08.08.2013 Views

The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion -- Book - A Gentle Cynic

The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion -- Book - A Gentle Cynic

The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion -- Book - A Gentle Cynic

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

BOOK ONE — INTRODUCTION<br />

Henry Ford had publicly asked that his name not be associated with his publications in<br />

ei<strong>the</strong>r news articles in his personally published newspaper, <strong>the</strong> Dearborn Independent, and/or his<br />

four-volume compilation <strong>of</strong> those newspaper articles into <strong>The</strong> International Jew, none<strong>the</strong>less<br />

references to Ford’s publications — which are now exceeding any “copyright” laws and thus<br />

placed in <strong>the</strong> public access and use — are commonly made to <strong>the</strong> titled Works <strong>of</strong> Ford, as “Ford,<br />

<strong>The</strong> International Jew, etc., but let it be known that Ford did retract his name from those Works,<br />

and is such Works here are cited merely for <strong>the</strong> convenience <strong>of</strong> <strong>The</strong> Reader, to distinguish Ford’s<br />

Work from that <strong>of</strong> Gerald L.I. Smith’s publications under <strong>the</strong> same title <strong>of</strong> <strong>The</strong> International<br />

Jew. However, a retraction <strong>of</strong> ones’ name from <strong>the</strong> title page does not render that Work<br />

meaningless nor unusable or untrue.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Reader is reminded that as <strong>of</strong> A.D. 1996, and now 2009, a significant majority<br />

(perhaps 98% at least) <strong>of</strong> all public libraries do not have any publication listed in <strong>the</strong>ir catalogues<br />

titled, by any variation, whe<strong>the</strong>r as <strong>the</strong> <strong>Protocols</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Zion</strong>, or <strong>The</strong> <strong>Protocols</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Learned</strong> <strong>Elders</strong><br />

[or, Wise Men] <strong>of</strong> <strong>Zion</strong>; or <strong>The</strong> Great in <strong>the</strong> Small — in which a text <strong>of</strong> <strong>The</strong> <strong>Protocols</strong> were<br />

Appended; and regardless <strong>of</strong> those which do list it, none <strong>of</strong> those libraries have that publication<br />

on <strong>the</strong>ir shelf nor in <strong>the</strong>ir library storage possession. On that basis, it is difficult to overcome<br />

Jewish authors who can quote so pr<strong>of</strong>usely and comment in such historical detail to allege <strong>the</strong><br />

“forgery” <strong>of</strong> <strong>The</strong> <strong>Protocols</strong> when no one else seems to be able to find <strong>the</strong>se Works for <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

review and confirmation <strong>of</strong> that “forgery.” (And yet, <strong>the</strong> claim <strong>of</strong> forgery implies that it is a<br />

deceptively yet perfectly re-presented image <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> “original”).<br />

A CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING EMPHASIS IN THE TEXT<br />

<strong>The</strong> Text <strong>of</strong> <strong>The</strong> <strong>Protocols</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Learned</strong> <strong>Elders</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Zion</strong>, presented for <strong>The</strong> Reader’s<br />

consideration, was found in two different publications, both <strong>of</strong> which were in most all details<br />

exactly <strong>the</strong> same, except as noted in <strong>the</strong> “Annotated Text” <strong>of</strong> This <strong>Book</strong>. <strong>The</strong> Reader will note<br />

that in <strong>the</strong> Text presented in This <strong>Book</strong>’s “Original Text” is <strong>the</strong> same as <strong>the</strong> “Annotated Text” —<br />

being <strong>the</strong> same exact Text as <strong>the</strong> “Original,” but with added Sources, Facts, Details and Timely<br />

Commentary.<br />

In <strong>the</strong> “Annotated Text” <strong>of</strong> This <strong>Book</strong>, <strong>The</strong> Reader shall find some helpful explanatory<br />

text, presented in CAPITAL LETTERING, and placed within brackets “[ — ]”, which shall give<br />

some prompting as to <strong>the</strong> general topic discussed by <strong>the</strong> Author <strong>of</strong> <strong>The</strong> <strong>Protocols</strong>. <strong>The</strong>se<br />

bracketed words are not part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> “Original Text,” and should not be quoted as part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

“Original Text.”<br />

<strong>The</strong>re are for some reason certain kinds <strong>of</strong> “emphasis,” placed upon words and/or phrases<br />

found in <strong>the</strong> “Original Text;” emphasis such as: CAPITAL LETTERING, or, Italicized Words.<br />

This is how <strong>the</strong>se words and phrases appeared in <strong>the</strong> two Sources upon which <strong>The</strong> Compiler &<br />

Editor <strong>of</strong> This <strong>Book</strong> relies, and <strong>the</strong>re is no original nor any o<strong>the</strong>r reliable, confirmed <strong>Protocols</strong><br />

document with which to compare for accuracy. It is doubtful that such emphasis was present in<br />

<strong>the</strong> first publication <strong>of</strong> <strong>The</strong> <strong>Protocols</strong>, but that is not as yet possible to prove.<br />

However, any kind <strong>of</strong> word-emphasis may, for better or worse, not be advantageous.<br />

Such emphasis may direct <strong>The</strong> Readers attention to some important point, believed <strong>the</strong><br />

THE PROTOCOLS OF THE LEARNED ELDERS OF ZION Page -7-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!