Planning - Summary of all comments - Amazon Web Services

More documents

Recommendations

Info

133 The Occupier The District is evedently well served with sport leisure facilities, but many of the facilities available are unaffordable to about 50% of the population. Local tourism development depends on local entrepreneurs being brought on board from the onset. 134 Ms Innes A decent shopping centre in southend. (b) More transport. (c) No. (d) Clean up the areas tourists are likely to visit. Development of tourism is right, but with the development we have already planned and continually new development under 135 Mr C Blundell the heading of tourism, for what reason should they be interested in Rochford. 136 Mrs G E Chase Somewhere for the youngsters to meet. The state of Southend at present is the last place anyone would visit for pleasure. 137 Mr & Mrs Acres I believe you have leisure, tourism and community facilities right. No swimming pool that is accessible by public transport. Why not a swimming pool in Rayleigh. New sports centre in 138 The Occupier Rawreth Lane - served by 1 bus that runs half hourly. 139 Ms A Clark Purpose built facilities for teenagers - small scale, local to housing areas, supervised and safe. Again more for the younger teenager - youth centres with people who can advise on problems they are having - councilling 140 Mrs J Davies etc. I think the rest is quite good. We agree with the idea of developing green tourism throughout the district. We see there is a lack of appropriate facilities for local youth in Hockley, Ashingdon and Hawkwell - which loads to other community problems. Has anyone asked the local young people what facilities they would like to have in their area? Improved local shopping areas in Hockley, 141 Mr & Mrs Sarchet Hawkwell and Ashingdon - to create a 'core'. A good supermarket in Rochford. Better bus services. Decent hotel(s). More chain restaurants - eg Pizza Express - rather than always having to go to Southend. A more upmarket Tuesday market to relect local produce and market town history of 142 D Tilley/R Bhandari Rochford. Move Rochford upmarket in terms of businesses present. How about a set of stocks in every village, then anyone cuasing acts of vanadlism, paint spraying and other crimes could spend 2 hours in there and we could all throw rotten veg and fruit at them. This should cure them and people would come 143 J E Burfield to watch. Two birds with one stone. 145 Mr A Lysons There is lots to do here, don't forget wildlife, it needs somewhere too. Places for kids to play and burn off all the blubber. 146 A C Barton To find alternatives for evening meeting for young people, not costing a lot, in town centre, preferably. 147 Mr I Randall Airport extension sounds exciting and will bring new jobs and opportunities. With the exception of our Tudor history I cannot see how tourism can be generated unless "tacky" attractions are put in place! Sorry to say "we are not the Cotswolds" etc. 150 Ms N Saunders Leisure etc facilities are fine. Need to make sure there is plenty of public transport so people can use them! I don't think Tourism is an issue but I do think it is necessary for local people to have country parks and leisure facilities (eg 152 Mr S Crowther sports/water centres) I would be in favour of using Green belt land for these and similar social purposes. 153 Mrs S Bradshaw 155 Ms A Boulter Facilities needed in the area should include the premotion of local shops, and local products. There appear to be enough leisure facilities for the area. Development for green tourism should make use of the green belt areas for walking and studying nature (nature reserves etc) any development needed for this should be in keeping with the environment. Rochford is labelled as a "historic" town - we need a heritage centre with informatino for vistors. We have perhaps the most important ship on our doorstep (ie H.M.S. Beagle) - scientifically of great interest around the world. Why not make use of this - it would bring tourists and money into the area. An excellent example of a small heritage centre is at Witham, in the High Street.
156 J W Collins Rochford does not need more tourist facilities - it is unlikely to be a major tourist destination anyway. Emphasis must be on leisure facilities for all ages. Shopping facilities need improving already Rayleigh is becoming one big collection of charity shops and Estate agents. A wider variety of retailers is needed in order to fight back against lakeside and so on. Shops must be for local needs, and parking cheaper or free. If we increase our protected countryside areas, this will encourage folk into these places. Thereby benefitting health - channelling children's energies positively and providing income for pubs and local shops. Get advice and participation from 158 Mr & Mrs White Essex Wildlife, RSPB and RHS. Somewhere for the 11-18 year olds to go, doing what interests them. Music, computer games, bowling, café's where they can meet friends and chat. This would also get them off the streets, out of King George's Park, hence less policing of the 159 Mr & Mrs J Collins area. They (the police) could then concentrate on doing something useful, catching criminals. The River Crouch could become a much better tourist attraction. If you look at the waterway around Papermill lock - the 160 Ms S Barnes crouch could be this good. At this present time I think these issues are well catered for - there are more important issues as discussed in this 161 Mr S J Benee document. 162 Mr & Mrs Livens Community facilities are all important. Do we have a local museum? How many tourists come to Rochford District. In my opinion we definitely need a new swimming pool in the Rayleigh area. I feel Park School site would have been ideal, but unfortunately I believe that this was a golden opportunity missed. Not only the local residents but also local schools 163 Mr S T Cardwell could benefit from a quality swimming pool. 164 Mr I King More facilities are required in central Rayleigh (the highest populated area). Who would want to tour round here? Every town has it's quotes of foul-mouthed yobs, and we hear constant complaints 165 Mr G Searles from visitors regarding no toilets. 166 G W Fleming Leisure good, by other areas. Tourism? Comm - streets etc could be cleaner. 167 Mrs J Marshall What tourism exists in Rochford? What leisure exists in Rochford. We have the facilities we need, I don't think we are short of any leisure facilities and as we are not a tourist area, we do not need anything extra. What is needed is the facilities we have being looked after and reasonably priced. The Mill Hall is a 168 Ms L Young disgrace and expensive. Clements Hall changing area is also disgusting. Make more of our water fronts. It would be nice to see some leisure provision at the old Stambridge Mill site. Encourage some house owners to provide good B& B facilities - don't tie them up in red tape. More facilities are needed for teenagers - facilities that they want and would use. Make more of Rochford Resevoir site - some nice gates would improve it. Encourage local art/music/historic groups. There seem to be many restrictions that make it difficult for them to prosper. Cost of any exhibition site/hall is too high for any amateur groups. Facilities for storage for them would also help eg unused 169 Mr & Mrs Garlick garages. We could do with more accommodation for visitors such as B&B/Holiday cottages to ? Visitors for activities such as those at 4. Above. We must also market Southend, Leigh and Rochford as a where to provide a variety of activities to encourage different types of visitors on short term breaks. Essex County Council could promote Rochford area - not just the 'Old 170 Mr & Mrs Gibson House' which is open for only half a day a week. Developing the airport for tourism not only creates jobs but will reduce the traffic that uses the roads at present eg holiday ? Will not need to get to other London airports. Business travel - like ? See 3 re Hotels water based recreation such as bird 171 Ms K Meiklejohn sanctuary would suit the riverside areas.
Page 1 and 2:
ROCHFORD DISTRICT LOCAL DEVELOPMENT
Page 3 and 4:
Rep No Contact Name General comment
Page 5 and 6:
024 Mr P Williams 025 Mrs P Clifton
Page 7 and 8:
050 Mrs J Samuels 051 Mrs D Langdon
Page 9 and 10:
069 Mrs B Buckland 070 P Robertson
Page 11 and 12:
091 Ms P Bailey 092 Mrs M Hills 095
Page 13 and 14:
121 Mrs S J Attfield 122 F E Wells
Page 15 and 16:
144 Mr C Bambury 145 Mr A Lysons 14
Page 17 and 18:
159 Mr & Mrs J Collins I do not hav
Page 19 and 20:
177 Mr J East 178 Mr D Livermore 17
Page 21 and 22:
198 Mr J Clamp 200 Mr T O'Shea 201
Page 23 and 24:
222 R Luck 225 Mr P Court 227 Mr &
Page 25 and 26:
246 Miss M Saward 248 Mr A Presslee
Page 27 and 28:
259 Mr M B Rogers 260 Mr & Mrs Will
Page 29 and 30:
272 Mr A Patton 273 Mr J Wilson 274
Page 31 and 32:
300 Mrs Upson I have answered this
Page 33 and 34:
322 Ms J Hitchcock 323 Mr T Beebee
Page 35 and 36:
338 Mr & Mrs Saunders We have been
Page 37 and 38:
357 Ms V O'Malley Perhaps the gover
Page 39 and 40:
1. HOUSING Where should land be rel
Page 41 and 42:
014 D Hanrahan I do not agree furth
Page 43 and 44:
040 Mr D Huskisson The Ashingdon Ro
Page 45 and 46:
070 P Robertson Rayleigh and the su
Page 47 and 48:
102 Mr T Newton Firstly why are you
Page 49 and 50:
130 Mrs S Martin 131 Mel Bennett 13
Page 51 and 52:
160 Ms S Barnes No green belt shoul
Page 53 and 54:
189 Mr G Gooding 190 Mr G J Tinsey
Page 55 and 56:
215 Mr T R Thompson 216 Mr & Mrs D
Page 57 and 58:
237 Mr Sanders We should not be rel
Page 59 and 60:
263 Mr P Kneen 264 Mr K Coleman 265
Page 61 and 62:
286 Mr L F Knight No more housing w
Page 63 and 64:
319 Mr M Lang Not down in this corn
Page 65 and 66:
355 Mr K Vingoe 356 Mr & Mrs D Dobb
Page 67 and 68:
2. AFFORDABLE HOUSING Have we got t
Page 69 and 70:
Mr R Huckett & Ms C Mobbs Affordabl
Page 71 and 72:
065 Mr T Bennett Affordable (truly
Page 73 and 74:
104 B Aspinall In my opinion the cu
Page 75 and 76:
145 Mr A Lysons There is no wy I ca
Page 77 and 78:
180 Mr R Swain Local jobs are usual
Page 79 and 80:
213 Mr M Wheeler 215 Mr T R Thompso
Page 81 and 82:
251 Mr B Guyett - Chairman We agree
Page 83 and 84:
287 Mr R Forster Cannot comment as
Page 85 and 86:
327 Mrs C Taylor 329 Mrs M J Snowdo
Page 87 and 88:
3. JOBS Where can we find land for
Page 89 and 90:
021 Mr P Jermyn There is enough spa
Page 91 and 92:
063 Mr B A Stammers Broardband mean
Page 93 and 94:
113 Mr & Mrs Rowland Apprentaships
Page 95 and 96:
158 Mr & Mrs White 159 Mr & Mrs J C
Page 97 and 98:
193 Ms S Swift Should be on sites v
Page 99 and 100:
236 Mr & Mrs Beattie Transport link
Page 101 and 102:
274 Mr S Mckinnon Employment where
Page 103 and 104:
321 R J Feather How will the jobs b
Page 105 and 106:
4. PROTECTION Are there any other a
Page 107 and 108:
026 Mr A Lantaff As stated earlier
Page 109 and 110:
073 Mr S Learmouth I believe strong
Page 111 and 112: 136 Mrs G E Chase Protect our areas
Page 113 and 114: 178 Mr D Livermore Protect all of t
Page 115 and 116: 228 Ms A Henderson I think the coun
Page 117 and 118: 261 S A Skinner 262 Ms L Parish I w
Page 119 and 120: 301 Ms K Kelly 4.3 Protection and e
Page 121 and 122: 354 Mrs Smith This side of the rive
Page 123 and 124: Rep No Contact Name Character Comme
Page 125 and 126: 052 Mr & Mrs D Lench Too many expen
Page 127 and 128: 106 Ms P Melito Rochford should alw
Page 129 and 130: 166 G W Fleming All aeras must be m
Page 131 and 132: 204 Mr R Gould As before 205 Mrs Wh
Page 133 and 134: 251 Mr B Guyett - Chairman No, you
Page 135 and 136: 301 Ms K Kelly 4.9 Good design and
Page 137 and 138: 359 Mr New The district is short of
Page 139 and 140: Rep No Contact Name Energy & Water
Page 141 and 142: 046 Mr & Mrs J Cripps See 1.0 - why
Page 143 and 144: 093 Mrs M J Owoo I think you are do
Page 145 and 146: 140 Mrs J Davies If you are referin
Page 147 and 148: 181 Mrs M R Hutchings What do you m
Page 149 and 150: 224 Mr K S Gee Water - there are se
Page 151 and 152: 263 Mr P Kneen Whilst Swan Hill ack
Page 153 and 154: 307 Mr J Snow Extra development mea
Page 155 and 156: 7. LEISURE, TOURISM & COMMUNITY FAC
Page 157 and 158: 027 Mr B Fuller Leisure facilities
Page 159 and 160: 069 Mrs B Buckland 070 P Robertson
Page 161: 112 A J Smythe Green Burial sites -
Page 165 and 166: 190 Mr G J Tinsey New facilities sh
Page 167 and 168: 235 L W Lewis There are not enough
Page 169 and 170: 268 Mr S Crussell We don't really h
Page 171 and 172: 317 Mr D Harris Having attended a '
Page 173 and 174: 359 Mr New I do not see this as a t
Page 175 and 176: Rep No Contact Name CPO and Plannin
Page 177 and 178: 057 Mrs J Williams Developers shoul
Page 179 and 180: 102 Mr T Newton Compulsory purchase
Page 181 and 182: 158 Mr & Mrs White Some compulsory
Page 183 and 184: 196 Mr A E Hodges The voluntary app
Page 185 and 186: 246 Miss M Saward No this is not fa
Page 187 and 188: 306 Mr E C Cook See comments under
Page 189 and 190: 362 Ms M Power Circular 1/97 provid
show all

Planning - Summary of all comments - Amazon Web Services

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?