09.08.2013 Views

Women at Work in the Deuteronomistic History - International Voices ...

Women at Work in the Deuteronomistic History - International Voices ...

Women at Work in the Deuteronomistic History - International Voices ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

FEMALE SLAVES AND DEPENDENTS | 129<br />

Servants of Important Characters. This sub-section <strong>in</strong>cludes, with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> DtrH,<br />

only one case: <strong>the</strong> unnamed החפשׁ <strong>in</strong> 2 Sam 17:17, who helped pass on<br />

<strong>in</strong>form<strong>at</strong>ion to David’s troops dur<strong>in</strong>g Absalom’s revolt. This woman would<br />

leave <strong>the</strong> palace unnoticed and report events to David’s men. The most<br />

<strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g aspect of this woman is th<strong>at</strong> she is given <strong>the</strong> characteristics of a<br />

הרענ; she is unnamed and immedi<strong>at</strong>ely disappears from <strong>the</strong> story; she trespasses<br />

boundaries and is depicted outside r<strong>at</strong>her than <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> household. Conversely, <strong>in</strong><br />

this text <strong>the</strong> החפשׁ is not said to have been given as dowry, is not used to give<br />

<strong>the</strong> master offspr<strong>in</strong>g, and is not a possession <strong>in</strong> general. She might have been all<br />

of <strong>the</strong>se th<strong>in</strong>gs, but Dtr only uses her ability to trespass <strong>the</strong> threshold, an ability<br />

which is typical of םירענ and תורענ, as Leeb has shown. 36<br />

Outside of DtrH o<strong>the</strong>r servants of important characters—aside from <strong>the</strong><br />

תורענ—appear <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Genesis narr<strong>at</strong>ives. In narr<strong>at</strong>ives which focus on surrog<strong>at</strong>e<br />

mo<strong>the</strong>rs <strong>the</strong>y reta<strong>in</strong> both <strong>the</strong>ir st<strong>at</strong>us of slave and <strong>in</strong>clusion <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> family.<br />

Hagar, Zilpah, and Bilhah are servants to <strong>the</strong> mistress and slave-wives to <strong>the</strong><br />

master. 37 The tre<strong>at</strong>ment of Hagar by Sarah and Abraham poignantly reflects this<br />

double st<strong>at</strong>us and it is far more developed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> narr<strong>at</strong>ives than <strong>the</strong> stories of<br />

Zilpah and Bilhah.<br />

Hagar. Hagar appears <strong>in</strong> two different chapters: Gen 16 (<strong>at</strong>tributed to <strong>the</strong> J<br />

tradition) calls her Sarah’s החפשׁ; Gen 21 (E) calls her Abraham’s המא. There<br />

have appeared several good studies on Hagar, restor<strong>in</strong>g her to her deserved<br />

position of m<strong>at</strong>riarch. The follow<strong>in</strong>g notes look <strong>at</strong> wh<strong>at</strong> her story tells about<br />

slavery.<br />

Hagar’s story embodies <strong>the</strong> ambivalence <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> slave between her be<strong>in</strong>g a<br />

person and her use as a commodity, as well as <strong>the</strong> ambivalence between her role<br />

of slave to Sarah and secondary wife to Abraham (המא), although her st<strong>at</strong>us of<br />

secondary wife (or slave-wife) was not enough to ensure his generosity toward<br />

<strong>the</strong> mo<strong>the</strong>r of his child, even if by law he was not bound to give her anyth<strong>in</strong>g. 38<br />

J. W<strong>at</strong>ers struggles with some of <strong>the</strong> very questions th<strong>at</strong> motiv<strong>at</strong>ed our<br />

study, namely, why is <strong>the</strong>re no fem<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>e noun from <strong>the</strong> verb דבע “serve” to talk<br />

about women? Why two nouns and wh<strong>at</strong> is <strong>the</strong> difference between <strong>the</strong>m? In his<br />

book, he looks <strong>at</strong> Hagar’s story from an African American perspective, us<strong>in</strong>g<br />

36 Leeb, Away from <strong>the</strong> F<strong>at</strong>her’s House, 126–128.<br />

37 When Rebekah travels to marry Isaac her wet nurse (תקנימ), Deborah, travels with her. There<br />

seem to have been many situ<strong>at</strong>ions like this, when <strong>the</strong> services of a slave changed <strong>in</strong> k<strong>in</strong>d.<br />

38 “The dual st<strong>at</strong>us of <strong>the</strong> slave given as a wife is well expressed by <strong>the</strong> Old Babylonian contractual<br />

formula: ‘A is a slave to B (first wife); a wife to C (husband).’” Westbrook, Property, 153–4, and<br />

154 n.1: “CT 4 39a.9–11; CT 8 22b.5–6; CT 48.6–8. In none of <strong>the</strong>se contracts, however, does <strong>the</strong><br />

slave appear to have been acquired by way of dowry.”

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!