Planning - Summary of all comments - Amazon Web Services

More documents

Recommendations

Info

041 Mr McGee Too many houses over £250 thousand called executive houses. These houses take up the room of 2 houses in most cases even room for in there places for well designed flats Affordable housing is a good thing but we should not sacrifice area's just to build houses and loose what countryside we 043 Mr M Yorke Wade have. 045 Mr R Abbott Affordable housing is a major issue. Aim lower. Don't build high. 046 Mr & Mrs J Cripps Affordable housing for "keyworkers" yes, otherwise no - what I see is Council's using 'affordable housing' to solve "problem family" issues. Not fiar on the people just across the road who are paying full price - just not a sustainable idea (obvious!!). 047 Ms J Colbourne Private housing has always been difficult to attain for the younger generation - it is no harder now than it was 30 years ago to buy your first home, people want too much too soon they are not willing to wait for luxurys that they think are essential. 048 Mr S Reeves Affordable for who? It's about supply and demand surely, let the market place set the prices. 049 Mr & Mrs Kitchen Affordable housing in this area is not a major issue. We shold be aiming lower. Of course affordable housing is a national problem. If we make an analogy to roads, the M25 was supposed to solve all traffic ills! Building yet more houses puts too much pressure on the local infrastructure and social servies. Any housing provided by the council even if the quantity is increased is taken up by asylum seekers who have to be housed first and 050 Mrs J Samuels therefore does not benefit the indigenous population. 051 Mrs D Langdon How do we know without any figures given. More control over immigration would be the answer. Rochford's fourth worst in the country for rented housing, the proportion is extremely bad. It has been like this for decades, 052 Mr & Mrs D Lench it is disgraceful and very shameful. How much longer will Rochford be in the red area? 053 E Winn How can you build affordable housing with prices as high as they are in this area. 054 Mr & Mrs Todman Affordable housing should not be ? Into high specification development Yes it is a major issue. Most people struggle to get on the housing ladder as I did many years ago. However, I feel this 056 Mr S Lee generation have no chance. I cannot see a figure in the article. Yes, affordable housing is a major issue as it is already too hard for first time buyers to 057 Mrs J Williams get onto the property ladder. 059 Garfield Yes, affordable housing is a major issue but Essex has it's fair share of houses. 060 Mr S J Herbert The right figure is as close to '0' as possible. 061 Mr G W Slaughter Leave it as it is Affordable housing is a necessity for genuine home seekers. Owner - occupation is highly desirable in order to reduce demand for rented accommodation supported by 'benefit' financed by Council Tax payers. Supply and demand 062 Chris Taylor examination will reveal what the balance is. A mixture of all types of housing together is the best for all the people. Affordable housnig mix as you have it now is 063 Mr B A Stammers correct. I have no knowledge of affordable housing needs or the number being constructed. There is a need for affordable housing - new towns, buses and railways. People needing affordable housing cannot afford expensive travel. This matter is an issue 064 Mrs S Smith to be under consideration.
065 Mr T Bennett Affordable (truly affordable!) is a major issue if local service standards are to be maintained and improved…but they need to be made available on some sort of "contract basis", so that their original aim is not sold out for private profit. 066 Mr G Langhorn Affordable housing will continue to be an issue and stems back to the sale of council houses. Affordable housing should not be a major issue in this area. ? Dare to suggest that majority of wage earners work away from the area in view of the salaries paid in London. Obviously local ? Apply their professions weakly and for their staff 067 J D Carr along with Police, Teachers and nursing staff some provisions need to be considered. We consider council houses owned and maintained by local councils to be affordable housing. Not housing associations or 068 Mr & Mrs McDermott part ownership. As I have 2 sons in their early 20's affordable housing is important especially for this age group. Otherwise they will never leave home and be independent. Also for older people who want to down-size and release some equity because their 069 Mrs B Buckland pensions are not worth much now! The figure at the moment is about right aiming lower could have a very bad effect aiming lower could have a very bad 070 P Robertson effect regarding population density and stretched services and roads. Only if we want to make it one. Affordable housing must be a major requirement providing it is not detrimental to the 071 P Williams established housing and owners 072 Mr & Mrs S J Painter Supoprt building new town in the South East. There may be land in Hullbridge. 073 Mr S Learmouth Unable to answer If you mean by affordable housing flats which are springing up everywhere NO. We wouldn't have this problem if the 074 Mr & Mrs Raddon immigration was heandled poperly. Make use of unused sites. Stop building useless factories. As we have predominantly privately owned housing in the Southeast following the "right to buy scheme" affordable housing can only mean high density low quality and therefore low value homes in poor locations. Although interested in this subject for family reasons I have yet to hear of any scheme whereby house sellers sell at below market prices to enable poor people 075 Mr K A Cooke to buy. The types of housing being built should be aimed at first time buyers and should be further limited to very small developments only. We do not want a Chafford Hundred style development fo rthis area it is not only unecessary, but it 076 Ms G Lunn also gives every area a uniform and nondescript look devoid of any character. There could be some more affordable housing but only for the needs of local people and young people who cannot afford today's for too expensive housing. With houses being up to 4 times what they were 10 years ago, with salaries little more 077 Cllr Glen Dryhurst than then, affordable housing - for all is a major issue and problem. 078 David & Jeanne Yes. No. Why are builders given planning permission for 4 bedroom detatched properties? Three bedroom semi's are more practical 079 Mrs S Clark and affordable. There should be more practical houses. It has to be a major issue. It should be the responsibility of the employers of those requiring affordable housing to make suitable accommodation available to their staff either through leasing or renting arrangements and if necessary with tax incentives provided by 080 Mr C Hathaway Central Government. Most people I know at my age 30-35 cannot possibly obtain a mortgage for a one bed property most professionals earn 15- 081 T S Papworth 25K which is not enough to purchase even council right to buy schemes. One beds are approx 100K. 082 Mr J Adkin You have the right balance
Page 1 and 2:
ROCHFORD DISTRICT LOCAL DEVELOPMENT
Page 3 and 4:
Rep No Contact Name General comment
Page 5 and 6:
024 Mr P Williams 025 Mrs P Clifton
Page 7 and 8:
050 Mrs J Samuels 051 Mrs D Langdon
Page 9 and 10:
069 Mrs B Buckland 070 P Robertson
Page 11 and 12:
091 Ms P Bailey 092 Mrs M Hills 095
Page 13 and 14:
121 Mrs S J Attfield 122 F E Wells
Page 15 and 16:
144 Mr C Bambury 145 Mr A Lysons 14
Page 17 and 18:
159 Mr & Mrs J Collins I do not hav
Page 19 and 20: 177 Mr J East 178 Mr D Livermore 17
Page 21 and 22: 198 Mr J Clamp 200 Mr T O'Shea 201
Page 23 and 24: 222 R Luck 225 Mr P Court 227 Mr &
Page 25 and 26: 246 Miss M Saward 248 Mr A Presslee
Page 27 and 28: 259 Mr M B Rogers 260 Mr & Mrs Will
Page 29 and 30: 272 Mr A Patton 273 Mr J Wilson 274
Page 31 and 32: 300 Mrs Upson I have answered this
Page 33 and 34: 322 Ms J Hitchcock 323 Mr T Beebee
Page 35 and 36: 338 Mr & Mrs Saunders We have been
Page 37 and 38: 357 Ms V O'Malley Perhaps the gover
Page 39 and 40: 1. HOUSING Where should land be rel
Page 41 and 42: 014 D Hanrahan I do not agree furth
Page 43 and 44: 040 Mr D Huskisson The Ashingdon Ro
Page 45 and 46: 070 P Robertson Rayleigh and the su
Page 47 and 48: 102 Mr T Newton Firstly why are you
Page 49 and 50: 130 Mrs S Martin 131 Mel Bennett 13
Page 51 and 52: 160 Ms S Barnes No green belt shoul
Page 53 and 54: 189 Mr G Gooding 190 Mr G J Tinsey
Page 55 and 56: 215 Mr T R Thompson 216 Mr & Mrs D
Page 57 and 58: 237 Mr Sanders We should not be rel
Page 59 and 60: 263 Mr P Kneen 264 Mr K Coleman 265
Page 61 and 62: 286 Mr L F Knight No more housing w
Page 63 and 64: 319 Mr M Lang Not down in this corn
Page 65 and 66: 355 Mr K Vingoe 356 Mr & Mrs D Dobb
Page 67 and 68: 2. AFFORDABLE HOUSING Have we got t
Page 69: Mr R Huckett & Ms C Mobbs Affordabl
Page 73 and 74: 104 B Aspinall In my opinion the cu
Page 75 and 76: 145 Mr A Lysons There is no wy I ca
Page 77 and 78: 180 Mr R Swain Local jobs are usual
Page 79 and 80: 213 Mr M Wheeler 215 Mr T R Thompso
Page 81 and 82: 251 Mr B Guyett - Chairman We agree
Page 83 and 84: 287 Mr R Forster Cannot comment as
Page 85 and 86: 327 Mrs C Taylor 329 Mrs M J Snowdo
Page 87 and 88: 3. JOBS Where can we find land for
Page 89 and 90: 021 Mr P Jermyn There is enough spa
Page 91 and 92: 063 Mr B A Stammers Broardband mean
Page 93 and 94: 113 Mr & Mrs Rowland Apprentaships
Page 95 and 96: 158 Mr & Mrs White 159 Mr & Mrs J C
Page 97 and 98: 193 Ms S Swift Should be on sites v
Page 99 and 100: 236 Mr & Mrs Beattie Transport link
Page 101 and 102: 274 Mr S Mckinnon Employment where
Page 103 and 104: 321 R J Feather How will the jobs b
Page 105 and 106: 4. PROTECTION Are there any other a
Page 107 and 108: 026 Mr A Lantaff As stated earlier
Page 109 and 110: 073 Mr S Learmouth I believe strong
Page 111 and 112: 136 Mrs G E Chase Protect our areas
Page 113 and 114: 178 Mr D Livermore Protect all of t
Page 115 and 116: 228 Ms A Henderson I think the coun
Page 117 and 118: 261 S A Skinner 262 Ms L Parish I w
Page 119 and 120: 301 Ms K Kelly 4.3 Protection and e
Page 121 and 122:
354 Mrs Smith This side of the rive
Page 123 and 124:
Rep No Contact Name Character Comme
Page 125 and 126:
052 Mr & Mrs D Lench Too many expen
Page 127 and 128:
106 Ms P Melito Rochford should alw
Page 129 and 130:
166 G W Fleming All aeras must be m
Page 131 and 132:
204 Mr R Gould As before 205 Mrs Wh
Page 133 and 134:
251 Mr B Guyett - Chairman No, you
Page 135 and 136:
301 Ms K Kelly 4.9 Good design and
Page 137 and 138:
359 Mr New The district is short of
Page 139 and 140:
Rep No Contact Name Energy & Water
Page 141 and 142:
046 Mr & Mrs J Cripps See 1.0 - why
Page 143 and 144:
093 Mrs M J Owoo I think you are do
Page 145 and 146:
140 Mrs J Davies If you are referin
Page 147 and 148:
181 Mrs M R Hutchings What do you m
Page 149 and 150:
224 Mr K S Gee Water - there are se
Page 151 and 152:
263 Mr P Kneen Whilst Swan Hill ack
Page 153 and 154:
307 Mr J Snow Extra development mea
Page 155 and 156:
7. LEISURE, TOURISM & COMMUNITY FAC
Page 157 and 158:
027 Mr B Fuller Leisure facilities
Page 159 and 160:
069 Mrs B Buckland 070 P Robertson
Page 161 and 162:
112 A J Smythe Green Burial sites -
Page 163 and 164:
156 J W Collins Rochford does not n
Page 165 and 166:
190 Mr G J Tinsey New facilities sh
Page 167 and 168:
235 L W Lewis There are not enough
Page 169 and 170:
268 Mr S Crussell We don't really h
Page 171 and 172:
317 Mr D Harris Having attended a '
Page 173 and 174:
359 Mr New I do not see this as a t
Page 175 and 176:
Rep No Contact Name CPO and Plannin
Page 177 and 178:
057 Mrs J Williams Developers shoul
Page 179 and 180:
102 Mr T Newton Compulsory purchase
Page 181 and 182:
158 Mr & Mrs White Some compulsory
Page 183 and 184:
196 Mr A E Hodges The voluntary app
Page 185 and 186:
246 Miss M Saward No this is not fa
Page 187 and 188:
306 Mr E C Cook See comments under
Page 189 and 190:
362 Ms M Power Circular 1/97 provid
show all

Planning - Summary of all comments - Amazon Web Services

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?