Planning - Summary of all comments - Amazon Web Services
Planning - Summary of all comments - Amazon Web Services
Planning - Summary of all comments - Amazon Web Services
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
143 J E Burfield<br />
Build! Build! How about infrastructure. It seems <strong>all</strong> council build regardless <strong>of</strong> whether the roads can cope. Have you even<br />
bothered to drive around Rayleigh, Hullbridge and Hockley any time <strong>of</strong> day.<br />
144 Mr C Bambury<br />
I would encourage the Council to adopt a policy that sought to locate development where access to day to day facilities and<br />
services is readily available by public transport, walking and cycling thereby reducing the need to travel, particularly by car.<br />
West <strong>of</strong> Rayleigh Weir, it's no good going east <strong>of</strong> Rayleigh because there isn't enough space for houses, business and<br />
145 Mr A Lysons<br />
roads, every thing has to come out East to West. The population is almost static, why do we need new towns?<br />
146 A C Barton Preferably nowhere, enough is enough, we have our share. New town with infrastructure - maybe<br />
Land should not be released from the green belt. Green belt should mean green belt! Increases in housing has already had<br />
a detrimental effect on water supplies and our sewers are overflowing when we have storms, not to mention traffic<br />
147 Mr I Rand<strong>all</strong><br />
conjestion.<br />
No the council should not consider any new development until a proper road and services have been provided. Perhaps<br />
those who make the planning decission are on a different planet to those who have to endure the missery and pollution<br />
caused by the incessant traffic on the road from Rayleigh to Southend, or the conjestion experienced by travellers plus<br />
148 L F W<strong>all</strong>ace<br />
traffic noise.<br />
149 Cunningham Leave the Green Belt alone. Traffic is heavy enough now. No more development in or around the above towns.<br />
150 Ms N Saunders<br />
Land should never be released from green belt - green belt land must be left as green. I think a new town would be better<br />
than squeezing flats and houses into tiny spaces. Another option - leave Essex alone and build new houses further North!<br />
The green belt has been lost to such an extent. Housing has been built from Rayleigh to Southend border. Sm<strong>all</strong> patches<br />
151 Mr R Roles<br />
remain, which if building housing continues will also disappear. Enough is enough. Leave the green belt alone.<br />
152 Mr S Crowther Continue to develop in and around settlements in the Rayleigh/Rochford area. A definite no to the building <strong>of</strong> a new town.<br />
If possible no more land should be released from the Green Belt areas. Brown field sites should be used (this should not<br />
include gardens being sold <strong>of</strong>f). Development around Rochford/Ashingdon/Hockley/Hawkwell should be kept to a minimum,<br />
153 Mrs S Bradshaw as so much development has taken place over the last 20 years.<br />
Rochford is becoming very conjested - there is enough housing in the area. More use needs to be made <strong>of</strong> derilict/empty<br />
155 Ms A Boulter<br />
buildings eg West Street.<br />
Rochford simply does not have space for 4,600 new homes. This figure has been foisted on the district by central<br />
Government who do not appear to have a clue. Rayleigh in particular is suffering over-development. Will we one day see<br />
one long urban sprawl from Rochford right over to Wickford? Worse still, will the whole area become a borough <strong>of</strong><br />
Southend City? A new town is not ideal either. A new Village(s) are the way forward - if they have in full range <strong>of</strong> local<br />
156 J W Collins<br />
amenities and infrastructure.<br />
We appear to have already met the housing requirement for Rayleigh Town in the "new town" adjoining Rawreth Lane (west<br />
Rayleigh) further building nearer to town centre is futile - as roads are already jammed and "rat runs" also at peak times are<br />
158 Mr & Mrs White at capacity.<br />
Land should NOT be released from green belt we will soon have none left! If necessary to develop in towns already<br />
existing, although I do not agree with this either. We do not have the infrastructure or transport to cope. These should<br />
come first before any more housing. Because we will soon find out to our cost if we do not and it will then be too late. The<br />
159 Mr & Mrs J Collins other option is not to build more hosuing in the South East but the North where there is more free land available.