Planning - Summary of all comments - Amazon Web Services

More documents

Recommendations

Info

324 Mrs Doward No development should be allowed that would spoil the character of an existing town or village. If building a new town/village then that would be given a character of its own. 325 Mr D Elwell Agreed - no further comments Build environment does have a special character and everything (within the council's power) should be done to preserve this 326 Owner/Occupier character design and landscaping is important in all areas. Most sites can benefit from a well designed layout and where possible provide facilities as well as access for all including wheel-chairs. I remember trying to push my friend up high kerbs in her wheel chair - if possible some outdoor walks via footpaths (public) do benefit disabled people to still appreciate landscaping and access to the countryside. I do support 327 Mrs C Taylor publication of a local list so anyone may have their say and put forward their views/comments. The character of the area should be preserved but this policy is rather too late for much of Rayleigh High Street. Design 329 Mrs M J Snowdon and landscaping is always important in the hopes that a pleasing environment may reduce the current trend of vandalism. Design and landscaping is always important. Areas such as the A127 and Websters Way are examples of poor design etc. Industrial estates often exhibit poor design. People must be encouraged to maintain buildings and the land around them. Much more should be done to encourage careful disposal and control of business and commercial waste eg Websters Way 330 P Mansbridge shops. Design and landscaping is always very important. This makes or breaks a community or area. The improvement to Rayleigh High Street after the disasters of the 60's and 70's are a good example, although almost too late as many buildings have already gone. Design does not have to reproduce 'olde worlde' styles but must be top quality with good materials 331 Mr A C Cooper which will age well. Landscaping needs to be low maintenance. This area is seen by many outsiders as desirable so the character is to be maintained or improved to stop it deteriorating 332 Mr & Mrs Jones into an inner-city slum or close to. Design and good landscaping are important in all areas. We believe a local list could help to ensure the individuality and 333 Mr & Mrs Hopkins character of the area. 334 Mrs Amey The extra trees and shrubs planted in Hockley have added to the character as it would on any new developments Character must be kept in planning practice - the need for the area to be visually appealing. A list would need to include the best examples ? ? Paper - not architects - think have appeal. RDC needs to look at all areas and see what ? Character can 347 Mr C Rooke be brought in. Local list is a good idea. Developers must be made to fit the character of the area and if they have a list to consult there is 349 Ms C Paine no excuse. Too many interesting buildings are being replaced with inferior looking developments. I think the council could do a lot 350 Mr A James more in this area. I hope that Parish Councils will be consulted regarding a local list. It will only be of use if it is linked to planning issues so 352 Cllr Joyce Smith that enforcement action can be taken if needed. Sympathetic design and landscaping are vitally important in every development, if ghettos of the future are to be avoided. A local list should be put to the local residents and approved by them before any development starts, new or updated. This 354 Mrs Smith list should be given maximum publicity. Design and landscaping is important ion all parts of the area to maintain the histroci character of the district. A local list would be a good idea and all developers required to use these as good examples of suitable design. However, this should 356 Mr & Mrs D Dobbin not be a straitjacket and allowance should be made for progress in design. 358 Mr & Mrs England Design and landscaping is important. New development at Rawreth would not spoil Rochford or existing historic villages.
359 Mr New The district is short of large park areas, long distance walks and open spaces. New development should blend The Council on the basis of soundess principles should not introduce local designations in order to resist development proposals. Where landscape and built form characteristics are worthy of nationally recognised designations, these should form the basis of continued landscape protection or historic protection. Other criteria/sequentially based policies also provide a sound basis against which to resist built development in sensitive locations. The Council is aware that Design and Access Statements are now a requirement of the P&CPA 2004 for major developemnt proposals and therefore there is no separate requirement for such statements to be specifically advocated as part of the application process. Landscaping is important to development and good design however, it is not always appropriate to seek to agree all details of a scheme as part of a current planning application and the use of appropriately worded conditions to be discharged prior to implementation can address the necessary detail and agreement with the Council. Policies for lifetime home standards 362 Ms M Power should be based upon particular site circumstances and requirements to provide an element of such homes. Percentages sh The district does have a special character. The new housing required needs to be spread around the district so that no one 365 Mrs H J Springham area is totally ruined. Yes the local area does have a special character. The proposed additional building will help to ruin this. Lobby the 366 Mr S J Springham Government to build in less heavily populated areas of the country. 369 Mr & Mrs Gauden Sorry but the characters of Rochford and Ashingdon have already been spoilt by too much development. Design and landscaping is always important and so is the consideration of existing residents. Has the option of underground or partially underground buildings been investigated. It may be more expensive but should be more environmentally friendly. Maybe developers should contribute a percentage of profits towards such projects, for every conventional build 370 Mr G Biner they should build and environmentally friendly house.
Page 1 and 2:
ROCHFORD DISTRICT LOCAL DEVELOPMENT
Page 3 and 4:
Rep No Contact Name General comment
Page 5 and 6:
024 Mr P Williams 025 Mrs P Clifton
Page 7 and 8:
050 Mrs J Samuels 051 Mrs D Langdon
Page 9 and 10:
069 Mrs B Buckland 070 P Robertson
Page 11 and 12:
091 Ms P Bailey 092 Mrs M Hills 095
Page 13 and 14:
121 Mrs S J Attfield 122 F E Wells
Page 15 and 16:
144 Mr C Bambury 145 Mr A Lysons 14
Page 17 and 18:
159 Mr & Mrs J Collins I do not hav
Page 19 and 20:
177 Mr J East 178 Mr D Livermore 17
Page 21 and 22:
198 Mr J Clamp 200 Mr T O'Shea 201
Page 23 and 24:
222 R Luck 225 Mr P Court 227 Mr &
Page 25 and 26:
246 Miss M Saward 248 Mr A Presslee
Page 27 and 28:
259 Mr M B Rogers 260 Mr & Mrs Will
Page 29 and 30:
272 Mr A Patton 273 Mr J Wilson 274
Page 31 and 32:
300 Mrs Upson I have answered this
Page 33 and 34:
322 Ms J Hitchcock 323 Mr T Beebee
Page 35 and 36:
338 Mr & Mrs Saunders We have been
Page 37 and 38:
357 Ms V O'Malley Perhaps the gover
Page 39 and 40:
1. HOUSING Where should land be rel
Page 41 and 42:
014 D Hanrahan I do not agree furth
Page 43 and 44:
040 Mr D Huskisson The Ashingdon Ro
Page 45 and 46:
070 P Robertson Rayleigh and the su
Page 47 and 48:
102 Mr T Newton Firstly why are you
Page 49 and 50:
130 Mrs S Martin 131 Mel Bennett 13
Page 51 and 52:
160 Ms S Barnes No green belt shoul
Page 53 and 54:
189 Mr G Gooding 190 Mr G J Tinsey
Page 55 and 56:
215 Mr T R Thompson 216 Mr & Mrs D
Page 57 and 58:
237 Mr Sanders We should not be rel
Page 59 and 60:
263 Mr P Kneen 264 Mr K Coleman 265
Page 61 and 62:
286 Mr L F Knight No more housing w
Page 63 and 64:
319 Mr M Lang Not down in this corn
Page 65 and 66:
355 Mr K Vingoe 356 Mr & Mrs D Dobb
Page 67 and 68:
2. AFFORDABLE HOUSING Have we got t
Page 69 and 70:
Mr R Huckett & Ms C Mobbs Affordabl
Page 71 and 72:
065 Mr T Bennett Affordable (truly
Page 73 and 74:
104 B Aspinall In my opinion the cu
Page 75 and 76:
145 Mr A Lysons There is no wy I ca
Page 77 and 78:
180 Mr R Swain Local jobs are usual
Page 79 and 80:
213 Mr M Wheeler 215 Mr T R Thompso
Page 81 and 82:
251 Mr B Guyett - Chairman We agree
Page 83 and 84:
287 Mr R Forster Cannot comment as
Page 85 and 86: 327 Mrs C Taylor 329 Mrs M J Snowdo
Page 87 and 88: 3. JOBS Where can we find land for
Page 89 and 90: 021 Mr P Jermyn There is enough spa
Page 91 and 92: 063 Mr B A Stammers Broardband mean
Page 93 and 94: 113 Mr & Mrs Rowland Apprentaships
Page 95 and 96: 158 Mr & Mrs White 159 Mr & Mrs J C
Page 97 and 98: 193 Ms S Swift Should be on sites v
Page 99 and 100: 236 Mr & Mrs Beattie Transport link
Page 101 and 102: 274 Mr S Mckinnon Employment where
Page 103 and 104: 321 R J Feather How will the jobs b
Page 105 and 106: 4. PROTECTION Are there any other a
Page 107 and 108: 026 Mr A Lantaff As stated earlier
Page 109 and 110: 073 Mr S Learmouth I believe strong
Page 111 and 112: 136 Mrs G E Chase Protect our areas
Page 113 and 114: 178 Mr D Livermore Protect all of t
Page 115 and 116: 228 Ms A Henderson I think the coun
Page 117 and 118: 261 S A Skinner 262 Ms L Parish I w
Page 119 and 120: 301 Ms K Kelly 4.3 Protection and e
Page 121 and 122: 354 Mrs Smith This side of the rive
Page 123 and 124: Rep No Contact Name Character Comme
Page 125 and 126: 052 Mr & Mrs D Lench Too many expen
Page 127 and 128: 106 Ms P Melito Rochford should alw
Page 129 and 130: 166 G W Fleming All aeras must be m
Page 131 and 132: 204 Mr R Gould As before 205 Mrs Wh
Page 133 and 134: 251 Mr B Guyett - Chairman No, you
Page 135: 301 Ms K Kelly 4.9 Good design and
Page 139 and 140: Rep No Contact Name Energy & Water
Page 141 and 142: 046 Mr & Mrs J Cripps See 1.0 - why
Page 143 and 144: 093 Mrs M J Owoo I think you are do
Page 145 and 146: 140 Mrs J Davies If you are referin
Page 147 and 148: 181 Mrs M R Hutchings What do you m
Page 149 and 150: 224 Mr K S Gee Water - there are se
Page 151 and 152: 263 Mr P Kneen Whilst Swan Hill ack
Page 153 and 154: 307 Mr J Snow Extra development mea
Page 155 and 156: 7. LEISURE, TOURISM & COMMUNITY FAC
Page 157 and 158: 027 Mr B Fuller Leisure facilities
Page 159 and 160: 069 Mrs B Buckland 070 P Robertson
Page 161 and 162: 112 A J Smythe Green Burial sites -
Page 163 and 164: 156 J W Collins Rochford does not n
Page 165 and 166: 190 Mr G J Tinsey New facilities sh
Page 167 and 168: 235 L W Lewis There are not enough
Page 169 and 170: 268 Mr S Crussell We don't really h
Page 171 and 172: 317 Mr D Harris Having attended a '
Page 173 and 174: 359 Mr New I do not see this as a t
Page 175 and 176: Rep No Contact Name CPO and Plannin
Page 177 and 178: 057 Mrs J Williams Developers shoul
Page 179 and 180: 102 Mr T Newton Compulsory purchase
Page 181 and 182: 158 Mr & Mrs White Some compulsory
Page 183 and 184: 196 Mr A E Hodges The voluntary app
Page 185 and 186: 246 Miss M Saward No this is not fa
Page 187 and 188:
306 Mr E C Cook See comments under
Page 189 and 190:
362 Ms M Power Circular 1/97 provid
show all

Planning - Summary of all comments - Amazon Web Services

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?