24.07.2013 Views

Planning - Summary of all comments - Amazon Web Services

Planning - Summary of all comments - Amazon Web Services

Planning - Summary of all comments - Amazon Web Services

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

357 Ms V O'M<strong>all</strong>ey<br />

Affordable housing IS a major issue, at least 50% <strong>of</strong> new homes built should be cheaper accommodation for the many<br />

single people and the growing older population, who will be moving into sm<strong>all</strong>er more manageable properties.<br />

358 Mr & Mrs England 40% is fine. If you build new town at Rawreth rather than more estates you can build a selection <strong>of</strong> different housing.<br />

Affordable housing is essential. 40% looks reasonable for a large site or new town. ? On sm<strong>all</strong> sites is likely to be a bad<br />

359 Mr New<br />

use <strong>of</strong> space.<br />

The RSS14 requires that district affordable housing policies will not be less than 30% and should aspire to 40%. In order for<br />

the affordable housing policies not to stifle the delivery <strong>of</strong> affordable housing, in <strong>all</strong> new developments a requirement <strong>of</strong><br />

30% should be set (ie not just <strong>all</strong>ocated sites). The Council will need to ensure that <strong>all</strong> requirements for affordable housing<br />

are considered in the light <strong>of</strong> site specific criteria and if a case for less affordable housing is pursued that the lower level <strong>of</strong><br />

affordable housing is linked to a financial appraisal. On rural exception sites, it is not considered sound to require <strong>all</strong> units<br />

to be affordable, this may not be a viable option and therefore the provision <strong>of</strong> affordable housing should be linked to an<br />

362 Ms M Power<br />

assessment <strong>of</strong> the site location, character and viability considerations.<br />

365 Mrs H J Springham 40% seems too high.<br />

366 Mr S J Springham<br />

40% <strong>of</strong> housing to be 'affordable' is too great by a massive factor. There cannot be 40% requirement for essential services<br />

personnel who cannot afford better housing - lobby the government to increase essential services personnel salaries.<br />

In view <strong>of</strong> our <strong>comments</strong> above it is difficult to answer these other sections. The south east in general is over developed<br />

369 Mr & Mrs Gauden and overcrowded. There should be a complete block on further building.<br />

Surely it should be the young pr<strong>of</strong>essionals, tradesmen and families that we should be trying to encourage into the area. It<br />

seems that the new developments in our existing towns demand such a high premium, which makes them unaffordable to<br />

the people that we need in the area. Therefore over-development in our existing towns is not the answer to affordable<br />

housing. The most obvious way to achieve affordable housing in this area would be to create a new town and to cap the<br />

prices that developers could charge. This may also discourage the large, national, pr<strong>of</strong>iteering developers and give more <strong>of</strong><br />

370 Mr G Biner<br />

a change to local sm<strong>all</strong>er companies and trades people.<br />

371 Swanton Yes - more housing to rent

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!