08.08.2013 Views

The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion -- Book - A Gentle Cynic

The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion -- Book - A Gentle Cynic

The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion -- Book - A Gentle Cynic

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

BOOK ONE — INTRODUCTION<br />

<strong>of</strong>fering <strong>The</strong> <strong>Protocols</strong> to <strong>the</strong> world was to enlighten <strong>the</strong> Czar about this secret police and to<br />

favorable influence his policies toward that secret police and its usefulness.<br />

This anonymous Czarist employee/author, described by <strong>the</strong> Jews as a “forger,” is alleged<br />

to have adapted an old French political pamphlet written by M. Maurice Joly 162/ in 1864, titled<br />

Dialogue aux Dnfers intre Machiavel et Montesquieu, au la politique ay xixe siécle, 163/ (or,<br />

Dialogue Between Machiavelli and Montesquieu in Hell and, “<strong>the</strong> forgers took this pamphlet,<br />

substituted world Jewry for <strong>the</strong> French emperor, and added a number <strong>of</strong> picturesque details<br />

borrowed from an obscure [and unnamed] German novel.” 164/ In <strong>the</strong> French pamphlet, M. Jolly<br />

suggested Napoleon III had ambitions <strong>of</strong> world domination, but it did not make any reference to<br />

<strong>the</strong> Jews or to Judaism. 165/<br />

Rashi, (Rabbi Solomon ben Isaac) <strong>the</strong> great Jewish scholar <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> eleventh<br />

century...[Unfinished Commentary -Ed.].<br />

<strong>The</strong> Jews allege that <strong>the</strong> writer <strong>of</strong> Russian version <strong>of</strong> <strong>The</strong> <strong>Protocols</strong> had changed <strong>the</strong>se<br />

Joly/French “protocols” into <strong>the</strong> “protocols” <strong>of</strong> a conference <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> leaders <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> world Jewry<br />

meeting at that time, and that this meeting decided that, under <strong>the</strong> cloak <strong>of</strong> modern democracy,<br />

<strong>the</strong>y (<strong>the</strong> Jews) had already gained control <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> policies <strong>of</strong> numerous European states, and were<br />

<strong>the</strong>refore very close to obtaining success in achieving <strong>the</strong>ir objective(s).<br />

It does not seem likely that <strong>The</strong> <strong>Protocols</strong> are a “Joly” imitation; Napoleon is not<br />

characterized by any historian as being a specific despot, he was a general despot, i.e., Napoleon<br />

only wanted power and domination, not <strong>the</strong> specific suppression <strong>of</strong>, as in this case, any particular<br />

religion. Indeed, Napoleon “emancipated” <strong>the</strong> Jews after his ascension to power and ultimately<br />

to Emperor, 166/ so no publication set forth as a characterization <strong>of</strong> Napoleon could reasonably<br />

162 M. MAURICE JOLY. Also known as “Maurice Joel,” a Jewish revolutionary; a communist<br />

and predecessor to Trotsky-like <strong>the</strong>ory. Levy, A Lie & Libel, re: Segel, “History,” at. 68. See also<br />

n.JOLY, above.<br />

163 JOLY, AUTHOR OF NAPOLEON SPOOFS. See: Levy, A Lie & a Libel; Encycl. Jud.,<br />

“<strong>Learned</strong> <strong>Elders</strong>, <strong>The</strong> <strong>Protocols</strong> <strong>of</strong>.”<br />

164 PICTURESQUE DETAILS. See: Lewis, Semites & Anti-Semites, id., at p. 108.<br />

165 THE “JOLY” WRITINGS AS A BASIS. See also, Lewis, Semites and Anti-Semites, id., p.<br />

108.<br />

166 NAPOLEON “EMANCIPATION” OF THE JEWS. Potok, Wanderings: History <strong>of</strong> <strong>The</strong> Jews,<br />

pp. 366, 374. This emancipation was done “in two stages: <strong>the</strong> Sephardic Jews <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> south, ion<br />

January 28, 1790,...on September 27, 1791, <strong>the</strong> Ashkenazi Jews <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> north...” (Potok, p. 366.<br />

But, “[i]n 1807, one Hasidic tzaddik Shneur Zalman <strong>of</strong> Lyady, urged his followers to spy against<br />

Napoleon on behalf <strong>of</strong> Russia. `If Bonaparte wins,’ he says, `<strong>the</strong> wealthy among [Jewish] Israel<br />

would increase and <strong>the</strong> greatness <strong>of</strong> Israel would be raised, but <strong>the</strong>y would leave and take <strong>the</strong><br />

heart <strong>of</strong> Israel far from our Fa<strong>the</strong>r in Heaven. Hasidism greeted with suspicion <strong>the</strong> Napoleonic<br />

order to put an end to <strong>the</strong> ghettos in <strong>the</strong> lands France conquered.” id., p. 356.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Reader may now be surprisingly enlightened: Most non-Jews believe “Ghettos” are<br />

equivalent to “slums, deteriorated buildings, unfit for human living.” Not true. In Ford, Int’l Jew,<br />

Leo N. Levi, <strong>the</strong> president <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> American Jewish Committee in <strong>the</strong> early 1900’s, said in his<br />

own words how it is revealed that <strong>the</strong> Jews desired <strong>the</strong>se “ghettos”; that <strong>the</strong> Jews wanted it for<br />

<strong>the</strong>mselves:<br />

“<strong>The</strong> Ghetto is not a corner into which <strong>the</strong> non-Jews have herded <strong>the</strong> Semites; <strong>the</strong><br />

THE PROTOCOLS OF THE LEARNED ELDERS OF ZION Page -52

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!