Planning - Summary of all comments - Amazon Web Services
Planning - Summary of all comments - Amazon Web Services
Planning - Summary of all comments - Amazon Web Services
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
175 Mr H J Rowland<br />
176 Mr R Abbott<br />
177 Mr J East<br />
Around existing settlements, to reduce travel. The important factors are a company which can survive and not pollute the<br />
environment.<br />
Jobs - aer we supplying for people outside our area, thus putting further strain on transport? Is it about the council<br />
sustaining their income in lates? The industrial areas should continue to be away from private accommodation eg houses,<br />
but, with good access to major road systems, existing brownfield sites should be looked at.<br />
New employment sites should be pleasant places to work in, but should not be an eyesore or a blot on the landscape. Most<br />
<strong>of</strong> our local sites are relatively sm<strong>all</strong>, unobtrusive and seemingly well used (eg Weir site and Shotgate). How many<br />
residents <strong>of</strong> the Rawreth Lane industrial and leisure site work a short walk from their homes? [There should be some<br />
tangible incentive given to those wish to live close to their place <strong>of</strong> employment - Government money].<br />
178 Mr D Livermore<br />
Enough with this! Create jobs for houses, houses for jobs, it's a vicious circle. The major issue here is that the south east is<br />
at breaking point just servicing London it doesn't need more and more people, more and more jobs and industry, more and<br />
more over-crowding, more and more lawlessness more and more disaffected teenagers with less and less open space.<br />
179 Mrs F M Wilson Plenty <strong>of</strong> existing industrial sites around which are empty - as more businesses move abroad or go bust.<br />
No new land should be used for jobs. Exisiting industrial estates should be used wherever possible. Jobs and housing<br />
should be co-located. It doesn't seem sensible to locate jobs in one part <strong>of</strong> the district and housing in another. I see<br />
Sainsbury's are developing on Rayleigh Weir site. They have a one storey site with massive car park occupying much land -<br />
180 Mr R Swain<br />
if this was 4 storey with a 4 storey car park it would occupy one quarter <strong>of</strong> the land freeing space for development.<br />
181 Mrs M R Hutchings Making sure there is shopping and transport for people to travel to get to work, before you start building.<br />
182 Mrs V Wisbey Existing industrial estates need to be re-furbished to encourage investors and big business<br />
183 Tomassi Existing sites are suitable to be developed first.<br />
Both jobs and housing have to accessible before either are provided the roads and other infrastructure must be improved.<br />
The statement that "if more roads are built, more people will use them" also applies to housing ie the more you build the<br />
184 Mr T L Ellis<br />
more people will live in them! Roads and parking first!<br />
185 Mr J K Mills Develop 'brown field' sites and also the old brick fields in Great Wakering and in Cherry Orchard Way in Rochford.<br />
187 Mrs K Jesty Industrial areas should be expanded or used appropriately as the infrastructure is in place already<br />
188 Mr A Mackay<br />
189 Mr G Gooding<br />
190 Mr G J Tinsey<br />
191 Janice & Alex Brining<br />
192 Ms B Mean<br />
Don't know where you get the magic number <strong>of</strong> 2000 new jobs that need accommodating. Need is implying that these jobs<br />
exist now! That only the land is missing and you quote 'aviation related business' which suggests expansion at the airport, a<br />
strange conundrum for a council to put to it's residents when under the guise <strong>of</strong> global warming the government is<br />
considering 'green taxes' whatever that means, to keep <strong>all</strong> but the wealthy out <strong>of</strong> aeroplanes. You need to re-think this one.<br />
The problem with the area is that there are few quality jobs. Improvements in the local infrastructure would make the area<br />
more attractive to businesses.<br />
Existing industrial estates are the natural choice to develop furhter. Although lorry traffic is a problem, with a particular the<br />
signpost standard poor. In addition new development should be close to railway access with water transport if practicable.<br />
Development <strong>of</strong> existing Southend Airport - always talked about but nothing happens. Would bring new jobs and those that<br />
work at airport would want to live near it. Liverpool Street trains could provide better travelling facilities eg air con.<br />
Many existing industrial sites are under used with empty buildings/<strong>of</strong>fices on them. New industry is better kept to the<br />
outskirts <strong>of</strong> towns and should be in keeping with the landscape. Preferably screened with trees!