24.07.2013 Views

Planning - Summary of all comments - Amazon Web Services

Planning - Summary of all comments - Amazon Web Services

Planning - Summary of all comments - Amazon Web Services

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

252 F Harrison<br />

New Town - This may be the answer, but new towns tend to be ?less places; especi<strong>all</strong>y if high rise flats are involved.<br />

Infilling in urban areas - This is costly and time consuming and perhaps in areas undesirable. Infilling has trundled along in<br />

the past and is now becoming rarer as sites diminish. Note the present trend to demolish and rebuild. In any exent such ? ?<br />

<strong>of</strong> development would barely dent the figure <strong>of</strong> housing required. Best leave it to the private developer. Residential estates<br />

- Satelite housing could be established. They could range from sm<strong>all</strong>, say the size <strong>of</strong> the King George playing field in<br />

Rayleigh, to the large, as the Grange estate between Langdon Road and Little Wheatleys Chase <strong>of</strong>f the London Road in<br />

Rayleigh. Type <strong>of</strong> residences - could be as follows - Semi-detached houses, 1930's style perhaps with stretched 'box' room<br />

to provide reasonable sized thrid bedroom. Sm<strong>all</strong> blocks <strong>of</strong> flats, not more than two storeys to cater for people who perfer<br />

flats. Semi-detached affordable bungalos for disabled and for elderly people who cannot cope with stairs and for first-time<br />

A recycling centre is needed in or around the Rochford area. Because <strong>of</strong> the lack <strong>of</strong> this, more and more rubbish is being<br />

253 Mr M J Smith<br />

dumped at the roadside and in our beautiful estuaries.<br />

I think the whole situation is very sad. Whoever you speak to lately feels the same. I never complain or would sit and wirte<br />

my views to anyone but this is how strongly I feel. I worry about how the area is going to be when my children grow up and<br />

am always detabing moving away - as are a lot <strong>of</strong> people. I appreciate the Governemnt sets these tasks and that people<br />

are looking to move into the area but how long do you go on. We are ruining this area. Perhaps by not building people will<br />

look at other areas for employment and housing rather than encouraging people here. As I say improve our services,<br />

254 Ms V Stanesby doctors, dentists, hospitals - prove we can cope with our population then extend.<br />

255 Mr S Chilton Rochford is a great place to live and I think that radical change could potenti<strong>all</strong>y damage the place greatly.<br />

I would like to provide details <strong>of</strong> three potential sites that we are proposing for development at this early stage, and would<br />

welcome the opportunity to speak with you further about them. All three sites are located near the railway on brown field<br />

land. The sites are therefore in sustainable locations to be considered for redevelopment for residential use. The three<br />

locations as shown on the attached plans are: 1. Land at Hockley Station to the immediate north <strong>of</strong> the station on<br />

Plumberow Avenue. 2. Land at Hockley Station to the east <strong>of</strong> the station - accessed from the Station Approach. 3. A<br />

sm<strong>all</strong>er residential site <strong>of</strong>f Preston Gardens. I would request that these sites be considered for inclusion in a future site<br />

256 Ms P Butler<br />

<strong>all</strong>ocation's DPD for residential development. If you require any furhter details at this time, please contact me.<br />

I act <strong>of</strong> behalf <strong>of</strong> Mr G Marsh<strong>all</strong> who owns land to the south <strong>of</strong> Sutton Court Drive. During the Inquiry into the Replacement<br />

Local Plan, we raised concerns over the limited lifespan left in that plan, and the ability <strong>of</strong> the Council to bring forward an<br />

early review in the form <strong>of</strong> the LDF. I am happy that these concerns have been disproved, and that the Council are<br />

proceeding apace with the LDF. I know that you are familiar with my client's land, and that you have discussed a number <strong>of</strong><br />

matters with him. I will not therefore dwell on site specific matters, although as you know it is very close to shops, services<br />

and employment, notably those close to the airport. In particular, it is well related to public service provision including the<br />

new airport railway station opposite. The <strong>all</strong>ocation and development <strong>of</strong> the site would secure affordable housing provision,<br />

together with other potential benefits such as new pedestrian and cycle links; open space; and traffic calming etc. The<br />

257 Mr T Dodkins<br />

questionnaire into the Core Strategy asks a number <strong>of</strong> questions relating to specific issues, which we have addressed

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!