Planning - Summary of all comments - Amazon Web Services

332 Mr & Mrs Jones
Green belt should not be sacrosanct and under no circumstances touched, brown field sites utilised, poor quality ie along
noisy rail or road links for shops and industry to aid accessibility to transport systems and homes on land with pleasant
environments.
333 Mr & Mrs Hopkins
Larger housing sites will completely destroy the character of this area. It will end up joining one town/village to another thus
swallowing up the essential gaps that exist at the moment. We believe these houses should be fairly spread throughout the
district with added/improved schools, health facilities and shops to benefit the outlying villages as well as the larger 3 areas.
We don't have a great deal of green belt left so I don't think green belt should be an option at all. Our narrow position is
between the Thames on one side and the Crouch on the other. Our main roads west are very congested and there doesn't
seem to be any space for a bypass around Rayleigh. We live in the lowest rainfall area in Britain, so why is there a need for
so many more houses in this particular area? Is it for the residents of this area or for others coming outside this area?
Doctors and dentists are full and I expect schools are having a problem too. If you are considering agricultural areas, which
I assume is greenbelt for development, what about the farmers? Do they get a say. Probably a new town would have all
the roads, schools, doctors, shops, factories, sewerage, etc incorporated and it would probably be better for an area further
north with its own road structure that doesn't come near the A13 and A127 this end of the country but joins much further up.
334 Mrs Amey
Infilling seems a better option for this area. I am very much in agreement that new houses should have rainwater storage
Consider existing use, effect on landscape and environment plus lack of access to be considered before any green belt land
is released for housing. Lower Road Hockley might well be used for development. It must be ? That in Rochford there is
little land that appears to be of immediate use ? max. we havent had much of any brownfield or similar sites expand
347 Mr C Rooke
existing development.
Every effort should be made to preserve green belt. Much of the area is over developed and infrastructure is strained. We
are in danger of becoming an urban sprawl. Concentrate on small developments that can be absorbed without detriment to
349 Ms C Paine
the area.
350 Mr A James I believe Green Belt land should never be built on, as this was the reason it was thought up in the first place.
352 Cllr Joyce Smith Should not release land from Green Belt - it is still needed as a buffer zone.
South side of Windermere Avenue Hullbridge should be released from green belt for development for housing. It would
improve the conditions we have put up with, dust in the summer, mud and dirty water in winter making this road dangerous,
there has been 3 or 4 major accidents in the passed 2-3 years caused by speeding off the unmade roade onto the Main
353 Mr R J Saward Road.
354 Mrs Smith
By 2021 a new sensible government would have been in place making ANOTHER 4600 homes unnecessary with so many
people emigrating out of the UK, where are all these people who 'need' a home coming from? The London/Southend
corridor is over prescribed now, but a great deal of green open space is around Brentwood area and with Oldchurch and
Harold Wood Hospitals closing the vacant area would accommodate much more than 4600 new homes.