The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion -- Book - A Gentle Cynic

BOOK ONE — INTRODUCTION
they have been driven, and more than strangers because they had no land of their
own in which they and others could feel that they were completely at home. 121/
(This has all the tone, color and shape of Expulsion in Genesis).
Pinsker’s plan would make use of “alliances”: the Alliance Israélite Universelle, the
Vienna Allianz, and the Anglo-Jewish Association of London. 122/ Another Jew, Israel Zangwill,
writing in synonymous terms and citing from the Talmud 123/ , said what recent American White,
Anglo-Saxon Protestant protestors have been saying for a long time:
“He that owns no land is no man.”
The “Hibbat Zion” movement, 124/ already in existence, held a very generalized version of
a “Jewish State” idea which had been loosely forming until Herzl appeared. Young Jews wanted
a homeland, not in Europe where they believed they could not remain, but in Palestine, which
was held at the time by the Ottoman Empire.
121 THE ROOT OF THE EVIL . Gottheil, at pp. 63-64. If the Jew has no homeland, and if he has
no sense of “property” as such, it is little to be doubted that the Jew would have little regard for
the “property” held by others, and at the same time look upon it in a schizophrenic personality
that wants what it had from the beginning but has not now. While the Jewish State of “Israel”
exists today, most all Jews are not part of it: this lies primarily at the door of the Jews
themselves. See also, Note regarding The Landless Man, and, INTRODUCTION, Part 14,
JUDAISM AS AN INFLICTED MENTAL ILLNESS, in This Book. (Ed.).
122
ALLIANCES. Gottheil, p. 65.
123
HE THAT OWNS NO LAND IS NO MAN. Gottheil, id., Chp. V., “The Jewish Congress,”
p. 138.
124 THE “HIBBAT ZION” MOVEMENT. Or, Hibbat Ziyyon, “Love of Zion.” A movement
organized by Russian Jews as intellectuals and university students, shortly after the 1880’s
pogroms (anti-Jewish rioting) to purchase Palestine from the Sultan. Gottheil, Zionism, Chp. III.,
“Leo Pinsker and Autoemancipation,” p. 67.
The “Zionist” movement, a different group, started in the 1850’s, and joined the younger
“Hibbat Zion.” (Potok, id.). Another Jewish “homeland” group, Chovevi Zion (or, Hobebe
Ziyyon) was “a movement which sought to give tangible expression to the newly awakened
interest in Palestine...regarded as spadeworkers in a cause greater than they themselves
imagined.” (Gottheil, id., pp. 72-73). Zionism started to occupy the position Chovevi Zion
societies should have taken, there was a noticeable discord between the two parties. Gottheil, p.
73.
“The Mizarchi Fraction...were known to be in a large majority [and to] have run a strong
religious thread through the fabric of Zionism, and it is not at all times been easy to meet their
exigencies in the solution of other than purely religious questions...Again, there were also
extreme Palestinians [i.e., Jews favoring a Jewish State of “Palestine”], the so-called Ziyyon
Zionists. These were impatient of delay in furthering what was called `practical work’ in
Palestine, and some went even so far as to demand the transference of the whole movement, bag
and baggage, to the Promised Land.” Gottheil, pp. 135, 152 and 226 n. 4, citing “Protokoll des
Neunten Zionist-Kongresses,” at p. 239.
The Jews are not “as one,” nor as perfectly organized and entirely co-operative
with each other, as non-Jews think the Jews are. A hidden tool, which we fail to use. (Ed.).
THE PROTOCOLS OF THE LEARNED ELDERS OF ZION Page -41