Planning - Summary of all comments - Amazon Web Services

More documents

Recommendations

Info

038 Mr J Wright 039 Ms D Quinn 040 Mr D Huskisson 041 Mr McGee 042 Mr & Mrs Mossman 045 Mr R Abbott 046 Mr & Mrs J Cripps 047 Ms J Colbourne 049 Mr & Mrs Kitchen We are only a small county. We only have so much land. Historically we are the gateway to England. No other County has as much history. It is true you cannot stop development, but it has to be done in a structured manner. The Essex Gateway is a disaster in the making. It is known as Essex Concrete if you build a road, then sooner or later buildings pop up along it. More roads - more traffic (ie new A130, now traffic jams up on the Rayleigh Spur and A127). More houses - more cars, places at schools, hospitals etc more waste. New factories - more jobs. NO! Outsiders come in to fill the vacancies and buy our houses etc. We should be doing more for the policing of our area to keep it safe, more to allow young people to get priority for a home in the district they were born in and while we're about it lets turn Rayleigh Town Centre back to a shopping centre and not a lager brains paradise of a weekend. (nothing against sensible drinking). Rayleigh used to be a very pleasant place to live, it now no longer is. Expansion in housing requires more social and transport facilities. There is a need for more Civic Amenity sites. We are not allowed to use the Stock Road site any more. One should be built near Rochford (maybe the Purdeys Industrial Estate). Rayleigh is too far to go, burning up more petrol than could ever be saved through recycling. Gypsy traveller sites are needed all over the country but are not peopular with settled communities. Rochford remains a rural area, and is therefore better suited than most to offer a site for this purpose. There has to be a solution to this problem. The off road parking in side roads is out of control, i.e. parking on bends, parking on bus routes, parking across pavements, parking partly on pavements, people with prams have to go into road to get past them. Covering car parks into patios so car's have to park in road. This is just a small part of the problem that no one seems to try to stop or police or council can be bothered with I am please as residents in the area that we have been asked our views on the Planning for the future. For 3700 homes to be built in this area, all key factors in your questionnaire would indeed have to be resolved. However, my family and I are totally opposed to any further housing development in the South East of England. The general consensus in the vicinity is that our right to breathe clean air and the fundamental need for space, has been eroded. It is not our wish to have any further development in an already overcrowded and overstretched South East and to rescind any green belt is abhorent. We intend to stand firm and together on this issue. Sorry I am late returning this. No council could do more for its residents than give them the opportunity to voice their opinions. I really had to struggle to answer this questionnaire. It stops to make you think. Thank you. As you can tell by our comments we feel this country (it's Government) has no idea where it is heading - Development, Immigration, Law & Order, Infrastructure, Health Care. All will suffer (further) from artificial development unless the load is spread over the whole country. Please organize a referendum for and against Central Government Policy - bring back "Local control". RDC could do more to recycle. There is no way for people living in Hullbridge, without a car, to recycle cardboard, plastic recycling needs to be upgraded - why is it only bottles that can be recycled at the local collection point in our village? Unadopted roads in Hullbridge - what is being done about this issue? The parish council has been campaining to RDC to adopt the roads in Hullbridge - when can we expect to see a plan for this? It is disappointing to note that residents have had their privacy spoilt by allowing developments and conversions that overlook gardens. Home owners have frequently spent a lifetime aquiring a property only to have their plans dashed by weak planning controls.
050 Mrs J Samuels 051 Mrs D Langdon 052 Mr & Mrs D Lench 055 Mr V Hawtree 056 Mr S Lee 057 Mrs J Williams 058 M J Jackson 059 Garfield Unless this government or future governments create a policy of curbing our current levels of immigration, the movement of peoples from inner London to the outer periphery, to the suburbs of London, then to Southend and Rochford and other coastal areas will continue. Supplying high estates on green belt land will not stop this phenomenon and it will reduce the quality of life for all. Local government should be more forceful and work with the governemnt to protect our environment from the evils of more transport etc. Last Sunday my husband and I had to go to Burnham-on-Sea. It took us one hour to get out of the Rochford and Southend area because of sheer volume of traffic on all possible routes. Eventually, we had to travel along Southend seafront to Hadleigh. Please do not make the visions of Aldous Huxley in 'Brave New World' regarding the environment become a certainty!! We have a problem with parking in our turning people use our drive for turning and park across our drive etc. We require yellow lines etc. Also why do you not provide parking bays on the service road (London Road) Grange estate Rayleigh plenty of land behind the hedge. The pavement on service road too narrow. People have to walk in the middle of the road - very dangerous. Where are any clubs for the retired in Rayleigh? On retirement a pamphlet from local council advising of all local clubs would be helpful. A bus route for the county to enable us to use our bus pass to best effect while we can. More facilities for young people and working class. There is too much that costs too much eg Clements Hall, bus fares, train fares. Library in Rochford open 9-5 6 days a week. More cash points to reduce waiting time. Supermarket open until 8pm or later. C.A.B. expanded and protected from "Big Brother" interference. There have been some very impressive improvements in recent years, it is clear some people should be thanked - eg more flats, improved public transport, award winning doctors surgery (Back Lane) new dentist, waste collection, Doggetts wildlife area, low on crime, good reputation for local schools. The area doesn't have the infrastructure to expand. During rush hours all five roads to the West are gridlocked, the two railways are dangerously overcrowded. We need to build a bridge across the Crouch somewhere between Fambridge and Wallasea and another across the Thames from Canvey. Until we get a more enlightened National Government I suggest you use delaying tactics. Call meetings, form discussion groups, conduct surveys. I expect you will need a few years to examine this core strategy questionnaire. As I stated overleaf, Rochford has a unique character and I believe one of the oldest towns in the East, dating back to Roman times and beyond. Perhaps many people are unaware of this and maybe some type of plaque or notice board giving a history of Rochford Square, ie the age of the market, Henry the Eigth, Anne Boleyn, even the fact if my research is correct that Oliver Cromwell visited Rochford. I'm sure this would attract interest from people who are interested in local history and our towns rich heritage. In my opinion, before we build new houses, we need to ensure that systems work properly for the houses and residents which we already have. Recycling and public transport links need to be improved first in order to try to reduce the existing burden on the environment. Once these issues have been addressed, the focus must be on sustainable development, not simply the need to meet government targets. The state of some roads in the District is appalling, and needs urgent consideration. Traffic crossing attendents should be instructed to give more consideration to traffic flow. More parking spaces should be provided in shopping centres ie Rayleigh High Street. Before bowing to the influx of foreigners - homes should be allocated to second and third generation (I'm not a racist - just believe charity begins with the Brits). This part of the country has gone down hill, especially over the last 2 years, and to be honest I'm glad to be moving away from the area.
Page 1 and 2: ROCHFORD DISTRICT LOCAL DEVELOPMENT
Page 3 and 4: Rep No Contact Name General comment
Page 5: 024 Mr P Williams 025 Mrs P Clifton
Page 9 and 10: 069 Mrs B Buckland 070 P Robertson
Page 11 and 12: 091 Ms P Bailey 092 Mrs M Hills 095
Page 13 and 14: 121 Mrs S J Attfield 122 F E Wells
Page 15 and 16: 144 Mr C Bambury 145 Mr A Lysons 14
Page 17 and 18: 159 Mr & Mrs J Collins I do not hav
Page 19 and 20: 177 Mr J East 178 Mr D Livermore 17
Page 21 and 22: 198 Mr J Clamp 200 Mr T O'Shea 201
Page 23 and 24: 222 R Luck 225 Mr P Court 227 Mr &
Page 25 and 26: 246 Miss M Saward 248 Mr A Presslee
Page 27 and 28: 259 Mr M B Rogers 260 Mr & Mrs Will
Page 29 and 30: 272 Mr A Patton 273 Mr J Wilson 274
Page 31 and 32: 300 Mrs Upson I have answered this
Page 33 and 34: 322 Ms J Hitchcock 323 Mr T Beebee
Page 35 and 36: 338 Mr & Mrs Saunders We have been
Page 37 and 38: 357 Ms V O'Malley Perhaps the gover
Page 39 and 40: 1. HOUSING Where should land be rel
Page 41 and 42: 014 D Hanrahan I do not agree furth
Page 43 and 44: 040 Mr D Huskisson The Ashingdon Ro
Page 45 and 46: 070 P Robertson Rayleigh and the su
Page 47 and 48: 102 Mr T Newton Firstly why are you
Page 49 and 50: 130 Mrs S Martin 131 Mel Bennett 13
Page 51 and 52: 160 Ms S Barnes No green belt shoul
Page 53 and 54: 189 Mr G Gooding 190 Mr G J Tinsey
Page 55 and 56: 215 Mr T R Thompson 216 Mr & Mrs D
Page 57 and 58:
237 Mr Sanders We should not be rel
Page 59 and 60:
263 Mr P Kneen 264 Mr K Coleman 265
Page 61 and 62:
286 Mr L F Knight No more housing w
Page 63 and 64:
319 Mr M Lang Not down in this corn
Page 65 and 66:
355 Mr K Vingoe 356 Mr & Mrs D Dobb
Page 67 and 68:
2. AFFORDABLE HOUSING Have we got t
Page 69 and 70:
Mr R Huckett & Ms C Mobbs Affordabl
Page 71 and 72:
065 Mr T Bennett Affordable (truly
Page 73 and 74:
104 B Aspinall In my opinion the cu
Page 75 and 76:
145 Mr A Lysons There is no wy I ca
Page 77 and 78:
180 Mr R Swain Local jobs are usual
Page 79 and 80:
213 Mr M Wheeler 215 Mr T R Thompso
Page 81 and 82:
251 Mr B Guyett - Chairman We agree
Page 83 and 84:
287 Mr R Forster Cannot comment as
Page 85 and 86:
327 Mrs C Taylor 329 Mrs M J Snowdo
Page 87 and 88:
3. JOBS Where can we find land for
Page 89 and 90:
021 Mr P Jermyn There is enough spa
Page 91 and 92:
063 Mr B A Stammers Broardband mean
Page 93 and 94:
113 Mr & Mrs Rowland Apprentaships
Page 95 and 96:
158 Mr & Mrs White 159 Mr & Mrs J C
Page 97 and 98:
193 Ms S Swift Should be on sites v
Page 99 and 100:
236 Mr & Mrs Beattie Transport link
Page 101 and 102:
274 Mr S Mckinnon Employment where
Page 103 and 104:
321 R J Feather How will the jobs b
Page 105 and 106:
4. PROTECTION Are there any other a
Page 107 and 108:
026 Mr A Lantaff As stated earlier
Page 109 and 110:
073 Mr S Learmouth I believe strong
Page 111 and 112:
136 Mrs G E Chase Protect our areas
Page 113 and 114:
178 Mr D Livermore Protect all of t
Page 115 and 116:
228 Ms A Henderson I think the coun
Page 117 and 118:
261 S A Skinner 262 Ms L Parish I w
Page 119 and 120:
301 Ms K Kelly 4.3 Protection and e
Page 121 and 122:
354 Mrs Smith This side of the rive
Page 123 and 124:
Rep No Contact Name Character Comme
Page 125 and 126:
052 Mr & Mrs D Lench Too many expen
Page 127 and 128:
106 Ms P Melito Rochford should alw
Page 129 and 130:
166 G W Fleming All aeras must be m
Page 131 and 132:
204 Mr R Gould As before 205 Mrs Wh
Page 133 and 134:
251 Mr B Guyett - Chairman No, you
Page 135 and 136:
301 Ms K Kelly 4.9 Good design and
Page 137 and 138:
359 Mr New The district is short of
Page 139 and 140:
Rep No Contact Name Energy & Water
Page 141 and 142:
046 Mr & Mrs J Cripps See 1.0 - why
Page 143 and 144:
093 Mrs M J Owoo I think you are do
Page 145 and 146:
140 Mrs J Davies If you are referin
Page 147 and 148:
181 Mrs M R Hutchings What do you m
Page 149 and 150:
224 Mr K S Gee Water - there are se
Page 151 and 152:
263 Mr P Kneen Whilst Swan Hill ack
Page 153 and 154:
307 Mr J Snow Extra development mea
Page 155 and 156:
7. LEISURE, TOURISM & COMMUNITY FAC
Page 157 and 158:
027 Mr B Fuller Leisure facilities
Page 159 and 160:
069 Mrs B Buckland 070 P Robertson
Page 161 and 162:
112 A J Smythe Green Burial sites -
Page 163 and 164:
156 J W Collins Rochford does not n
Page 165 and 166:
190 Mr G J Tinsey New facilities sh
Page 167 and 168:
235 L W Lewis There are not enough
Page 169 and 170:
268 Mr S Crussell We don't really h
Page 171 and 172:
317 Mr D Harris Having attended a '
Page 173 and 174:
359 Mr New I do not see this as a t
Page 175 and 176:
Rep No Contact Name CPO and Plannin
Page 177 and 178:
057 Mrs J Williams Developers shoul
Page 179 and 180:
102 Mr T Newton Compulsory purchase
Page 181 and 182:
158 Mr & Mrs White Some compulsory
Page 183 and 184:
196 Mr A E Hodges The voluntary app
Page 185 and 186:
246 Miss M Saward No this is not fa
Page 187 and 188:
306 Mr E C Cook See comments under
Page 189 and 190:
362 Ms M Power Circular 1/97 provid
show all

Planning - Summary of all comments - Amazon Web Services

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?