Planning - Summary of all comments - Amazon Web Services

More documents

Recommendations

Info

026 Mr A Lantaff I am not a supoprter of compulsory purchase orders. Developers will have to make financial contributions towards improvements as they are bound to be making large profits from these developments that are being forced on the area. 027 Mr B Fuller We should not allow too many properties to be crammed into small space. Developers should make more contribution to landscaping and also after care. More thought for parking, and ensuring enough parking as what is opint of building new estates where car owners end up parking on pavement? Compulsory 029 Mr White purchase and planning obligations I do not know enought about to comments. I do feel that the cost of road improvements to new development is a cost which can only be pased on to the purchasers of 030 Mr H May new property. This is not right, but I see no real alternative. Developers should make a contribution depending on size and type of development. If part of a larger development plan 031 A R Wetton then yes a contribution should be made. Depends on where it is compulsory purchase? Every developer should be asked to make a financial contribution if they 032 J Morley want to buy land for development. 034 Mr Hart Building by property speculators should carry maximum financial penalty. 035 Mr B Deal Use it wisely and save unlike the destruction of the Doctor's house in Hawkwell. 036 Mrs P Slade Should not be allowed. 037 Mr A Bawden Compulsory purchase is criminal, it cannot be right to take land and homes from people if they are not willing to give it up! Compulsory purchase is not nice but sometimes required. Where a building or land ha been left to deteriorate then I would say the Council would be right to purchase. If a builder puts two houses where there was one before then he should pay a 038 Mr J Wright levy of say 50% which would offset the Councils extra work in supplying waste, policing etc. Developers should make a proportionate contribution to infrastructure improvements (road, car parking, education, cultural facilities etc) but they should not be "taxed" beyond the legitimate additional demand their development will place on existing facilities. Also, I am suspicious of the government's proposed to replace Section 106 agreements, negotiated locally, with a 'planning gain supplement' redistributed on a regional basis. The present system should be retained, any 040 Mr D Huskisson abuse by local authorities prevented, and the obligations of developers enforced. 043 Mr M Yorke Wade Preserve woodlands. Not to grant high rise flats over 5 stories Yes. Developers should be asked to contribute a lot more or reduce house prices which bear no relation to the cost of 045 Mr R Abbott construction! Proves the point (compulsory purchase) - we do not have the room for mass build/development, why should hard- 046 Mr & Mrs J Cripps working/tax paying people be penalized for an incompetent decision to develop an over-crowded area? 048 Mr S Reeves No it's not. It's not necessary to compulsory purchase, go elsewhere 049 Mr & Mrs Kitchen Yes. It is a reasonable approach but developers should make a conspicuous contribution No. Planning people, should ensure that no business is carried out on residential property. Clear eyesores from (above) such as large lorries, caravans etc from front gardens and local streets. Ensure all new estates have plenty of off road 051 Mrs D Langdon parking. Previously, in other areas, bribery and corruption have been found with regard to building plots/sites. We must ensure fair 052 Mr & Mrs D Lench play, and a fair balance in the type of dwellings. 053 E Winn Get developers to work in unison with the public Compulsory purchase should only be used as a last resort - rely on market forces. Any burden put on developers will only 054 Mr & Mrs Todman be passed onto the purchasers to fill an increase in home prices. 055 Mr V Hawtree Compulsory purchase Foulness and build a wind farm and Country Park.
057 Mrs J Williams Developers should make a contribution to the local infrastructure. C.P.O's essential in extreme case. Whilst the old development land tax was a good scheme, planning gain is still covered 058 M J Jackson by capital gains tax. 059 Garfield No. New council houses would help youngsters, but it doesn't help them get a foot on the property ladder Unless absolutely necessary compulsory purchase should only be a last resort. Developers should be paying more I cite the 060 Mr S J Herbert Park School sale as an example. 061 Mr G W Slaughter Leave it as it is Where there are derelict sites/unused sites etc compulsory purchase is a good way of avoiding wasted space. Developers should be encouraged to take these on with planning incentives. Requiring infrastructure improvements to be provided by developers is logical. Big developers should require developers to finance road widening and repairs if access could be an issue once in operation. The maintenance of existing buildings should be obligatory to avoid unsightly areas. Council tax 062 Chris Taylor premium could be charged for failure to maintain standards of maintenance. 063 Mr B A Stammers Compulsory purchase would work ok if it was value and 20% it would save time and money in the long run. Yes developers should make contributions to local amenities and the infrastructure. Al new estates should have provision 064 Mrs S Smith for schools, surgeries and a focal point and meeting place for the new local population. All considerations and approaches should be examined from the point of view of general advantage rather than the 065 Mr T Bennett individual. The basic responsibility of authority is to provide and sanction what is obviously best for the majority! Compulsory purchase should be a last resort measure and developers should be asked to contribute and be restricted into 066 Mr G Langhorn building like for like. The possible main problem here to national government rules which has led local councils to delay decisions. I am sure it is right to obtain all ? Land financial contributions from developers and not easily at the initial stage of any development but on a continuing basis to upkeep of roads and property. All on site requirements, roads, sewers, paths, lighting should be 067 J D Carr instralled prior to any building being commenced. Compulsory purchase to move someone out of their home for a developer or road is obscene. Developers have done very 068 Mr & Mrs McDermott nicely over the years by making very token payments. Difficult to have a hard and fast rule as there are always so many points to consider when planning if a compulsory purchase is involved. Long term needs/effects should possibly be the deciding factor. Developers must make substantial 069 Mrs B Buckland financial contributions but this should never be the decivding factor in a planning decision. Developers exist to make money and do not regard the feelings or objections of local people as important. Therefore, 070 P Robertson developers do need to be effectively controlled. 071 P Williams No. Indepth investigation on developemnt against it effect on the local community should be carried out first. Yes in the right situation. Developers should contribute towards infrastructure - roads etc. Estate development to include 072 Mr & Mrs S J Painter community centre/shops. Rawreth Lane is bereft. 073 Mr S Learmouth Unable to answer 074 Mr & Mrs Raddon Don't believe in compulsory purchase. My daughter lives in Gardiners Lane (that has now had a stop on it). Compulsory purchase should only be used for infrastructure benefits for the community with affected persons being fully 075 Mr K A Cooke compensated. Of course developers should have to pay for any resultant effects from their developments. Any developers should have to provide energy efficient homes, considering, sewage, water, power and roads. Large builders should not be able to strain our resources and infrastructure further leaving local residents to foot the bill and suffer 076 Ms G Lunn the aftermath.
Page 1 and 2:
ROCHFORD DISTRICT LOCAL DEVELOPMENT
Page 3 and 4:
Rep No Contact Name General comment
Page 5 and 6:
024 Mr P Williams 025 Mrs P Clifton
Page 7 and 8:
050 Mrs J Samuels 051 Mrs D Langdon
Page 9 and 10:
069 Mrs B Buckland 070 P Robertson
Page 11 and 12:
091 Ms P Bailey 092 Mrs M Hills 095
Page 13 and 14:
121 Mrs S J Attfield 122 F E Wells
Page 15 and 16:
144 Mr C Bambury 145 Mr A Lysons 14
Page 17 and 18:
159 Mr & Mrs J Collins I do not hav
Page 19 and 20:
177 Mr J East 178 Mr D Livermore 17
Page 21 and 22:
198 Mr J Clamp 200 Mr T O'Shea 201
Page 23 and 24:
222 R Luck 225 Mr P Court 227 Mr &
Page 25 and 26:
246 Miss M Saward 248 Mr A Presslee
Page 27 and 28:
259 Mr M B Rogers 260 Mr & Mrs Will
Page 29 and 30:
272 Mr A Patton 273 Mr J Wilson 274
Page 31 and 32:
300 Mrs Upson I have answered this
Page 33 and 34:
322 Ms J Hitchcock 323 Mr T Beebee
Page 35 and 36:
338 Mr & Mrs Saunders We have been
Page 37 and 38:
357 Ms V O'Malley Perhaps the gover
Page 39 and 40:
1. HOUSING Where should land be rel
Page 41 and 42:
014 D Hanrahan I do not agree furth
Page 43 and 44:
040 Mr D Huskisson The Ashingdon Ro
Page 45 and 46:
070 P Robertson Rayleigh and the su
Page 47 and 48:
102 Mr T Newton Firstly why are you
Page 49 and 50:
130 Mrs S Martin 131 Mel Bennett 13
Page 51 and 52:
160 Ms S Barnes No green belt shoul
Page 53 and 54:
189 Mr G Gooding 190 Mr G J Tinsey
Page 55 and 56:
215 Mr T R Thompson 216 Mr & Mrs D
Page 57 and 58:
237 Mr Sanders We should not be rel
Page 59 and 60:
263 Mr P Kneen 264 Mr K Coleman 265
Page 61 and 62:
286 Mr L F Knight No more housing w
Page 63 and 64:
319 Mr M Lang Not down in this corn
Page 65 and 66:
355 Mr K Vingoe 356 Mr & Mrs D Dobb
Page 67 and 68:
2. AFFORDABLE HOUSING Have we got t
Page 69 and 70:
Mr R Huckett & Ms C Mobbs Affordabl
Page 71 and 72:
065 Mr T Bennett Affordable (truly
Page 73 and 74:
104 B Aspinall In my opinion the cu
Page 75 and 76:
145 Mr A Lysons There is no wy I ca
Page 77 and 78:
180 Mr R Swain Local jobs are usual
Page 79 and 80:
213 Mr M Wheeler 215 Mr T R Thompso
Page 81 and 82:
251 Mr B Guyett - Chairman We agree
Page 83 and 84:
287 Mr R Forster Cannot comment as
Page 85 and 86:
327 Mrs C Taylor 329 Mrs M J Snowdo
Page 87 and 88:
3. JOBS Where can we find land for
Page 89 and 90:
021 Mr P Jermyn There is enough spa
Page 91 and 92:
063 Mr B A Stammers Broardband mean
Page 93 and 94:
113 Mr & Mrs Rowland Apprentaships
Page 95 and 96:
158 Mr & Mrs White 159 Mr & Mrs J C
Page 97 and 98:
193 Ms S Swift Should be on sites v
Page 99 and 100:
236 Mr & Mrs Beattie Transport link
Page 101 and 102:
274 Mr S Mckinnon Employment where
Page 103 and 104:
321 R J Feather How will the jobs b
Page 105 and 106:
4. PROTECTION Are there any other a
Page 107 and 108:
026 Mr A Lantaff As stated earlier
Page 109 and 110:
073 Mr S Learmouth I believe strong
Page 111 and 112:
136 Mrs G E Chase Protect our areas
Page 113 and 114:
178 Mr D Livermore Protect all of t
Page 115 and 116:
228 Ms A Henderson I think the coun
Page 117 and 118:
261 S A Skinner 262 Ms L Parish I w
Page 119 and 120:
301 Ms K Kelly 4.3 Protection and e
Page 121 and 122:
354 Mrs Smith This side of the rive
Page 123 and 124:
Rep No Contact Name Character Comme
Page 125 and 126: 052 Mr & Mrs D Lench Too many expen
Page 127 and 128: 106 Ms P Melito Rochford should alw
Page 129 and 130: 166 G W Fleming All aeras must be m
Page 131 and 132: 204 Mr R Gould As before 205 Mrs Wh
Page 133 and 134: 251 Mr B Guyett - Chairman No, you
Page 135 and 136: 301 Ms K Kelly 4.9 Good design and
Page 137 and 138: 359 Mr New The district is short of
Page 139 and 140: Rep No Contact Name Energy & Water
Page 141 and 142: 046 Mr & Mrs J Cripps See 1.0 - why
Page 143 and 144: 093 Mrs M J Owoo I think you are do
Page 145 and 146: 140 Mrs J Davies If you are referin
Page 147 and 148: 181 Mrs M R Hutchings What do you m
Page 149 and 150: 224 Mr K S Gee Water - there are se
Page 151 and 152: 263 Mr P Kneen Whilst Swan Hill ack
Page 153 and 154: 307 Mr J Snow Extra development mea
Page 155 and 156: 7. LEISURE, TOURISM & COMMUNITY FAC
Page 157 and 158: 027 Mr B Fuller Leisure facilities
Page 159 and 160: 069 Mrs B Buckland 070 P Robertson
Page 161 and 162: 112 A J Smythe Green Burial sites -
Page 163 and 164: 156 J W Collins Rochford does not n
Page 165 and 166: 190 Mr G J Tinsey New facilities sh
Page 167 and 168: 235 L W Lewis There are not enough
Page 169 and 170: 268 Mr S Crussell We don't really h
Page 171 and 172: 317 Mr D Harris Having attended a '
Page 173 and 174: 359 Mr New I do not see this as a t
Page 175: Rep No Contact Name CPO and Plannin
Page 179 and 180: 102 Mr T Newton Compulsory purchase
Page 181 and 182: 158 Mr & Mrs White Some compulsory
Page 183 and 184: 196 Mr A E Hodges The voluntary app
Page 185 and 186: 246 Miss M Saward No this is not fa
Page 187 and 188: 306 Mr E C Cook See comments under
Page 189 and 190: 362 Ms M Power Circular 1/97 provid
show all

Planning - Summary of all comments - Amazon Web Services

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?