Planning - Summary of all comments - Amazon Web Services

073 Mr S Learmouth I believe strongly that Green Belt should be protected. There needs to be youth focused recreational facilities in Rayleigh.
074 Mr & Mrs Raddon Yes. Our open country, fields, marsh, parks and woods our wild life.
075 Mr K A Cooke All Green Belts should be protected at any cost.
076 Ms G Lunn
All the Roach valley area should be protected and the release of our countryside should be restricted as much as is
possible.
077 Cllr Glen Dryhurst
The countryside, agricultural land, pastures, riding stables, woods, hedges and trees should be protected. The ECC and
farmers should be asked to limite the savaging of hedgerows and to leave saplings to grow and cut hedges either side. The
Roach Valley should be nurtured and protected. The balance will be right providing development is not too much, too soon.
078 David & Jeanne Yes protect the green belt. Yes. Not quite.
Rawreth Lane is fast losing its beauty and identity and should be saved. The area at Gusted Hall Lane leaking to Hockley
Woods is well used and should be conserved. You have been doing good work developing Cherry Orchard Lane and
079 Mrs S Clark
Wallasea Island. There are some delightful small woods in Hockley/Rayleigh/Hullbridge which need protection.
080 Mr C Hathaway Magnolia Park, Spencer Park and the Green Belt between Ashingdon and Hockley should all be protected
081 T S Papworth Protect the children's areas from heavy traffic please.
082 Mr J Adkin All green areas should be a priority for the council to protect.
084 Miss M Andrews Please can we protect grass verges on the Holt Farm Estate in Hawkwell.
085 C G Tabar More recreational sites can be allocated in suitable areas, such as Upper Roach area/the new country park
All green belt and places of history, beauty and culture must be kept. Our culture is being eroded, this country must keep
086 Mr M Gorman
those.
Protection and developing access should go hand in hand. Improving access, awareness and protection to areas and
087 Mr I Walker
features close to settlements is more important than Upper Roach Valley.
088 Miss S Thackeray I cannot speak for areas that I'm not familiar with or any historical knowledge of.
090 Mr B Everett I agree
091 Ms P Bailey I believe that the council should fight tooth and nail to retain our open spaces and green belt and white belt.
092 Mrs M Hills Woodland, riverside and seashore sould remain undeveloped.
093 Mrs M J Owoo I do not know that area.
Yes, the Upper Roach Valley appears to be a good area for increasing recreational opportunities. I think the balance is
094 F A Browne
about right. A very important area.
095 Mr J Britton See comments
Yes we need to keep protecting what we've got and encourage species to return. Cutting hedges durnig nesting time seems
096 Mr W Roberts
to be a speciality in this area. Stop it.
Protect market square and old buildings so as to retain 'market town' image. Existing landscapes and woodlands should be
097 Mr & Mrs Newman retained and like Gusted Hall, further developed.
The woods and fields in our area should be protected so that families can enjoy the open spaces and be aware of the nature
around them. The rivers are also a place where people can find leisure pursuits and wind down after the working week.
Some green field sites have been built on to the detriment of local people. The planning laws should be stricter to stop so
099 Mr & Mrs R G Headley called travellers from building on the green belt.