Planning - Summary of all comments - Amazon Web Services

More documents

Recommendations

Info

246 Miss M Saward We need to publisize a lot more about recycling. At the moment we can only kerbside recycle unless you have a car to get to anywhere. Do more kerbside recycling. Also paper why can we only recycle paper (not shredded paper and envelopes). What about cardboard, plastic bottles and certainly green waste look at how busy the tip is. If we do not encourage more kerbside people will fly tip and dump. We need to do as much as is possible to reserve water and produce renewable energy sources locally. We also support 247 Mr & Mrs Addison nuclear energy. A new Bradwell Power Station would be acceptable. It is axiomatic that with the lowest rainfall in the country, the need for water conservation and provision is esential. Water authorities need to be consulted to ensure adequacy of supply. New developments should encompass the latest 251 Mr B Guyett - Chairman conservation measures as a requirement. 253 Mr M J Smith It is always important to do more. Windpower and solar power are grossly under used. Yes. Definitely - this is definitely the future our children are being educated this way and yet we appear to do nothing. Our recycling was excellend and then they reduced that and started charging to take our green bin - a service we had for free. People who were starting to recycle because it was easy stopped as you were making it harder. Charging for a service we had got used to having angered people and they simply don't bother. I will always recycle and take everything to my recycling centre but we need to encourage the majority to do the same. A shame we did have a much better service but for 254 Ms V Stanesby some reason you stopped it. As a consequence of both Local Agenda 21 and the growing concern over water resources and carbon emissions, we support the suggestion that a policy should require at least compliance with minimum energy efficiency standards, but in order for such a policy not to simply duplicate current standards which could be reviewed within the lifetime of the Core 257 Mr T Dodkins Strategy, an enhancement of standards to attempt to achieve carbon neutrality should be enshrined in policy. 258 National TV and press have this item covered. All we could do is repeat / copy. I think that after 12 o'clock streets should only have every other light on. Anybody with any sense is indoors by then. Those that are not are probably in a car. Where I live its like daylight all night. Not good for natural animals and not saving 259 Mr M B Rogers electricity. Energy: I live in an area where there are not many street lights and manage quite well so why is it there are so many lights along the A127. Could they not do away with every other one it seems an awful waste of energy. Water: why is it that you are doing away with reservoirs which we need and then build more houses which means more water needed (cut off your 260 Mr & Mrs Willey nose to spite your face) I agree with the Councils's strategy to require new buildings to have renewable energy provision. There should not be any exceptions. The Council should set an example by installing renewable energy provision in its own buildings wherever possible. Think of the amount of energy somewhere like Clements Hall leisure centre uses. Could hot air from the Council 261 S A Skinner chamber be used to power the civic suite? Education is the answer to persuade people to conserve energy. In the 80's we saw stickers on light switches 'to switch off when not in use'. Office blocks and shops do not need to be lit up all night. Larger grants (say 75%) towards installation of solar panels to a property would help. Liaise with manufacturers of electrical appliances to make units not being used, 262 Ms L Parish switch off automatically after a certain length of time and not just be put permanently on standby.
263 Mr P Kneen Whilst Swan Hill acknowledges the need to consider issues of climate change within developments, it is considered that setting a stringent requirement that all developments must meet a certain target does not provide a sufficiently flexible manner in which to promote more sustainable forms of development. Swan Hill recognises the Government's commitment set out in its Energy White Paper for reducing carbon dioxide emissions. In this regard, it is widely considered by other Local Planning Authorities that new developments should generate an element of electricity required by the development from renewable energy. Swan Hill has not objection in principle to the inclusion of such technologies within developments provided that their inclusion, along with other requirements, does not result in an unviable development. It is considered that the 'probable' option of requiring all new housing and employment development to include renewable energy probision is inflexible and does not allow sufficient flexibility to consider site specific considerations which may not allow the inclusion We fully support measures to conserve energy and water and the principles of sustainable construction. In particular the 265 Mr R Pomery benefits of hemp, some of which is used in the insulation of buildings. Planning for new developments, both housing and other, should have a requirement for some renewable energy (solar 267 Mr D Pointer panels or wind turbines) and should have rain water storage. Improved recycling facilities should be provided. A firm policy is needed as anything else will be met with typical apathy. Better recycling facilities essential (eg it takes me 268 Mr S Crussell an hour on a Sunday to recycle at Rayleigh - and often bins are full!). EWT considers that the council should be playing a lead role here. Water conservation is a major interest, standards for collection of water from hard surfaces ie roofs and surface runoff should be developed and all housing developments should have plans for recycling of grey water. We would encourage RDC to adopt the highest standards of home insulation 270 possible for new properties in the interest both of the environment and also the future homeowners. You need to be leading the debate on this area, for once RDC can preempt future government guidelines these issues are 271 Mr & Mrs Jobson only going to become more not less important over the next 15 years. Environmental energy and water issues should be supported by RDC. However, only when they can be demonstrable in 274 Mr S Mckinnon having a positive effect. Energy and Water Conservation Water resources are a key issue for south Essex, which imports the majority of its water. Our representations to the East of England Plan highlighted the need for all new development to incorporate water efficiency measures. A saving of approximately 25% can be achieved through the use of relatively simple measures such as: sprays taps, efficient appliances and low flush toilets. We would recommend the inclusino of a specific target for this key issue. Further guidance on possible techniques is available from myself or on our website www.environmentagency.gov.uk. Waste is a further key issue for south Essex, with landfill space rapidly decreasing. This section could be broadened to 'Resource Efficiency', which should include waste reduction. Site waste management plans should be required to limit construction waste, while space for the storage of recyclable materials should be provided within developments. Renewable Energy We support the identification of this issue, but feel that the 'probable' options 276 Mr M Barrell should be boradened. There are a range of renewable energy options, from ground source heat pumps to biomass 277 Ms S A Elkington Offer energy/water advice in home/work place free of charge. 278 Mr P Marshall Quite satisfactory at the moment. Not sure if there's a lot more extra building. 279 S J Heeney Do not understand the question. 280 Mrs M A Tyrell Whatever buildings take place - our roads, all our utilities, schools, hospital, doctors and dentists must be in place first. So much is already overstretched.
Page 1 and 2:
ROCHFORD DISTRICT LOCAL DEVELOPMENT
Page 3 and 4:
Rep No Contact Name General comment
Page 5 and 6:
024 Mr P Williams 025 Mrs P Clifton
Page 7 and 8:
050 Mrs J Samuels 051 Mrs D Langdon
Page 9 and 10:
069 Mrs B Buckland 070 P Robertson
Page 11 and 12:
091 Ms P Bailey 092 Mrs M Hills 095
Page 13 and 14:
121 Mrs S J Attfield 122 F E Wells
Page 15 and 16:
144 Mr C Bambury 145 Mr A Lysons 14
Page 17 and 18:
159 Mr & Mrs J Collins I do not hav
Page 19 and 20:
177 Mr J East 178 Mr D Livermore 17
Page 21 and 22:
198 Mr J Clamp 200 Mr T O'Shea 201
Page 23 and 24:
222 R Luck 225 Mr P Court 227 Mr &
Page 25 and 26:
246 Miss M Saward 248 Mr A Presslee
Page 27 and 28:
259 Mr M B Rogers 260 Mr & Mrs Will
Page 29 and 30:
272 Mr A Patton 273 Mr J Wilson 274
Page 31 and 32:
300 Mrs Upson I have answered this
Page 33 and 34:
322 Ms J Hitchcock 323 Mr T Beebee
Page 35 and 36:
338 Mr & Mrs Saunders We have been
Page 37 and 38:
357 Ms V O'Malley Perhaps the gover
Page 39 and 40:
1. HOUSING Where should land be rel
Page 41 and 42:
014 D Hanrahan I do not agree furth
Page 43 and 44:
040 Mr D Huskisson The Ashingdon Ro
Page 45 and 46:
070 P Robertson Rayleigh and the su
Page 47 and 48:
102 Mr T Newton Firstly why are you
Page 49 and 50:
130 Mrs S Martin 131 Mel Bennett 13
Page 51 and 52:
160 Ms S Barnes No green belt shoul
Page 53 and 54:
189 Mr G Gooding 190 Mr G J Tinsey
Page 55 and 56:
215 Mr T R Thompson 216 Mr & Mrs D
Page 57 and 58:
237 Mr Sanders We should not be rel
Page 59 and 60:
263 Mr P Kneen 264 Mr K Coleman 265
Page 61 and 62:
286 Mr L F Knight No more housing w
Page 63 and 64:
319 Mr M Lang Not down in this corn
Page 65 and 66:
355 Mr K Vingoe 356 Mr & Mrs D Dobb
Page 67 and 68:
2. AFFORDABLE HOUSING Have we got t
Page 69 and 70:
Mr R Huckett & Ms C Mobbs Affordabl
Page 71 and 72:
065 Mr T Bennett Affordable (truly
Page 73 and 74:
104 B Aspinall In my opinion the cu
Page 75 and 76:
145 Mr A Lysons There is no wy I ca
Page 77 and 78:
180 Mr R Swain Local jobs are usual
Page 79 and 80:
213 Mr M Wheeler 215 Mr T R Thompso
Page 81 and 82:
251 Mr B Guyett - Chairman We agree
Page 83 and 84:
287 Mr R Forster Cannot comment as
Page 85 and 86:
327 Mrs C Taylor 329 Mrs M J Snowdo
Page 87 and 88:
3. JOBS Where can we find land for
Page 89 and 90:
021 Mr P Jermyn There is enough spa
Page 91 and 92:
063 Mr B A Stammers Broardband mean
Page 93 and 94:
113 Mr & Mrs Rowland Apprentaships
Page 95 and 96:
158 Mr & Mrs White 159 Mr & Mrs J C
Page 97 and 98:
193 Ms S Swift Should be on sites v
Page 99 and 100: 236 Mr & Mrs Beattie Transport link
Page 101 and 102: 274 Mr S Mckinnon Employment where
Page 103 and 104: 321 R J Feather How will the jobs b
Page 105 and 106: 4. PROTECTION Are there any other a
Page 107 and 108: 026 Mr A Lantaff As stated earlier
Page 109 and 110: 073 Mr S Learmouth I believe strong
Page 111 and 112: 136 Mrs G E Chase Protect our areas
Page 113 and 114: 178 Mr D Livermore Protect all of t
Page 115 and 116: 228 Ms A Henderson I think the coun
Page 117 and 118: 261 S A Skinner 262 Ms L Parish I w
Page 119 and 120: 301 Ms K Kelly 4.3 Protection and e
Page 121 and 122: 354 Mrs Smith This side of the rive
Page 123 and 124: Rep No Contact Name Character Comme
Page 125 and 126: 052 Mr & Mrs D Lench Too many expen
Page 127 and 128: 106 Ms P Melito Rochford should alw
Page 129 and 130: 166 G W Fleming All aeras must be m
Page 131 and 132: 204 Mr R Gould As before 205 Mrs Wh
Page 133 and 134: 251 Mr B Guyett - Chairman No, you
Page 135 and 136: 301 Ms K Kelly 4.9 Good design and
Page 137 and 138: 359 Mr New The district is short of
Page 139 and 140: Rep No Contact Name Energy & Water
Page 141 and 142: 046 Mr & Mrs J Cripps See 1.0 - why
Page 143 and 144: 093 Mrs M J Owoo I think you are do
Page 145 and 146: 140 Mrs J Davies If you are referin
Page 147 and 148: 181 Mrs M R Hutchings What do you m
Page 149: 224 Mr K S Gee Water - there are se
Page 153 and 154: 307 Mr J Snow Extra development mea
Page 155 and 156: 7. LEISURE, TOURISM & COMMUNITY FAC
Page 157 and 158: 027 Mr B Fuller Leisure facilities
Page 159 and 160: 069 Mrs B Buckland 070 P Robertson
Page 161 and 162: 112 A J Smythe Green Burial sites -
Page 163 and 164: 156 J W Collins Rochford does not n
Page 165 and 166: 190 Mr G J Tinsey New facilities sh
Page 167 and 168: 235 L W Lewis There are not enough
Page 169 and 170: 268 Mr S Crussell We don't really h
Page 171 and 172: 317 Mr D Harris Having attended a '
Page 173 and 174: 359 Mr New I do not see this as a t
Page 175 and 176: Rep No Contact Name CPO and Plannin
Page 177 and 178: 057 Mrs J Williams Developers shoul
Page 179 and 180: 102 Mr T Newton Compulsory purchase
Page 181 and 182: 158 Mr & Mrs White Some compulsory
Page 183 and 184: 196 Mr A E Hodges The voluntary app
Page 185 and 186: 246 Miss M Saward No this is not fa
Page 187 and 188: 306 Mr E C Cook See comments under
Page 189 and 190: 362 Ms M Power Circular 1/97 provid
show all

Planning - Summary of all comments - Amazon Web Services

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?