Planning - Summary of all comments - Amazon Web Services

136 Mrs G E Chase
Protect our areas, we must have parks and areas for playing fields. Everyone is getting too fat, so give us something to at
least get the youngsters having somewhere to play. Not everyone can afford leisure centre fees.
137 Mr & Mrs Acres Lane along the river Crouch should be protected for wildlife.
Keep as many green areas as possible. No planning permission should be granted for the development of school playing
138 The Occupier
fields etc.
Concentrate on working with the development of tides to enable Thames flood plain to work as such. Don't cover it in
139 Ms A Clark
concrete.
I like to think that the balance is about right. I don't want to see any destruction to our countryside. I use our recreational
facilities as well as enjoying our countryside but this hasn't solved the problem you face about development has it? There is
loads out there already except maybe something for the teenagers - they need to be questioned/surveyed as to what they
140 Mrs J Davies
would like/and affordable to them.
The Upper Roach Valley is a good area for increasing recreational opportunities. Ancient woodlands. Green belt and the
141 Mr & Mrs Sarchet gaps between settlements must be protected to save the South East of Essex becoming an urban sprawl.
142 D Tilley/R Bhandari What has become of the Cherry Orchard Park? What is being built adjacent to it with no publicity?
143 J E Burfield Recreation O.K. but any structure encuorages builders to seek ways of building houses
145 Mr A Lysons The £64,000,000 question.
146 A C Barton Do not have knowledge
Rochford has more than its fair share of business premises that have not been developed for many years. These tend to
make our town centre unattractive and unappealing. A relaxation on business rates might encourage their usage! Upper
147 Mr I Randall
Roach Valley is a good area for increasing recreation opportunities. Not sure about the balance!
148 L F Wallace No, stop the meddling by planners.
149 Cunningham About right
150 Ms N Saunders Protect ALL green belt land. There's too much development - we need our green spaces kept green.
A large area is being developed in Cherry Orchard Way. To display, in the open for all to see a massive car show area.
What a monstrosity. Hundreds of cars in view. I'm sure this does nothing to enhance the area. Giving planning permission
151 Mr R Roles
for this type of development must have been Rochford Planning Department's finest hour.
The character of the Rayleigh/Rochford area must be preserved at all costs. South of Rayleigh/Rochford is an urban sprawl
152 Mr S Crowther
from Thurrock to Shoebury. Rayleigh/Rochford mustn't go the same way.
The balance has recently tipped in favour of development, it is time to readdress the balance for recreation. The proposed
extension to the Cherry Orchard Country Park in the Roach Valley is a start. Hockley woods should also be protected from
153 Mrs S Bradshaw any further encroachment. All greeen spaces and green belt areas should remain protected.
155 Ms A Boulter The River Roach at Paglesham needs protection - control re "house boats" litter etc.
As more development takes place, green spaces will diminish. Settlements need to be kept away from each other. Once
one new rural development is allowed, others will follow and kill off open spaces bit by bit. Remember the old adage you
156 J W Collins
don't know what you've got til it's gone? Future generations will not want to live in an urban sprawl.
The Upper Roach Valley and Hockley woods are much needed and should be enlarged. Would these areas be protected in
158 Mr & Mrs White the future from politicians loony development schemes?
I cannot comment on the Roach Valley as I do not have any knowledge of it! Regarding the balance between recreation
159 Mr & Mrs J Collins and development opportunities there should not be too much of either.