09.08.2013 Views

Women at Work in the Deuteronomistic History - International Voices ...

Women at Work in the Deuteronomistic History - International Voices ...

Women at Work in the Deuteronomistic History - International Voices ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

HIDE AND SEEK: MISCELLANEOUS WOMEN | 221<br />

future (Gen 15:4–6).” 165 At any r<strong>at</strong>e, numerous progeny was more exception<br />

than rule, s<strong>in</strong>ce children under six were <strong>at</strong> high risk and several pregnancies<br />

usually resulted <strong>in</strong> about two to three surviv<strong>in</strong>g children. 166<br />

In Gen 35:17 <strong>the</strong> midwife תדלימ ה appears, comfort<strong>in</strong>g Rachel while she<br />

delivers Ben-oni and dies. In Gen 38:28, a midwife b<strong>in</strong>ds a red crimson around<br />

one of Tamar’s tw<strong>in</strong> sons. F<strong>in</strong>ally, two midwives, Puah and Shiphrah appear <strong>in</strong><br />

Exod 1, where <strong>the</strong>y are called to task because <strong>the</strong> Hebrew babies are not be<strong>in</strong>g<br />

killed, as Pharaoh had ordered <strong>the</strong>m to do. The general ideological assumption is<br />

th<strong>at</strong> Egyptian and Hebrew women are different. 167 But while Pharaoh assumes<br />

Egyptian superiority, <strong>the</strong> Hebrew writer builds upon th<strong>at</strong> same assumption of<br />

difference to st<strong>at</strong>e th<strong>at</strong> Hebrews are better. The Hebrew n<strong>at</strong>ionality of <strong>the</strong> two<br />

midwives loc<strong>at</strong>es <strong>the</strong>m among those persecuted by a Pharaoh who was afraid of<br />

<strong>the</strong> possible growth of <strong>the</strong> Israelites. 168 For <strong>the</strong> writer, Shiphrah and Puah do not<br />

challenge <strong>the</strong> system’s assumption th<strong>at</strong> Egyptians and Hebrews are different,<br />

but turn it around to justify <strong>the</strong>ir refusal to particip<strong>at</strong>e <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> babies’ kill<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>in</strong> a<br />

tactic of survival and resistance often used by m<strong>in</strong>orities or oppressed groups. 169<br />

Funny as Pharaoh’s fear of newborn children might seem to us, he jo<strong>in</strong>s<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r rulers <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir fear of people’s ways. Amico st<strong>at</strong>es: “The role of<br />

midwife/wise woman is strongly <strong>at</strong>tested <strong>in</strong> Hittite texts, where <strong>the</strong> practitioners<br />

were known as <strong>the</strong> ‘Old <strong>Women</strong>.’ Thirteen of <strong>the</strong>m are known by name, and <strong>at</strong><br />

least one Hittite k<strong>in</strong>g, H<strong>at</strong>tušili I, expressed strong disapproval for <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

activities, perhaps because <strong>the</strong>y were so powerful among <strong>the</strong> people.” 170 One<br />

reason why <strong>the</strong>y would be feared is th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong>y, as wise women, ensured a safe<br />

birth for mo<strong>the</strong>r and child through <strong>the</strong> use of proper <strong>in</strong>cant<strong>at</strong>ions and o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

“dark” practices and mysterious remedies, which sometimes would help and<br />

sometimes would seem to have killed <strong>the</strong> mo<strong>the</strong>r or <strong>the</strong> child. 171 Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore,<br />

165<br />

Leo Perdue, “The Israelite and Early Jewish Family: Summary and Conclusions,” <strong>in</strong> Families <strong>in</strong><br />

Ancient Israel, 170.<br />

166<br />

Stager, “Archaeology of <strong>the</strong> Family,” 18; Gruber, “Breast-Feed<strong>in</strong>g,” 61–2, quot<strong>in</strong>g anthropologist<br />

H. Granqvist, Child Problems among <strong>the</strong> Arabs (Hels<strong>in</strong>ki: n.e., 1950), 52–5. Carol Meyers, “The<br />

Roots of Restriction: <strong>Women</strong> <strong>in</strong> Early Israel,” BA 41 (1978): 91–103.<br />

167<br />

Weems, “Hebrew <strong>Women</strong>,” 28.<br />

168<br />

The grammar of <strong>the</strong> text is ambiguous as to <strong>the</strong> n<strong>at</strong>ionality of Shiphrah and Puah; I am assum<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>the</strong>y would be Hebrew because <strong>in</strong> general people have midwives from <strong>the</strong>ir same people –actually,<br />

<strong>the</strong>y usually learned by tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g, start<strong>in</strong>g with <strong>the</strong>ir own families and with no formal prepar<strong>at</strong>ion. It<br />

would make sense th<strong>at</strong> a people who are be<strong>in</strong>g enslaved and persecuted would have <strong>the</strong>ir own<br />

midwives from among <strong>the</strong>ir own women.<br />

169<br />

Weems, “Hebrew <strong>Women</strong>,” 29–30; D. Knight, “Political Rights and Powers <strong>in</strong> Monarchic Israel,”<br />

<strong>in</strong> Ethics and Politics <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Hebrew Bible (ed. D. Knight & C. Meyers. Semeia 66. Atlanta: Scholars<br />

Press, 1995), 104.<br />

170<br />

Amico, “St<strong>at</strong>us of <strong>Women</strong>,” 240.<br />

171<br />

Nancy R. Bowen, “The Daughters of Your People: Female Prophets <strong>in</strong> Ezekiel 13:17–23,” JBL

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!