Planning - Summary of all comments - Amazon Web Services

More documents

Recommendations

Info

184 Mr T L Ellis Design and landscaping are always important. Places where people live on top of each other, in drab barrack type buildings is not very satisfying and leads to aggression or depression. People need space and cheerful, well looked after surroundings. Design and appropriate landscaping are always important to maintain the character and history of the area. I support the 185 Mr J K Mills establishment of a 'local list' rural nature of the area. Rayleigh has maintained most of its original character - However there are certain shop fronts and types of shops that are 186 Mr & Mrs J Halliday gradually letting its character disappear which is quite sad. Rayleigh station looks very sad. The character of our areas is important and any new developments and/or improvements to existing buildings should be in keeping with surroundings. A local list could be of benefit to this area, as long as it is consistently adhered to. Historic 187 Mrs K Jesty properties and areas are important when keeping the character of Rochford. Well it's a bit late, Rochford square was decimated by previous councils, so forgive me if I'm not euphoric at your stance. Especially when a council favours 'moving' it's treasured buildings to where it would rather they stood eg St Lawrence Church inconveniently placed for - dare I say it - Airport expansion. A list is only as good as the people who enforce it - a 188 Mr A Mackay faceless council with no track record - we need a council we can trust. 190 Mr G J Tinsey Yes I support a local list. Design and landscaping can enhance and should enhance any area. A list to keep the right character could be valuable. In 191 Janice & Alex Brining the sixties, Hockley lost its character buildings to utility looking buildings and village green had been lost. Design and landscape are very important. If housing and landscaping are not considered then whole areas fall into a 'don't 192 Ms B Mean care' attitude and this in turn means the council eventually pays to clean up etc. 193 Ms S Swift Rayleigh lost a lot of its character in the 1960/70's. The market twon look should be protected and avoid looking like so many other towns, over supply of fast food outlets and off licences. This would cut down on nuisance behaviour because of drink. King Georges Park looks good now and the skate park has really helped keep skateboards from the High Street. 194 Mr C Hutchinson No comment Design and landscaping are very important! No matter where or what is being developed. Bad design, landscaping and lack of foresight show those responsible what they really are, when in 20/30 years time the true picture of bad forward 195 Mr B M Gilbert planning rears its ugly head. 196 Mr A E Hodges Landscaping should be applied wherever future development is agreed. In any area design and landscaping is important. A local list would be good if people had access and views, which if they 197 P McAllister had an objection they would be adhered to. The balance at the moment is about right given the increase in population. I am unsure about a local list all design and 198 Mr J Clamp landscaping should be taken as an individual decision. All areas should encompass design and landscaping or endevour to. I have been impressed with the new buildings going 200 Mr T O'Shea up in Rayleigh town I only wish this had been followed in the 50's and 60's. Rayleigh still retains its character. All areas of local concern should have necessary restraints and these should be governed by those people that use this 201 Mr M Thomas facility and area. 202 K Cardnell Yes My views are that they would not be taken into consideration look at the congestion caused by the introduction of two way traffic around Websters Way and the tailbacks this causes right back to Fitzwimarc School (despite not being approved by 203 M T Conaty the majority of residents in the area).
204 Mr R Gould As before 205 Mrs Whitham It is important to keep the landscaping correct, be it for industrial or housing. 4.10.2 says appearance of a proposal and relationship to surroundings is important to determining proposals & appeals. You remember the 'doctor's house' @ 1 Southend Road was on the Council's 'Local List' . This listed local buildings of historic, architectural or visual interest. It was informal and did not provide same protection as Grade Listing "..owners encouraged not to demolish", but were advised to apply for Grade Listing as soon as possible. Cynically, the list was omitted from revised District Plan, facilitating demolition ahead of appeal on 1 Southend Road, on grounds that, to quote head of Planning Poilcy, Government "frowned on" Local Lists (though other LPAs kept them). Grounds for refusal of 13 flats at Committee November 2004 omitted mention of the house. Head of Planning Policy commented later on objections: "Just politics, lot of local interest, nothing of character in that area". 4.10.5 - Strategy adds insult to injury: "Council dropped 207 Ms G Yeadell its Local List during preperation fo the new plan, but new guidance suggests reinstating the local list and updating the list to 208 I Gyres Increase the land per house, stop packing in as many people into small flats just to increase profit for developers. 210 Mrs M A King Landscaping is an all important feature with any building project trying to keep to original character where possible. Unable to fully reply to this question except to say that both design and types of construction ought to be sympathetic to 211 Mr B W Williams locations. I find respect for each town and villages historic character as rather much a joke as Rayleigh's prehistoric settlement history is not recognised and the most historic town is often assumed as Rochford. Design and landscaping are not important in the 212 Master J Richards built up town of Rayleigh and built up villages of Rochfrod and Hockley. Design and landscaping are important but they should not be a deterrent to development - not sure what is meant by 'a local list' but if this is a list of required features it all depends what is on the list. Planners should be there to assist not to act as a 213 Mr M Wheeler deterrent. 215 Mr T R Thompson No all areas deserve design and landscaping. Design and landscaping is always important. If design/landscaping is poor it will be undesirable to local residents. I'd say 219 Mr J Amey character is currently about right. Rayleigh is a pleasant place to live. 220 Mrs S Clarke I think character is always important. Property could be built to blend with local area. 222 R Luck I do not think it is right to say any area is unimportant. A local list is a good idea as it could be used to encourage tourism. 224 Mr K S Gee The area around Bullwood Hall and Turret House (East side of Hockley Road) must be protected (special landscape area). The requirement for Design and Access Statements should hopefully meet the Council's objective of seeking to preserve or 225 Mr P Court enhance the existing quality of the built environment. 226 Mrs A Hill I believe design and landscaping is always important - pride in whatever. 227 Mr & Mrs Haskew I like to see grass verges. I like the landscaping on Ashingdon Road off Meesons Mead. Yes - think you have got this right. Design and landscape are very important everywhere. Who enjoys looking at the plainness or brutality of the ugly flat 228 Ms A Henderson roofed blocks of flats, and factories put up in the ? 230 V G Crick Design and landscaping is important in all areas. Keeping the local character is very important, a good job has been done on the housing and refurbishment of Rochford and Rayleigh. Rochford town could be much improved by rebuilding the east end of the market square to get rid of the ugly 231 Mr & Mrs Walker buildings where the spa supermarket is.
Page 1 and 2:
ROCHFORD DISTRICT LOCAL DEVELOPMENT
Page 3 and 4:
Rep No Contact Name General comment
Page 5 and 6:
024 Mr P Williams 025 Mrs P Clifton
Page 7 and 8:
050 Mrs J Samuels 051 Mrs D Langdon
Page 9 and 10:
069 Mrs B Buckland 070 P Robertson
Page 11 and 12:
091 Ms P Bailey 092 Mrs M Hills 095
Page 13 and 14:
121 Mrs S J Attfield 122 F E Wells
Page 15 and 16:
144 Mr C Bambury 145 Mr A Lysons 14
Page 17 and 18:
159 Mr & Mrs J Collins I do not hav
Page 19 and 20:
177 Mr J East 178 Mr D Livermore 17
Page 21 and 22:
198 Mr J Clamp 200 Mr T O'Shea 201
Page 23 and 24:
222 R Luck 225 Mr P Court 227 Mr &
Page 25 and 26:
246 Miss M Saward 248 Mr A Presslee
Page 27 and 28:
259 Mr M B Rogers 260 Mr & Mrs Will
Page 29 and 30:
272 Mr A Patton 273 Mr J Wilson 274
Page 31 and 32:
300 Mrs Upson I have answered this
Page 33 and 34:
322 Ms J Hitchcock 323 Mr T Beebee
Page 35 and 36:
338 Mr & Mrs Saunders We have been
Page 37 and 38:
357 Ms V O'Malley Perhaps the gover
Page 39 and 40:
1. HOUSING Where should land be rel
Page 41 and 42:
014 D Hanrahan I do not agree furth
Page 43 and 44:
040 Mr D Huskisson The Ashingdon Ro
Page 45 and 46:
070 P Robertson Rayleigh and the su
Page 47 and 48:
102 Mr T Newton Firstly why are you
Page 49 and 50:
130 Mrs S Martin 131 Mel Bennett 13
Page 51 and 52:
160 Ms S Barnes No green belt shoul
Page 53 and 54:
189 Mr G Gooding 190 Mr G J Tinsey
Page 55 and 56:
215 Mr T R Thompson 216 Mr & Mrs D
Page 57 and 58:
237 Mr Sanders We should not be rel
Page 59 and 60:
263 Mr P Kneen 264 Mr K Coleman 265
Page 61 and 62:
286 Mr L F Knight No more housing w
Page 63 and 64:
319 Mr M Lang Not down in this corn
Page 65 and 66:
355 Mr K Vingoe 356 Mr & Mrs D Dobb
Page 67 and 68:
2. AFFORDABLE HOUSING Have we got t
Page 69 and 70:
Mr R Huckett & Ms C Mobbs Affordabl
Page 71 and 72:
065 Mr T Bennett Affordable (truly
Page 73 and 74:
104 B Aspinall In my opinion the cu
Page 75 and 76:
145 Mr A Lysons There is no wy I ca
Page 77 and 78:
180 Mr R Swain Local jobs are usual
Page 79 and 80: 213 Mr M Wheeler 215 Mr T R Thompso
Page 81 and 82: 251 Mr B Guyett - Chairman We agree
Page 83 and 84: 287 Mr R Forster Cannot comment as
Page 85 and 86: 327 Mrs C Taylor 329 Mrs M J Snowdo
Page 87 and 88: 3. JOBS Where can we find land for
Page 89 and 90: 021 Mr P Jermyn There is enough spa
Page 91 and 92: 063 Mr B A Stammers Broardband mean
Page 93 and 94: 113 Mr & Mrs Rowland Apprentaships
Page 95 and 96: 158 Mr & Mrs White 159 Mr & Mrs J C
Page 97 and 98: 193 Ms S Swift Should be on sites v
Page 99 and 100: 236 Mr & Mrs Beattie Transport link
Page 101 and 102: 274 Mr S Mckinnon Employment where
Page 103 and 104: 321 R J Feather How will the jobs b
Page 105 and 106: 4. PROTECTION Are there any other a
Page 107 and 108: 026 Mr A Lantaff As stated earlier
Page 109 and 110: 073 Mr S Learmouth I believe strong
Page 111 and 112: 136 Mrs G E Chase Protect our areas
Page 113 and 114: 178 Mr D Livermore Protect all of t
Page 115 and 116: 228 Ms A Henderson I think the coun
Page 117 and 118: 261 S A Skinner 262 Ms L Parish I w
Page 119 and 120: 301 Ms K Kelly 4.3 Protection and e
Page 121 and 122: 354 Mrs Smith This side of the rive
Page 123 and 124: Rep No Contact Name Character Comme
Page 125 and 126: 052 Mr & Mrs D Lench Too many expen
Page 127 and 128: 106 Ms P Melito Rochford should alw
Page 129: 166 G W Fleming All aeras must be m
Page 133 and 134: 251 Mr B Guyett - Chairman No, you
Page 135 and 136: 301 Ms K Kelly 4.9 Good design and
Page 137 and 138: 359 Mr New The district is short of
Page 139 and 140: Rep No Contact Name Energy & Water
Page 141 and 142: 046 Mr & Mrs J Cripps See 1.0 - why
Page 143 and 144: 093 Mrs M J Owoo I think you are do
Page 145 and 146: 140 Mrs J Davies If you are referin
Page 147 and 148: 181 Mrs M R Hutchings What do you m
Page 149 and 150: 224 Mr K S Gee Water - there are se
Page 151 and 152: 263 Mr P Kneen Whilst Swan Hill ack
Page 153 and 154: 307 Mr J Snow Extra development mea
Page 155 and 156: 7. LEISURE, TOURISM & COMMUNITY FAC
Page 157 and 158: 027 Mr B Fuller Leisure facilities
Page 159 and 160: 069 Mrs B Buckland 070 P Robertson
Page 161 and 162: 112 A J Smythe Green Burial sites -
Page 163 and 164: 156 J W Collins Rochford does not n
Page 165 and 166: 190 Mr G J Tinsey New facilities sh
Page 167 and 168: 235 L W Lewis There are not enough
Page 169 and 170: 268 Mr S Crussell We don't really h
Page 171 and 172: 317 Mr D Harris Having attended a '
Page 173 and 174: 359 Mr New I do not see this as a t
Page 175 and 176: Rep No Contact Name CPO and Plannin
Page 177 and 178: 057 Mrs J Williams Developers shoul
Page 179 and 180: 102 Mr T Newton Compulsory purchase
Page 181 and 182:
158 Mr & Mrs White Some compulsory
Page 183 and 184:
196 Mr A E Hodges The voluntary app
Page 185 and 186:
246 Miss M Saward No this is not fa
Page 187 and 188:
306 Mr E C Cook See comments under
Page 189 and 190:
362 Ms M Power Circular 1/97 provid
show all

Planning - Summary of all comments - Amazon Web Services

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?