24.07.2013 Views

Planning - Summary of all comments - Amazon Web Services

Planning - Summary of all comments - Amazon Web Services

Planning - Summary of all comments - Amazon Web Services

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

175 Mr H J Rowland<br />

176 Mr R Abbott<br />

177 Mr J East<br />

Around existing settlements, to reduce travel. The important factors are a company which can survive and not pollute the<br />

environment.<br />

Jobs - aer we supplying for people outside our area, thus putting further strain on transport? Is it about the council<br />

sustaining their income in lates? The industrial areas should continue to be away from private accommodation eg houses,<br />

but, with good access to major road systems, existing brownfield sites should be looked at.<br />

New employment sites should be pleasant places to work in, but should not be an eyesore or a blot on the landscape. Most<br />

<strong>of</strong> our local sites are relatively sm<strong>all</strong>, unobtrusive and seemingly well used (eg Weir site and Shotgate). How many<br />

residents <strong>of</strong> the Rawreth Lane industrial and leisure site work a short walk from their homes? [There should be some<br />

tangible incentive given to those wish to live close to their place <strong>of</strong> employment - Government money].<br />

178 Mr D Livermore<br />

Enough with this! Create jobs for houses, houses for jobs, it's a vicious circle. The major issue here is that the south east is<br />

at breaking point just servicing London it doesn't need more and more people, more and more jobs and industry, more and<br />

more over-crowding, more and more lawlessness more and more disaffected teenagers with less and less open space.<br />

179 Mrs F M Wilson Plenty <strong>of</strong> existing industrial sites around which are empty - as more businesses move abroad or go bust.<br />

No new land should be used for jobs. Exisiting industrial estates should be used wherever possible. Jobs and housing<br />

should be co-located. It doesn't seem sensible to locate jobs in one part <strong>of</strong> the district and housing in another. I see<br />

Sainsbury's are developing on Rayleigh Weir site. They have a one storey site with massive car park occupying much land -<br />

180 Mr R Swain<br />

if this was 4 storey with a 4 storey car park it would occupy one quarter <strong>of</strong> the land freeing space for development.<br />

181 Mrs M R Hutchings Making sure there is shopping and transport for people to travel to get to work, before you start building.<br />

182 Mrs V Wisbey Existing industrial estates need to be re-furbished to encourage investors and big business<br />

183 Tomassi Existing sites are suitable to be developed first.<br />

Both jobs and housing have to accessible before either are provided the roads and other infrastructure must be improved.<br />

The statement that "if more roads are built, more people will use them" also applies to housing ie the more you build the<br />

184 Mr T L Ellis<br />

more people will live in them! Roads and parking first!<br />

185 Mr J K Mills Develop 'brown field' sites and also the old brick fields in Great Wakering and in Cherry Orchard Way in Rochford.<br />

187 Mrs K Jesty Industrial areas should be expanded or used appropriately as the infrastructure is in place already<br />

188 Mr A Mackay<br />

189 Mr G Gooding<br />

190 Mr G J Tinsey<br />

191 Janice & Alex Brining<br />

192 Ms B Mean<br />

Don't know where you get the magic number <strong>of</strong> 2000 new jobs that need accommodating. Need is implying that these jobs<br />

exist now! That only the land is missing and you quote 'aviation related business' which suggests expansion at the airport, a<br />

strange conundrum for a council to put to it's residents when under the guise <strong>of</strong> global warming the government is<br />

considering 'green taxes' whatever that means, to keep <strong>all</strong> but the wealthy out <strong>of</strong> aeroplanes. You need to re-think this one.<br />

The problem with the area is that there are few quality jobs. Improvements in the local infrastructure would make the area<br />

more attractive to businesses.<br />

Existing industrial estates are the natural choice to develop furhter. Although lorry traffic is a problem, with a particular the<br />

signpost standard poor. In addition new development should be close to railway access with water transport if practicable.<br />

Development <strong>of</strong> existing Southend Airport - always talked about but nothing happens. Would bring new jobs and those that<br />

work at airport would want to live near it. Liverpool Street trains could provide better travelling facilities eg air con.<br />

Many existing industrial sites are under used with empty buildings/<strong>of</strong>fices on them. New industry is better kept to the<br />

outskirts <strong>of</strong> towns and should be in keeping with the landscape. Preferably screened with trees!

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!