Planning - Summary of all comments - Amazon Web Services
Planning - Summary of all comments - Amazon Web Services
Planning - Summary of all comments - Amazon Web Services
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
308 The Occupier<br />
How can we think <strong>of</strong> a further quantity <strong>of</strong> housing without providing an answer to the grid locking <strong>of</strong> Rayleigh, at certain<br />
times it can already take over half an hour from High Street to the A127. If we need new houses, we need new roads and<br />
infrastructures to cope. Without further roads and shops, huoses will make life miserable for <strong>all</strong>, creating hostility and<br />
aggression. With <strong>all</strong> the building <strong>of</strong> homes in London Road and Rawreth Lane there is a desperate need for a supermarket<br />
in that area. You cannot be so naive as to think that people living there will shop in the High Street! If they do, where will<br />
they park in an already overcrowded parking lot?<br />
No more green belt should be released and certainly we do not need a new town another defacement <strong>of</strong> the green<br />
309 Mr J Smith<br />
landscape.<br />
Land should not be released from the Green Belt. We should not be continuing to develop around this area. It is already<br />
over developed and the council should be asking the Government to look elsewhere in the country. I think we have more<br />
than enough new towns in this area too. This part <strong>of</strong> Essex seems to be getting destroyed by developers who are only<br />
concentrating on making money more than being realistic about how the roads and infrastructure can take it and impact on<br />
310 Chris Teeder<br />
environment.<br />
Land should be released at Rayleigh end <strong>of</strong> Bull Lane, it is close to shopping centre and schools '60 homes' can be built<br />
here. Not so keen on new towns, which take a lot <strong>of</strong> green belt away. Many new flats already created and on increase from<br />
311 Mrs P A Watson Jones property which were origin<strong>all</strong>y business use ie garages.<br />
I think the Green Belt should remain GREEN and housing should be restircted. I do not think the sm<strong>all</strong>er towns/villages<br />
should be over developed as this will spoil their character. If an increase in housing is necessary then it should try to be<br />
developed within the land available within the area but not by building large estates. Rayleigh is increasingly getting bigger<br />
and with it there is an increase in problems such as crime and traffic congestion and it will soon lose its appeal if large scale<br />
housing is implemented. I do not think a new town is a good idea either - taking Basildon as an example it is not exactly an<br />
'up and coming area' and one <strong>of</strong> the reasons for this is because they built large estates <strong>of</strong> cheap housing which seem to<br />
come hand in hand with social problems. Let areas where it is possible to implement extra housing without spoiling the<br />
character <strong>of</strong> the place take it on board and not try to over develop the sm<strong>all</strong> towns and villages in the area. If there is not<br />
312 Mr D Foyle<br />
enough land to implement the increase in housing expected then we should turn around and say NO! There must be plenty<br />
313 Mr B Sellwood Housing Probable Option (p25) : This option is supported.<br />
There should be more infill to housing while in-between there is green belt land. Top end <strong>of</strong> Rayleigh Avenue, where large<br />
houses are built, inbetween, is sm<strong>all</strong> pieces <strong>of</strong> green belt land these could be used for affordable housing, pieces <strong>of</strong> green<br />
belt land in Disraeli Road <strong>of</strong>f Rayleigh Avenue could be built on with affordable houses through to Grove Road. Sm<strong>all</strong>er<br />
314 Mrs C Quennell houses should be built and get young people on the property market.<br />
Green belt land should not be released. No new town is necessary, <strong>all</strong> effort should focus on the Thames Gateway. There<br />
has already been too much development without the corresponding infrastructure. There has been too much development<br />
315 R A Stone<br />
<strong>of</strong> the flood plain.<br />
Use existing infrastructure in and around Hawkwell eg Ironwell Lane Nursery, Glebelands Nursery and Widows Nursery<br />
(Ivanhoe) therefore not spoiling the countryside end <strong>of</strong> Ironwell Lane but using existing main drainage and gas supply or a<br />
316 Ms S Copeman similar location with these facilities accessible.<br />
317 Mr D Harris I think it is best to <strong>all</strong>ow the existing towns to grow.<br />
Brown belt land should be used there seem to be old industrial sites (eye sores) like the one next to the new housing down<br />
Rawreth Road that need clearing and starting again (housing would be a good option and the industrial units could easily be<br />
318 Ms W Hatton<br />
relocated to <strong>all</strong> these areas with for let signs.