Planning - Summary of all comments - Amazon Web Services

102 Mr T Newton
Firstly why are you suggesting a new town? Have we a housing problem? Why encourage Londoners to cheaper housing,
moving here to clog the inadequate road system whilst trying to travel back to London to work. You cannot release any
more green belt than you have in previous years, with the density or building plans being passed by the council planning
department. I have watched too many small bungalows with land demolished to build five or six houses with four or five
bedrooms with eventually 3 or 4 cars per house.
103 Miss B Dickinson The above question should read 'should land be released from the green belt' and the answer is simply 'no not at all, ever'
No more building on Green Belt should be considered. Unless improvements to roadways are made - more house building
104 B Aspinall
is ludicrous. Land for a "New Town" what a joke.
None. Ashingdon Road is too busy with traffic now. Hospital and doctors have too mnay patients any new homes should be
105 Mr R J Aldridge built in Surrey, they can afford them.
No to further development around Rochford/Ashingdon Hawkwell. Roads are congested, no further schools are planned,
106 Ms P Melito
not to my knowledge. The youth need facilities such as skate/ice rinks, bike parks etc. to keep them off the streets.
No land should be released from the Green Belt - there is ample brown belt sites that should be utilised thus also clearing
107 Mr P S Reid
eyesores. Development is a continuing process - we would not have what we have today without it.
Land south of Poynters Lane Great Wakering. Land south end of Anne Boleyn estate numbers of infill sites, single
108 Mr W J Edgar
dwellings. How can a plot between existing houses contribute to the Green Belt?
Further development in Rochford, Ashingdon, Hockley, Hawkwell and Rayleigh Wakering should be stopped as it is
109 Mr C Fantides
destroying the environment.
110 Mr P Nippard None should be released. No new town. If there are no other options then say no growth is possible
If you have enough land to build a new town, and the infrastructure is in place and it doesn't! It is a strain on existing
resources. The roads locally A13 127 are chaotic now. So any extra would be crazy using brownfield areas could be
considered for some housnig perhaps small towns/village type communties not some new Basildon it has a lot to do with
111 Mr & Mrs Curtis what is available and what is feasable.
The figure of 4,600 houses required by the government is completely ridiculous, it is in line with the insane policy of Prescott
to cover the south east with concrete. It is quite obvious that the supporting infrastructure (additional services, such as
water, sewage facilities, schools, hospital beds, etc ) does not and will not exist. Local councils must oppose this. NO
GREEN BELT LAND SHOULD EVER BE GIVEN UP. The "green belt" has already been eroded, chipped away bit by bit in
112 A J Smythe
the hope that no-one would notice, since the war. It must remain sacrosanct, as was the original intention.
Specialised housing for disabled people and supported living housing should be built - even if this means some green belt
113 Mr & Mrs Rowland has to go. Residential cottages for those with severe learning difficulties need to be created.
114 Mr & Mrs F Blake
Rochford & Rayleigh are at saturation point - we don't have the infrastructure to support any further housing and certainly
not a new town. Our sewerage can take no more. Only a short while ago we suffered drainage back up. Our power would
cut off suddenly leaving us in the dark without heat. Our schools are full our roads too. Our hospital is full to brimming.
115 Mr W J Wharnsby I think major roads are firsts before building more houses.
Before any further land is released every effort should be made to use brownfield sites and existing properties that are
standing empty. NO further development in Rochford/Ashingdon. If there is no alternative to releasing new land then it
116 R S Barton
should be as far to the west as possible, so as to reduce traffic flows through already congested roads.