Planning - Summary of all comments - Amazon Web Services

More documents

Recommendations

Info

258 Land for jobs could be around existing settlements to minimise commuting. Plan in 1 [comments on housing] would include local labour. At the moment in big estates tradesmen are travelling from Hertfordshire, Kent and Suffolk causing international damage, car fumes and traffic chaos. Sites like Kirbys Breakers Yard at Ashingdon and the Gasometer site at Rayleigh should have been kept as industrial sites. They should have had the top 259 Mr M B Rogers six feet of soil removed to clear any carcinogens It should be away from existing settlements. It will only add to congested roads, they should be built so there is a slow 260 Mr & Mrs Willey dispersal point out of the factory, not joining already congested points. The Rochford District lies in the commuter belt for London. Finding ways of making it more pleasant, easier and more affordable to get to London for work should be a key part of the Council's strategy. Please don't release Green Belt land for 261 S A Skinner more industrial estates. 262 Ms L Parish 263 Mr P Kneen 265 Mr R Pomery 267 Mr D Pointer 268 Mr S Crussell 270 There appears to be scope to extend Purdey's Industrial Estate in Rochford and Rawreth Lane Industrial Estate in Rayleigh. If Rochford agreed to an outer bypass, some industrial estates could be sited at suitable locations on this route. In accepting a bypass, more protection would be given to Rochford, Hawkwell, Hockley, Rayleigh and Hullbridge. Also finance could be sought from Industrial Estate developers towards the cost of the road and compulsory purchase orders for the land. Government policy on the provision of employment land seeks to ensure it is located so as to minimise the need to travel, particularly by private car. Given the predominantly rural nature of the District, this can be considered somewhat problematic. Swan Hill considers it is important that new employment development is well related to the existing population, and that new businesses are located so as to ensure that those businesses likely to result in the greatest conflict for residential properties, in terms of noise and pollution, are located so as to minimise their impact. The most sustainable way of providing new employment is through the use of mixed-use developments. This would ensure that new houses and businesses are located in relatively close proximity, to enable people to travel to work by sustainable means. As such, in order for the District Council to be able to meet its strategic employment requireemnt of 3,000 additional jobs, it is considered important that they allow a flexible approach to the use of land, particularly in sustainable locations, such as on Insufficient evidence is put forward to substantial the points made at paragraph 4.8.5. Estates referred to in paragraph 4.8.6 need identification. Reference should be made to mixed use development at such locations. The number of jobs (as alluded to in the options - paragraph 4.8.7) should be based on evidence. Further employment sites should be around existing settlements. As existing industrial estates become tired they should be refreshed by replacement of existing units. New units could be larger than existing units. Redevelopment of existing (dated and ineficient) areas should be considered rather than into new. Develop roads and transport links to support and encourage this. We suggest that the widely different target figure of 2000 (section 4.81) and 3000 jobs (section 4.85) indicate the great difficulty in predicting future employment areas. We would therefore suggest that allocating a total number of new jobs in the district for the next 15 years is unlikely to be a helpful exercise. Perhaps a better target would be a intention to reduce UNemployment within the district to below a target figure. This would generate a better quality of life increase for local residents. Any new business developments should be along existing main trunk roads and not involve new road building or major road upgrades. Any placed on green field sites should have strong biodiversity criteria and environmental impact input into potential siting.
274 Mr S Mckinnon Employment where possible should be created via the development of brown field sites. Loss of employment due to change of use to residential should be avoided. Redundant farm buildings should be given priority to be replaced/reclassified to provide new employment. Employment land should be well related to urban areas and to transport infrastructure, and existing vacant employment sites which are inappropriately located in these terms and/or which have an adverse impact on visual amenity should be 275 Mr C Wickham redeveloped for housing purposes. As stated, all potential sites should be tested against the sustainability criteria and the PPG/PPS25 Sequential Test. For this reason, we would prefer to see allocations, which will enable these processes to be more easily carried out. At present the document does not consider pollution prevention. It will need to be ensured that all development does not pose a threat 276 Mr M Barrell to the natural environment during construction stage or during occupation. 277 Ms S A Elkington Use the industrial areas already in RDC and expand but improve infrastructure. Are the people who the extra houses are intended for, wanting to be working in the local area, and would the types your 278 Mr P Marshall building for expect the London rates of pay. 279 S J Heeney Not enough information to answer With the new industrial estate progressing in Cherry Orchard Lane, plus empty units in existing estates. Plus all the empty 280 Mrs M A Tyrell office space in Victoria Avenue, Southend and the like. I am sure we are well on the way. Lane for jobs should be around existing settlements. The less people need to travel long distances to work the better. With 285 Mrs B E Dale global warming a reality, if people can walk, cycle or use public transport to get to work so much the better. 286 Mr L F Knight If multi millionaires set aside farm land. If you create new sites, access is important as roads are already congested, take Sutton Road and Rawreth Lane as 287 Mr R Forster examples. 288 Mr & Mrs C Cummins Consider using land each side of the A127 between Rayleigh Weir and Progress Road to create employment sites 1. Infrastructure:- people need easy access to place of work - not necessarily by car. 2. Use existing industrial estates. 3. 289 Mrs J Warner Utilise old industrial sites. 290 Ms E Davis Building should be carefully chosen on existing sites and not in clumps to make more concrete jungles. We are pleased to see an indication of the number of jobs to be accommodated in the District in paragraph 4.8.5. However, we would expect the preferred options document to clearly indicate the broad extra employment land requirements necessary to contribute to meeting the job figures at broad locations in the District ie the amount and broad locations of new employment land that will be required to be identified and allocated in the Site Allocations DPD. The Government Office acknowledges that not all of the new jobs will be delivered as a consequence of the development of new employment land, and that some will come from increased job density at existing premises, refurbishment of existing buildings and job creation from other uses (retail, leisure related) etc. However, should new employment land be needed to contribute to meeting the policy's job targets, we would expect the preferred options policy to include a broad indication of the amount of 291 Maydo Pitt land, and possibly even an indication of the broad employment type to be accommodated at the different broad locations, in A new town should incorporate areas for employment. Perhaps our waterways around the River Crouch and Roach should 292 Mr & Mrs Goring be utilized for water related leisure and tourism based jobs - these are the areas natural assets. To ensure sustainable economic growth consider purpose built business park in the west of the district. Business incubation centre or managed workspace. Green belt issues relating to job growth for our existing indigenous businesses for farm 296 Miss S Rom diversification.
Page 1 and 2:
ROCHFORD DISTRICT LOCAL DEVELOPMENT
Page 3 and 4:
Rep No Contact Name General comment
Page 5 and 6:
024 Mr P Williams 025 Mrs P Clifton
Page 7 and 8:
050 Mrs J Samuels 051 Mrs D Langdon
Page 9 and 10:
069 Mrs B Buckland 070 P Robertson
Page 11 and 12:
091 Ms P Bailey 092 Mrs M Hills 095
Page 13 and 14:
121 Mrs S J Attfield 122 F E Wells
Page 15 and 16:
144 Mr C Bambury 145 Mr A Lysons 14
Page 17 and 18:
159 Mr & Mrs J Collins I do not hav
Page 19 and 20:
177 Mr J East 178 Mr D Livermore 17
Page 21 and 22:
198 Mr J Clamp 200 Mr T O'Shea 201
Page 23 and 24:
222 R Luck 225 Mr P Court 227 Mr &
Page 25 and 26:
246 Miss M Saward 248 Mr A Presslee
Page 27 and 28:
259 Mr M B Rogers 260 Mr & Mrs Will
Page 29 and 30:
272 Mr A Patton 273 Mr J Wilson 274
Page 31 and 32:
300 Mrs Upson I have answered this
Page 33 and 34:
322 Ms J Hitchcock 323 Mr T Beebee
Page 35 and 36:
338 Mr & Mrs Saunders We have been
Page 37 and 38:
357 Ms V O'Malley Perhaps the gover
Page 39 and 40:
1. HOUSING Where should land be rel
Page 41 and 42:
014 D Hanrahan I do not agree furth
Page 43 and 44:
040 Mr D Huskisson The Ashingdon Ro
Page 45 and 46:
070 P Robertson Rayleigh and the su
Page 47 and 48:
102 Mr T Newton Firstly why are you
Page 49 and 50: 130 Mrs S Martin 131 Mel Bennett 13
Page 51 and 52: 160 Ms S Barnes No green belt shoul
Page 53 and 54: 189 Mr G Gooding 190 Mr G J Tinsey
Page 55 and 56: 215 Mr T R Thompson 216 Mr & Mrs D
Page 57 and 58: 237 Mr Sanders We should not be rel
Page 59 and 60: 263 Mr P Kneen 264 Mr K Coleman 265
Page 61 and 62: 286 Mr L F Knight No more housing w
Page 63 and 64: 319 Mr M Lang Not down in this corn
Page 65 and 66: 355 Mr K Vingoe 356 Mr & Mrs D Dobb
Page 67 and 68: 2. AFFORDABLE HOUSING Have we got t
Page 69 and 70: Mr R Huckett & Ms C Mobbs Affordabl
Page 71 and 72: 065 Mr T Bennett Affordable (truly
Page 73 and 74: 104 B Aspinall In my opinion the cu
Page 75 and 76: 145 Mr A Lysons There is no wy I ca
Page 77 and 78: 180 Mr R Swain Local jobs are usual
Page 79 and 80: 213 Mr M Wheeler 215 Mr T R Thompso
Page 81 and 82: 251 Mr B Guyett - Chairman We agree
Page 83 and 84: 287 Mr R Forster Cannot comment as
Page 85 and 86: 327 Mrs C Taylor 329 Mrs M J Snowdo
Page 87 and 88: 3. JOBS Where can we find land for
Page 89 and 90: 021 Mr P Jermyn There is enough spa
Page 91 and 92: 063 Mr B A Stammers Broardband mean
Page 93 and 94: 113 Mr & Mrs Rowland Apprentaships
Page 95 and 96: 158 Mr & Mrs White 159 Mr & Mrs J C
Page 97 and 98: 193 Ms S Swift Should be on sites v
Page 99: 236 Mr & Mrs Beattie Transport link
Page 103 and 104: 321 R J Feather How will the jobs b
Page 105 and 106: 4. PROTECTION Are there any other a
Page 107 and 108: 026 Mr A Lantaff As stated earlier
Page 109 and 110: 073 Mr S Learmouth I believe strong
Page 111 and 112: 136 Mrs G E Chase Protect our areas
Page 113 and 114: 178 Mr D Livermore Protect all of t
Page 115 and 116: 228 Ms A Henderson I think the coun
Page 117 and 118: 261 S A Skinner 262 Ms L Parish I w
Page 119 and 120: 301 Ms K Kelly 4.3 Protection and e
Page 121 and 122: 354 Mrs Smith This side of the rive
Page 123 and 124: Rep No Contact Name Character Comme
Page 125 and 126: 052 Mr & Mrs D Lench Too many expen
Page 127 and 128: 106 Ms P Melito Rochford should alw
Page 129 and 130: 166 G W Fleming All aeras must be m
Page 131 and 132: 204 Mr R Gould As before 205 Mrs Wh
Page 133 and 134: 251 Mr B Guyett - Chairman No, you
Page 135 and 136: 301 Ms K Kelly 4.9 Good design and
Page 137 and 138: 359 Mr New The district is short of
Page 139 and 140: Rep No Contact Name Energy & Water
Page 141 and 142: 046 Mr & Mrs J Cripps See 1.0 - why
Page 143 and 144: 093 Mrs M J Owoo I think you are do
Page 145 and 146: 140 Mrs J Davies If you are referin
Page 147 and 148: 181 Mrs M R Hutchings What do you m
Page 149 and 150: 224 Mr K S Gee Water - there are se
Page 151 and 152:
263 Mr P Kneen Whilst Swan Hill ack
Page 153 and 154:
307 Mr J Snow Extra development mea
Page 155 and 156:
7. LEISURE, TOURISM & COMMUNITY FAC
Page 157 and 158:
027 Mr B Fuller Leisure facilities
Page 159 and 160:
069 Mrs B Buckland 070 P Robertson
Page 161 and 162:
112 A J Smythe Green Burial sites -
Page 163 and 164:
156 J W Collins Rochford does not n
Page 165 and 166:
190 Mr G J Tinsey New facilities sh
Page 167 and 168:
235 L W Lewis There are not enough
Page 169 and 170:
268 Mr S Crussell We don't really h
Page 171 and 172:
317 Mr D Harris Having attended a '
Page 173 and 174:
359 Mr New I do not see this as a t
Page 175 and 176:
Rep No Contact Name CPO and Plannin
Page 177 and 178:
057 Mrs J Williams Developers shoul
Page 179 and 180:
102 Mr T Newton Compulsory purchase
Page 181 and 182:
158 Mr & Mrs White Some compulsory
Page 183 and 184:
196 Mr A E Hodges The voluntary app
Page 185 and 186:
246 Miss M Saward No this is not fa
Page 187 and 188:
306 Mr E C Cook See comments under
Page 189 and 190:
362 Ms M Power Circular 1/97 provid
show all

Planning - Summary of all comments - Amazon Web Services

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?