Planning - Summary of all comments - Amazon Web Services

More documents

Recommendations

Info

332 Mr & Mrs Jones Imagine you live in another part of England and think, is there anything in Essex that as a tourist I would want to visit' and you answer your own question. As for leisure, I do not think more nightclubs open 24 hours a day or keep fit centres open only to those who can afford to use them would be any use to me or the vast number of 40 somethings in this area. Provide facilities along the River Crouch area to encourage tourists and locals to enjoy our open spaces, particularly along 333 Mr & Mrs Hopkins the river areas. 334 Mrs Amey Living where I do the leisure facilities aer fine. I do not really see Rochford as a tourist area. Leisure facilities are important though and I would like to see more use made 347 Mr C Rooke of our water based facilities - not just for the 'well to do'. 1. Why was the new leisure centre in Rawreth Lane built without a swimming pool - one is needed in this area. 2. Take 349 Ms C Paine some Green Belt out of agricultural use and do a rare breeds centre/woodland. 3. In Rawreth we need more G.P's. 350 Mr A James I believe the council is doing enough in this area. 352 Cllr Joyce Smith Similar comments to 4. If you increase facilities you will spoil the countryside that you want people to visit. Facilities should be made for leisure and tourism. On the river front at Hullbridge we have no access for use for pleasure. I would like to suggest making a prominard on river front on Pooles Lane playing field. By making a road in forming a prominard or park for leisure. The slipway at the end Ferry Road should be made good and longer and a charge should be made for boats and parking boat trailers by way of pay and display machine in car park and trailer to be attached to the towing vehicle at all times suggest fee of £10.00 for five hours to cost of maintenance of slipway. Kendle Park is badly in 353 Mr R J Saward need of a rebuild. What reason would enough people have to want to visit this area, to look at all our car sales plots, to see all the traffic jams, or tour the toytown estates. Hunt out Rayleigh Windmill or Dutch Cottage. We don't need any more superstores, car lots, or huge housing estates, or industrial estates, we need leisure that suits all ages, groups and pockets, even Hockley Woods one has to walk through piles of dog poo, maybe a large area to just walk our thousands of dogs in the area in would be 354 Mrs Smith good. The Parish Council has worked hard and successfully in conjunction with the County Council to improve access to the footpath network. Our open spaces similarly have been enhanced (not without some local difficilty) to encourage greater enjoyment and healthy exercise for our community. The river networks throughout the district could provide more leisure opportunities. The Jubilee Countrypark and the upper reaches of the Roach Valley could continue to provide a benefit for 355 Mr K Vingoe tourism and leisure and the development of an environmental centre would be seen as assisting this. Over-reliance on tourism can spoil the very nature of the area that tourism can attract. Various pockets of the area are already tourist centres, eg the reputation of Battlesbridge attracts antiques collectors, but it would not be right for, say, Rochford town centre to become an 'antiques and tea shop' centre. In addition, there is a shortage of hotel and B&B accommodation; what there is is mainly on the corridors to Southend, so any facilities would need to be of significant interest to divert people into the Rochford Council area. A significant investment in publicity would need to go hand-in-hand 356 Mr & Mrs D Dobbin with developing the facilities. By developing shopping malls and out of town areas you are killing off the independent traders, who give good service. Soon we will have no choice. It will soon be all big stores like ASDA, TESCO, SAINSBURYS, nowhere where you can buy 1 screw or specialist clothes etc and get advice at the same time. Make parking free in town centres so the independents 357 Ms V O'Malley can compete. New town at Rawreth could have healthcare, leisure and shopping facilities. Nature reserves down the Crouch could attract 358 Mr & Mrs England tourists via A12/A130.
359 Mr New I do not see this as a tourist area, it is too built up with large housing developments along the railway corridor. We lack ancient large houses etc and good coastal areas except Southend. Clearly leisure is important with expanded and protected country park land, public open space, visitor centre/tourist attractions and even greatly expanded water-based recreation. This district has a long unused coast line and this could be a big money-spinner for the whole area. Enhanced shopping areas are needed - particularly the rather pathetic Rochford 360 Mr A J Eisenhauer Town Centre - but only on existing brownfield sites not on new green belt land. Community, leisure and tourism facilities may in very special circumstances be appropriate in Green Belt locations particularly new facilities which may significantly improve/enhance better community facilities particularly if these are provided at the expense of the private sector. Additionally, sustainable development criteria may outweigh site specific designations and provide a justified rationale for limited release of Green Belt land for community, leisure and tourist development. A suitable policy could propose sustainability criteria such as proximity to the local population/community, need for the facility, proximity to public transport and other leisure/sports/tourist facilities, relationship with other facilities which may be just outside of the boundaries of the District. For example, land adjacent to Southview Close on redevelopment for residential could support the need to develop a tenis club providing an enhanced sport and community 362 Ms M Power facility. Such a scheme may or may not fall within PPG2 acceptable development criteria but more often than not the High quality healthcare is not provided thoughout the district. Swimming pool is needed in Rayleigh - as has been said 365 Mrs H J Springham many times before. Lack of public transport to Clements Hall and Rayleigh Leisure Centre. Better tourism should be promoted by the improvement of existing infrastructure. The existing roads, healthcare, public 366 Mr S J Springham transport systems etc are inadequate for existing inhabitants let alone any increase in population. 369 Mr & Mrs Gauden Existing facilities are sufficient. One of the main problems with the leisure facilities in the Rayleigh area is that over the years the ones that could have been beneficial to the town today have been demolished and "developed", ie Crown Bingo Hall, Rayleigh's cinema and Rayleigh's 370 Mr G Biner speedway track. 371 Swanton A cinema in Rayleigh? More land for allotments. None in Hockley.
Page 1 and 2:
ROCHFORD DISTRICT LOCAL DEVELOPMENT
Page 3 and 4:
Rep No Contact Name General comment
Page 5 and 6:
024 Mr P Williams 025 Mrs P Clifton
Page 7 and 8:
050 Mrs J Samuels 051 Mrs D Langdon
Page 9 and 10:
069 Mrs B Buckland 070 P Robertson
Page 11 and 12:
091 Ms P Bailey 092 Mrs M Hills 095
Page 13 and 14:
121 Mrs S J Attfield 122 F E Wells
Page 15 and 16:
144 Mr C Bambury 145 Mr A Lysons 14
Page 17 and 18:
159 Mr & Mrs J Collins I do not hav
Page 19 and 20:
177 Mr J East 178 Mr D Livermore 17
Page 21 and 22:
198 Mr J Clamp 200 Mr T O'Shea 201
Page 23 and 24:
222 R Luck 225 Mr P Court 227 Mr &
Page 25 and 26:
246 Miss M Saward 248 Mr A Presslee
Page 27 and 28:
259 Mr M B Rogers 260 Mr & Mrs Will
Page 29 and 30:
272 Mr A Patton 273 Mr J Wilson 274
Page 31 and 32:
300 Mrs Upson I have answered this
Page 33 and 34:
322 Ms J Hitchcock 323 Mr T Beebee
Page 35 and 36:
338 Mr & Mrs Saunders We have been
Page 37 and 38:
357 Ms V O'Malley Perhaps the gover
Page 39 and 40:
1. HOUSING Where should land be rel
Page 41 and 42:
014 D Hanrahan I do not agree furth
Page 43 and 44:
040 Mr D Huskisson The Ashingdon Ro
Page 45 and 46:
070 P Robertson Rayleigh and the su
Page 47 and 48:
102 Mr T Newton Firstly why are you
Page 49 and 50:
130 Mrs S Martin 131 Mel Bennett 13
Page 51 and 52:
160 Ms S Barnes No green belt shoul
Page 53 and 54:
189 Mr G Gooding 190 Mr G J Tinsey
Page 55 and 56:
215 Mr T R Thompson 216 Mr & Mrs D
Page 57 and 58:
237 Mr Sanders We should not be rel
Page 59 and 60:
263 Mr P Kneen 264 Mr K Coleman 265
Page 61 and 62:
286 Mr L F Knight No more housing w
Page 63 and 64:
319 Mr M Lang Not down in this corn
Page 65 and 66:
355 Mr K Vingoe 356 Mr & Mrs D Dobb
Page 67 and 68:
2. AFFORDABLE HOUSING Have we got t
Page 69 and 70:
Mr R Huckett & Ms C Mobbs Affordabl
Page 71 and 72:
065 Mr T Bennett Affordable (truly
Page 73 and 74:
104 B Aspinall In my opinion the cu
Page 75 and 76:
145 Mr A Lysons There is no wy I ca
Page 77 and 78:
180 Mr R Swain Local jobs are usual
Page 79 and 80:
213 Mr M Wheeler 215 Mr T R Thompso
Page 81 and 82:
251 Mr B Guyett - Chairman We agree
Page 83 and 84:
287 Mr R Forster Cannot comment as
Page 85 and 86:
327 Mrs C Taylor 329 Mrs M J Snowdo
Page 87 and 88:
3. JOBS Where can we find land for
Page 89 and 90:
021 Mr P Jermyn There is enough spa
Page 91 and 92:
063 Mr B A Stammers Broardband mean
Page 93 and 94:
113 Mr & Mrs Rowland Apprentaships
Page 95 and 96:
158 Mr & Mrs White 159 Mr & Mrs J C
Page 97 and 98:
193 Ms S Swift Should be on sites v
Page 99 and 100:
236 Mr & Mrs Beattie Transport link
Page 101 and 102:
274 Mr S Mckinnon Employment where
Page 103 and 104:
321 R J Feather How will the jobs b
Page 105 and 106:
4. PROTECTION Are there any other a
Page 107 and 108:
026 Mr A Lantaff As stated earlier
Page 109 and 110:
073 Mr S Learmouth I believe strong
Page 111 and 112:
136 Mrs G E Chase Protect our areas
Page 113 and 114:
178 Mr D Livermore Protect all of t
Page 115 and 116:
228 Ms A Henderson I think the coun
Page 117 and 118:
261 S A Skinner 262 Ms L Parish I w
Page 119 and 120:
301 Ms K Kelly 4.3 Protection and e
Page 121 and 122: 354 Mrs Smith This side of the rive
Page 123 and 124: Rep No Contact Name Character Comme
Page 125 and 126: 052 Mr & Mrs D Lench Too many expen
Page 127 and 128: 106 Ms P Melito Rochford should alw
Page 129 and 130: 166 G W Fleming All aeras must be m
Page 131 and 132: 204 Mr R Gould As before 205 Mrs Wh
Page 133 and 134: 251 Mr B Guyett - Chairman No, you
Page 135 and 136: 301 Ms K Kelly 4.9 Good design and
Page 137 and 138: 359 Mr New The district is short of
Page 139 and 140: Rep No Contact Name Energy & Water
Page 141 and 142: 046 Mr & Mrs J Cripps See 1.0 - why
Page 143 and 144: 093 Mrs M J Owoo I think you are do
Page 145 and 146: 140 Mrs J Davies If you are referin
Page 147 and 148: 181 Mrs M R Hutchings What do you m
Page 149 and 150: 224 Mr K S Gee Water - there are se
Page 151 and 152: 263 Mr P Kneen Whilst Swan Hill ack
Page 153 and 154: 307 Mr J Snow Extra development mea
Page 155 and 156: 7. LEISURE, TOURISM & COMMUNITY FAC
Page 157 and 158: 027 Mr B Fuller Leisure facilities
Page 159 and 160: 069 Mrs B Buckland 070 P Robertson
Page 161 and 162: 112 A J Smythe Green Burial sites -
Page 163 and 164: 156 J W Collins Rochford does not n
Page 165 and 166: 190 Mr G J Tinsey New facilities sh
Page 167 and 168: 235 L W Lewis There are not enough
Page 169 and 170: 268 Mr S Crussell We don't really h
Page 171: 317 Mr D Harris Having attended a '
Page 175 and 176: Rep No Contact Name CPO and Plannin
Page 177 and 178: 057 Mrs J Williams Developers shoul
Page 179 and 180: 102 Mr T Newton Compulsory purchase
Page 181 and 182: 158 Mr & Mrs White Some compulsory
Page 183 and 184: 196 Mr A E Hodges The voluntary app
Page 185 and 186: 246 Miss M Saward No this is not fa
Page 187 and 188: 306 Mr E C Cook See comments under
Page 189 and 190: 362 Ms M Power Circular 1/97 provid
show all

Planning - Summary of all comments - Amazon Web Services

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?