ms A Henderson I think the coun
Page 117 and 118: 261 S A Skinner 262 Ms L Parish I w
Page 119 and 120: 301 Ms K Kelly 4.3 Protection and e
Page 121 and 122: 354 Mrs Smith This side of the rive
Page 123 and 124: Rep No Contact Name Character Comme
Page 125 and 126: 052 Mr & Mrs D Lench Too many expen
Page 127 and 128: 106 Ms P Melito Rochford should alw
Page 129 and 130: 166 G W Fleming All aeras must be m
Page 131 and 132: 204 Mr R Gould As before 205 Mrs Wh
Page 133 and 134: 251 Mr B Guyett - Chairman No, you
Page 135 and 136: 301 Ms K Kelly 4.9 Good design and
Page 137 and 138: 359 Mr New The district is short of
Page 139 and 140: Rep No Contact Name Energy & Water
Page 141 and 142: 046 Mr & Mrs J Cripps See 1.0 - why
Page 143 and 144: 093 Mrs M J Owoo I think you are do
Page 145 and 146: 140 Mrs J Davies If you are referin
Page 147 and 148: 181 Mrs M R Hutchings What do you m
Page 149 and 150: 224 Mr K S Gee Water - there are se
Page 151 and 152: 263 Mr P Kneen Whilst Swan Hill ack
Page 153 and 154: 307 Mr J Snow Extra development mea
Page 155 and 156: 7. LEISURE, TOURISM & COMMUNITY FAC
Page 157 and 158: 027 Mr B Fuller Leisure facilities
Page 159 and 160: 069 Mrs B Buckland 070 P Robertson
Page 161 and 162: 112 A J Smythe Green Burial sites -
Page 163 and 164:
156 J W Collins Rochford does not n
Page 165 and 166:
190 Mr G J Tinsey New facilities sh
Page 167 and 168:
235 L W Lewis There are not enough
Page 169 and 170:
268 Mr S Crussell We don't really h
Page 171 and 172:
317 Mr D Harris Having attended a '
Page 173 and 174:
359 Mr New I do not see this as a t
Page 175 and 176:
Rep No Contact Name CPO and Plannin
Page 177 and 178:
057 Mrs J Williams Developers shoul
Page 179 and 180:
102 Mr T Newton Compulsory purchase
Page 181 and 182:
158 Mr & Mrs White Some compulsory
Page 183 and 184:
196 Mr A E Hodges The voluntary app
Page 185 and 186:
246 Miss M Saward No this is not fa
Page 187 and 188:
306 Mr E C Cook See comments under
Page 189 and 190:
362 Ms M Power Circular 1/97 provid
show all

Planning - Summary of all comments - Amazon Web Services

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?