Planning - Summary of all comments - Amazon Web Services

Rep No Contact Name Housing Comments
001 Mr I Haines Ashingdon - Canewdon - Hawkwell - Stambridge
A firm stand against the use of any green belt for housing and standstill should be called on any more large scale
development. Other options are the same as private development, ie, the purchase of any sites suitable for developemnt
and quickly putting it into use. Don't sell any more council properties, if tenants wish to buy give a small grant for them to
002 Mr & Mrs Hawes move on, retain the property - upgrade it - yes, it would be money well spent.
Rochford, Ashingdon, Hockley and Hawkwell are saturated and the only road between Hockley and Rayleigh is totally
congested at peak times. Look further out - Fambridge, Stambridge, Canewdon but must have new roads, schools, doctors
003 Mr A Cooper
and most important - hospital NOT more shops
It should NOT be released. The green belt was assigned for a good reason. Rather than build on it, redevelop derilict sites
and reduce the intake of people, especially those requireing housing benefit, stealling homes from those who cannot afford
004 Mr M Cubitt
to buy. Central government should rethink.
Land alongside Cherry Orchard Lane could be developed. However, apart from this there should be no more development
in Ashingdon and Rochford unless there is serious improvement to the road structure in this area. The Governments
directive to build 4,600 houses in this area is totally unrealistic and impractical. If somewhere has to be provided for
005 Mrs P R Byres
travellers they should be charged for staying.
No!! The area is already overcrowded with barely sufficient green fields and countryside to cover existing needs. Sorry - no
comment as to other options. People with a 'second' home in our areas should be penalised. Houses not lived in
007 Ms P Pemberton permanently should be investigated
008 Ms S Woolhouse Between Little Wheatleys and Chelmsford Road
Land from green belt shouldn't be released at all and there is no where to put a new town or the necessary transport
009 Ms S Nicholls
facilities for it.
010 Mr A Devlin No, what is the point in more houses when the crrent roads, the doctors etc cannot cope with the number of people
As a Rayleigh resident since 1956 I have watched with horror the erosion of Green Belt land in this district in spite of
politicians promises to retain. Rayleigh now is becoming a dormitary town with roads approaching gridlock, electric supply
is now subject to power cuts due to excessive numbers of users, flooding is becoming more frequent due to excess of hard
surfaces - a new town in Foulness which could be increased in size by reclammation from the sea would be preferable to
011 R F Wise
any further development in this area
In fill sites such as the development just refused planning permission at No. 1 Harper Way even though it was
012 G Hemmings
recommended for acceptance by the planning office why was this
No, no, no land should not be released from Green Belt. No more development. The North East of England would be a
013 Etchells
good place to develop