Planning - Summary of all comments - Amazon Web Services
Planning - Summary of all comments - Amazon Web Services
Planning - Summary of all comments - Amazon Web Services
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
190 Mr G J Tinsey<br />
New facilities should be constructed close to new homes, so car use is not needed. Any leisure buildings, play-grounds and<br />
so on must be CCTV protected and closed at night, if for use by only young children. Youth facilities are required.<br />
Expand existing airport. Improve and develop bike paths (not just a line on aldrady narrow roads). Arts house cinema -<br />
much needed. More clubs young people to avoid delinquancy, local bike/skate boarding etc within communities - not out <strong>of</strong><br />
towns. River Crouch - develop paths for walking and cycling between South Woodham Ferrers to Hullbridge and<br />
191 Janice & Alex Brining Paglesham.<br />
Southend is ripe for more tourism/leisure facilities. Any money spent promoting this will pay back dividens both for the<br />
192 Ms B Mean<br />
existing local people and for tourists.<br />
193 Ms S Swift Swimming pool (see 4)<br />
I can see tourism within Southend-on-sea, but what would a tourist want to visit Rochford. We have nothing to attract them.<br />
195 Mr B M Gilbert<br />
Maybe a few more hotels or the like to satisfy a dormitory need for the Southend airport when it develops.<br />
196 Mr A E Hodges Visitor centre for Hockley Woods showing woodland management/flora and forna - tearooms?<br />
197 P McAllister Would not want tourism developed in these areas not suitable sites for it. Too much road congestion. No to incinerators.<br />
To encourage tourism - council areas would need to work closer together to avoid duplication - a sm<strong>all</strong> <strong>of</strong>fice in town centres<br />
198 Mr J Clamp<br />
would make the facility more accessible.<br />
199 Mr & Mrs Crockford Tourism is not re<strong>all</strong>y a good idea, with the two roads we have into this corner congestion would be worse than it already is.<br />
Not sure why we need tourism - we have little to <strong>of</strong>fer? Leisure - most if not <strong>all</strong> privately owned and expensive community -<br />
not impressed. Is the new pavillion in St Georges just for the bowling club - are the toilets to be opened to the public. If not<br />
200 Mr T O'Shea<br />
why was it built? Can more be done for the teenagers? Where can they go?<br />
More swimming pools for local people and not out <strong>of</strong> area clubs which consume most <strong>of</strong> pools and pool areas during times<br />
when normal working people are able to utilise these facilities. Clubs and out <strong>of</strong> area clubs consume our local facilities.<br />
201 Mr M Thomas<br />
This is a major deterant to get fit.<br />
More local youth clubs should be provided in local areas ie the centre <strong>of</strong> town/village etc. Not the expensive members only<br />
203 M T Conaty<br />
health centre we already have sufficient within the area.<br />
204 Mr R Gould The facilities are adequate albeit more should be done for teenagers - Rochford.<br />
Why not a swimming pool, being elderly it is the only sport I am capable <strong>of</strong> doing, not just me but others also. You have<br />
205 Mrs Whitham<br />
catered for youngsters, middle aged but not us. I rest my case.<br />
More leisure facilities would go under used and be a drain on rescources. Tourism is unlikely to make our district a large<br />
206 Mrs G Harper<br />
income. Many <strong>of</strong> our skilled residents work in London.<br />
208 I Gyres Swimming pool in Rayleigh<br />
210 Mrs M A King Don't you think we have enough traffic problems and parking problems in Rayleigh without encouraging more tourism!<br />
Clearly the Southend Seafront is the main area for tourism. However, the existing leisure facilities the arcades are in<br />
excess. There ought to be seafront cafes, and bars to encourage more families to use them as opposed to the many pubs<br />
which do not encuorage the tourism family clientel. The pier must be reinstated in full, and also the land slipped area west<br />
211 Mr B W Williams <strong>of</strong> the pier, again to include a bandstand, which could also be used as an open arena for use by stage acting.<br />
I think the first thing we need in Rochford District is a country park which would be a nice day out for families and would be<br />
a pleasant place in the area. It should be positioned in the North <strong>of</strong> the district near Hullbridge. I think a hotel is also<br />
needed as the only local ones are the Chichester and Renouf. These are only sm<strong>all</strong> hotels and to boost tourism we need<br />
212 Master J Richards larger ones.<br />
213 Mr M Wheeler We need a swimming pool in the Rayleigh/Hullbridge area.