The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion -- Book - A Gentle Cynic

BOOK ONE — INTRODUCTION
copy of the original, which is ascribed to its author is not a “forgery;” it could be considered an
“unauthorized” reproduction of it, but not an offense. The words are true, the author is correctly
named, but simply not permitted to be published by whomever printed and/or circulated the
document.
In Jewish religious law, it is said that: “Since the essential characteristic of a forgery is its
intent to deceive,... forgery of documents is not, either in biblical or in talmudic law, a criminal
offense...None the less, it is a recognized evil which the law is called upon to prevent.” 77/
Therefore, if there is no intent to deceive when publishing what is known as the most accurate
and truthful representation of a document — i.e., if that document is complained of not as being
inaccurate or deceptive but merely an unauthorized reproduction of the undisclosed original,
there is no cause for Jews or non-Jews to take offense at this non-offense; and, there is no cause
for the laws of Jews or non-Jews to litigate nor to protect.
It should be noted that apparently in all forms of “law,” a “forgery” is not a “fake” nor
“false.” A forgery, in this sense, is an accurate though unauthorized or unapproved reproduction
or facsimile of the original — a false making; and unless objected to, could be assumed to be a
correct representation of the original which it seeks to display. “Forgery” does not necessarily
mean a fabrication of evidence or a deceitful arrangement of the facts designed to create an
erroneous impression of a false inference in the minds of those who may observe them. A
forgery could also be considered a “counterfeit,” and would of necessity be such that it had in its
content every detail necessary to convince those familiar with it that the “forgery” was similar
and convincing enough as to be offered as an accurate copy or imitation without authority or
right, by passing the copy or thing forged on to others, who would believe it to be an original, or
genuine, or at least a copy based upon the details of the original. It has never been seen by this
present editor that The Protocols were ever decried as anything else but a “forgery” or some
other evasive phraseology tending to avoid answering The Question: Are The Protocols true?’
This lends to the understanding that The Protocols herein presented are nothing more than an
unauthorized though accurate rendering of a true document, which truly describes historical
plans of someone, and which plans we see unfolding before our very eyes.
Part 13.
WILLFUL MISLEADING OF THE UNKNOWING “GENTILES”
To throw fuel on the flames, ignorance and emotional zeal with unsupported assertions,
which would not withstand a moment in a court-of-law, are thrown on to the matter with no
regard for factual evidence in support. At the San Bernardino (California) Public Library, 78/ a
77 JEWISH LAW REGARDING FORGERY. The Jewish Encycl., Vol 6 (Di-Do), p. 1431-32.
78 SAN BERNARDINO PUBLIC LIBRARY. Coincidently, that library is named as a memorial
to Norman F. Feldheym (1906-1985), a local commune-unity leader. (Ed.). In the county of San
Diego, where The Compiler & Editor of This Book lives, many if not most public judicial
“government” buildings are named after Jews. This ordinarily would not be objectionable, until
one observes that San Diego, in the 1990’s, had become a very Jewish-oriented city. Few other
races or ethnic origins are as “represented” in the places and names of power & control. This
bodes poorly for the Jew. (Ed.).
THE PROTOCOLS OF THE LEARNED ELDERS OF ZION Page -31